Artificial Intelligence–Assisted Endoscopy in Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Tumors: A review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

Olivier Sibomana , Sulymon A. Saka , Marie Grace Uwizeyimana , Alex Mwangi Kihunyu , Abraham Obianke , Samuel Oluwo Damilare , Lewis Tem Bueh , Beloved of God Agbelemoge , Richard Omoefe Oveh
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence–Assisted Endoscopy in Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Tumors: A review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses","authors":"Olivier Sibomana ,&nbsp;Sulymon A. Saka ,&nbsp;Marie Grace Uwizeyimana ,&nbsp;Alex Mwangi Kihunyu ,&nbsp;Abraham Obianke ,&nbsp;Samuel Oluwo Damilare ,&nbsp;Lewis Tem Bueh ,&nbsp;Beloved of God Agbelemoge ,&nbsp;Richard Omoefe Oveh","doi":"10.1016/j.gastha.2025.100754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>AI-assisted endoscopy has emerged as a promising tool for early and accurate detection of gastrointestinal (GI) tumors, which are associated with high morbidity, mortality, and financial burden. This review summarizes systematic reviews and meta-analyses on AI-assisted endoscopy in GI tumor diagnosis. A comprehensive search was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, DOAJ, AJOL, and the Cochrane Library, supplemented by manual searches. Eligible systematic reviews and meta-analyses were selected based on predefined inclusion criteria, and relevant data were extracted to evaluate AI-assisted endoscopy’s diagnostic performance. Out of 569 identified studies, 23 systematic reviews with meta-analyses met the inclusion criteria, with 6 focusing on detection rates and 17 on diagnostic accuracy. AI-assisted endoscopy demonstrated a significantly higher detection rate for GI tumors compared to conventional endoscopy, alongside high diagnostic accuracy across different GI tumor types. However, variability in performance was observed among different AI algorithms and studies. While AI-assisted endoscopy enhances diagnostic precision, rigorous validation of AI models is necessary to ensure clinical reliability. Ethical considerations and further research are crucial for optimizing AI’s role in healthcare.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73130,"journal":{"name":"Gastro hep advances","volume":"4 9","pages":"Article 100754"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastro hep advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772572325001414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AI-assisted endoscopy has emerged as a promising tool for early and accurate detection of gastrointestinal (GI) tumors, which are associated with high morbidity, mortality, and financial burden. This review summarizes systematic reviews and meta-analyses on AI-assisted endoscopy in GI tumor diagnosis. A comprehensive search was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, DOAJ, AJOL, and the Cochrane Library, supplemented by manual searches. Eligible systematic reviews and meta-analyses were selected based on predefined inclusion criteria, and relevant data were extracted to evaluate AI-assisted endoscopy’s diagnostic performance. Out of 569 identified studies, 23 systematic reviews with meta-analyses met the inclusion criteria, with 6 focusing on detection rates and 17 on diagnostic accuracy. AI-assisted endoscopy demonstrated a significantly higher detection rate for GI tumors compared to conventional endoscopy, alongside high diagnostic accuracy across different GI tumor types. However, variability in performance was observed among different AI algorithms and studies. While AI-assisted endoscopy enhances diagnostic precision, rigorous validation of AI models is necessary to ensure clinical reliability. Ethical considerations and further research are crucial for optimizing AI’s role in healthcare.
人工智能辅助内镜在胃肠道肿瘤诊断中的应用:系统综述和荟萃分析综述
人工智能辅助内镜已成为早期准确检测胃肠道肿瘤(GI)的一种有前途的工具,胃肠道肿瘤具有高发病率、高死亡率和高经济负担。本文综述了人工智能辅助内镜在胃肠道肿瘤诊断中的系统评价和荟萃分析。通过PubMed/MEDLINE、谷歌Scholar、DOAJ、AJOL和Cochrane Library进行全面检索,并辅以人工检索。根据预定义的纳入标准选择符合条件的系统评价和荟萃分析,并提取相关数据以评估人工智能辅助内窥镜的诊断性能。在569项确定的研究中,有23项系统评价与荟萃分析符合纳入标准,其中6项关注检出率,17项关注诊断准确性。与传统内镜相比,人工智能辅助内镜对胃肠道肿瘤的检出率明显更高,对不同胃肠道肿瘤类型的诊断准确率也较高。然而,在不同的人工智能算法和研究中,观察到性能的差异。虽然人工智能辅助内窥镜检查提高了诊断精度,但为了确保临床可靠性,必须对人工智能模型进行严格验证。伦理考虑和进一步研究对于优化人工智能在医疗保健中的作用至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gastro hep advances
Gastro hep advances Gastroenterology
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
64 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信