The spatiotemporal patterns and dynamics of grassland established in the US conservation reserve program (CRP)

IF 9.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Shuchao Ye, Chaoqun Lu
{"title":"The spatiotemporal patterns and dynamics of grassland established in the US conservation reserve program (CRP)","authors":"Shuchao Ye,&nbsp;Chaoqun Lu","doi":"10.1016/j.landurbplan.2025.105488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The significant cropland expansion in the United States (US) has resulted in many environmental issues, such as soil erosion, biodiversity loss, soil and water pollution, etc. To mitigate adverse effects associated with cropland expansion, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) implemented the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) in 1986, one of the US’s largest and most well-known acreage-reduction programs, to alleviate the environmental cost. However, the lack of time-series maps illustrating the spatial distribution of CRP constrains the evaluation of environmental benefits derived from the program. In this study, through integrating CRP statistics and multiple satellite-based land cover datasets, we developed a knowledge inference-based approach by considering CRP practices, contract period, and soil erosion effect to reconstruct CRP grassland maps. The map products developed here are designed to approximate the actual distribution of CRP grasslands, enabling quantitative assessment of CRP outcomes while reserving privacy and proprietary interests of individual farmers. The developed datasets cover the conterminous US from 1986 to 2020 with a resolution of 1 km by 1 km. Using CRP ground points across the US from the Rapid Carbon Assessment (RaCA) program in 2011, we validated the developed CRP map, achieving an overall accuracy of 90 % within a tolerance of 5 km. The results indicate CRP grasslands expanded from 0.60 Mha in 1986 to 10.19 Mha by 1995, then remained stable at around 10.00 Mha for the next decade. However, the area declined steadily to 5.78 Mha by 2020, driven by rising crop prices and the reduced CRP enrollment cap. Spatially, the areas with high CRP percentages were observed in the Midwest and Northwest, the west of the Southern Great Plains, and the north of the Northern Great Plains. In addition, the developed maps include two kinds of CRP grass practices, “the grasslands converted from the former cropland (CPCP)” and “the existing grasslands that were previously replanted from cropland (CPEG)”. We further found that 9–11 % and 12–24 % of CPCP and CPEG have enrolled in CRP twice during 1985–2020, respectively, which may lead to different potentials of CRP-associated carbon sequestration and greenhouse gas reduction compared with one-time or continuous CRP lands. Overall, the developed time-series maps can serve as a good reference to identify the spatiotemporal changes of CRP grasslands and to inform the modeling studies for assessing the CRP-associated environmental benefits and supporting future policymaking.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54744,"journal":{"name":"Landscape and Urban Planning","volume":"264 ","pages":"Article 105488"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Landscape and Urban Planning","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204625001951","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The significant cropland expansion in the United States (US) has resulted in many environmental issues, such as soil erosion, biodiversity loss, soil and water pollution, etc. To mitigate adverse effects associated with cropland expansion, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) implemented the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) in 1986, one of the US’s largest and most well-known acreage-reduction programs, to alleviate the environmental cost. However, the lack of time-series maps illustrating the spatial distribution of CRP constrains the evaluation of environmental benefits derived from the program. In this study, through integrating CRP statistics and multiple satellite-based land cover datasets, we developed a knowledge inference-based approach by considering CRP practices, contract period, and soil erosion effect to reconstruct CRP grassland maps. The map products developed here are designed to approximate the actual distribution of CRP grasslands, enabling quantitative assessment of CRP outcomes while reserving privacy and proprietary interests of individual farmers. The developed datasets cover the conterminous US from 1986 to 2020 with a resolution of 1 km by 1 km. Using CRP ground points across the US from the Rapid Carbon Assessment (RaCA) program in 2011, we validated the developed CRP map, achieving an overall accuracy of 90 % within a tolerance of 5 km. The results indicate CRP grasslands expanded from 0.60 Mha in 1986 to 10.19 Mha by 1995, then remained stable at around 10.00 Mha for the next decade. However, the area declined steadily to 5.78 Mha by 2020, driven by rising crop prices and the reduced CRP enrollment cap. Spatially, the areas with high CRP percentages were observed in the Midwest and Northwest, the west of the Southern Great Plains, and the north of the Northern Great Plains. In addition, the developed maps include two kinds of CRP grass practices, “the grasslands converted from the former cropland (CPCP)” and “the existing grasslands that were previously replanted from cropland (CPEG)”. We further found that 9–11 % and 12–24 % of CPCP and CPEG have enrolled in CRP twice during 1985–2020, respectively, which may lead to different potentials of CRP-associated carbon sequestration and greenhouse gas reduction compared with one-time or continuous CRP lands. Overall, the developed time-series maps can serve as a good reference to identify the spatiotemporal changes of CRP grasslands and to inform the modeling studies for assessing the CRP-associated environmental benefits and supporting future policymaking.
美国自然保护区(CRP)草地的时空格局与动态
美国耕地的大量扩张导致了许多环境问题,如土壤侵蚀、生物多样性丧失、土壤和水污染等。为了减轻与农田扩张相关的不利影响,美国农业部(USDA)于1986年实施了美国最大和最知名的面积减少计划之一的保护储备计划(CRP),以减轻环境成本。然而,缺乏说明CRP空间分布的时间序列地图限制了对该计划产生的环境效益的评估。本研究通过整合CRP统计数据和多个基于卫星的土地覆盖数据集,提出了一种基于知识推理的方法,考虑CRP实践、契约期和土壤侵蚀效应,重建CRP草地图。这里开发的地图产品旨在近似CRP草原的实际分布,在保留个体农民隐私和专有利益的同时,能够定量评估CRP结果。开发的数据集覆盖1986年至2020年的美国连续区域,分辨率为1公里× 1公里。利用2011年快速碳评估(RaCA)项目中美国各地的CRP地面点,我们验证了开发的CRP地图,在5公里的公差范围内实现了90%的总体精度。结果表明,CRP草地从1986年的0.60 Mha扩大到1995年的10.19 Mha,并在未来10年稳定在10.00 Mha左右。然而,受作物价格上涨和CRP登记上限降低的影响,到2020年,CRP百分比稳步下降至5.78 Mha。从空间上看,CRP百分比高的地区分布在中西部和西北部、南部大平原西部和北部大平原北部。此外,已开发的地图还包括两种CRP草地实践,“从原农田转换的草地(CPCP)”和“以前从农田重新种植的现有草地(CPEG)”。在1985-2020年期间,CPCP和CPEG分别有9 - 11%和12 - 24%参与了两次CRP,这可能导致CPCP相关的碳固存和温室气体减排潜力与一次性或连续CRP土地不同。总体而言,所建立的时序图可以为识别CRP草地的时空变化提供良好的参考,并为CRP相关的环境效益评估和未来政策制定提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Landscape and Urban Planning
Landscape and Urban Planning 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
6.60%
发文量
232
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Landscape and Urban Planning is an international journal that aims to enhance our understanding of landscapes and promote sustainable solutions for landscape change. The journal focuses on landscapes as complex social-ecological systems that encompass various spatial and temporal dimensions. These landscapes possess aesthetic, natural, and cultural qualities that are valued by individuals in different ways, leading to actions that alter the landscape. With increasing urbanization and the need for ecological and cultural sensitivity at various scales, a multidisciplinary approach is necessary to comprehend and align social and ecological values for landscape sustainability. The journal believes that combining landscape science with planning and design can yield positive outcomes for both people and nature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信