{"title":"Building carbon emissions (2016–2025): A PRISMA-based systematic review of definitions, quantification methods and policies","authors":"Xierong Gu , Lei Fan , Ron Mahabir","doi":"10.1016/j.envdev.2025.101345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Managing carbon emissions from buildings requires integrated approaches across the entire lifecycle. Establishing such approaches depends on a clear understanding of key definitions for conceptual grounding, reliable quantification methods for measurement frameworks, and well-designed policies to guide effective reduction strategies. This paper analysed 111 publications on building carbon emissions from 2016 to 2025 using the PRISMA method. Key definitions have evolved from emission source perspectives to life cycle frameworks based on ISO 21930, which divides a building's life cycle into standardized stages. Past research has primarily focused on the B1-B7 stage, followed by the A1-A5 stage, while the C1-D remains understudied. Our review covers diverse quantification methods, including traditional estimation methods, data-driven prediction models (statistical, shallow machine learning, deep learning and hybrid), and emerging large language models. Our review reveals significant regional differences in policy approaches: European frameworks emphasize systematic standards, Chinese approaches centre on mandatory requirements, and American strategies focus on economic incentives. Research contributions are concentrated in China (29 %), Europe (14 %), and the United States (12 %). Drawing on the review, we also propose various reduction measures from a life cycle perspective. This review provides critical guidance for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers working to advance carbon neutrality goals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54269,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Development","volume":"57 ","pages":"Article 101345"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Development","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211464525002118","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Managing carbon emissions from buildings requires integrated approaches across the entire lifecycle. Establishing such approaches depends on a clear understanding of key definitions for conceptual grounding, reliable quantification methods for measurement frameworks, and well-designed policies to guide effective reduction strategies. This paper analysed 111 publications on building carbon emissions from 2016 to 2025 using the PRISMA method. Key definitions have evolved from emission source perspectives to life cycle frameworks based on ISO 21930, which divides a building's life cycle into standardized stages. Past research has primarily focused on the B1-B7 stage, followed by the A1-A5 stage, while the C1-D remains understudied. Our review covers diverse quantification methods, including traditional estimation methods, data-driven prediction models (statistical, shallow machine learning, deep learning and hybrid), and emerging large language models. Our review reveals significant regional differences in policy approaches: European frameworks emphasize systematic standards, Chinese approaches centre on mandatory requirements, and American strategies focus on economic incentives. Research contributions are concentrated in China (29 %), Europe (14 %), and the United States (12 %). Drawing on the review, we also propose various reduction measures from a life cycle perspective. This review provides critical guidance for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers working to advance carbon neutrality goals.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Development provides a future oriented, pro-active, authoritative source of information and learning for researchers, postgraduate students, policymakers, and managers, and bridges the gap between fundamental research and the application in management and policy practices. It stimulates the exchange and coupling of traditional scientific knowledge on the environment, with the experiential knowledge among decision makers and other stakeholders and also connects natural sciences and social and behavioral sciences. Environmental Development includes and promotes scientific work from the non-western world, and also strengthens the collaboration between the developed and developing world. Further it links environmental research to broader issues of economic and social-cultural developments, and is intended to shorten the delays between research and publication, while ensuring thorough peer review. Environmental Development also creates a forum for transnational communication, discussion and global action.
Environmental Development is open to a broad range of disciplines and authors. The journal welcomes, in particular, contributions from a younger generation of researchers, and papers expanding the frontiers of environmental sciences, pointing at new directions and innovative answers.
All submissions to Environmental Development are reviewed using the general criteria of quality, originality, precision, importance of topic and insights, clarity of exposition, which are in keeping with the journal''s aims and scope.