Ecolabels as Heuristic Cues: Exploring the Role of Ecolabels in Food Attribute Inferences

IF 13.3 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Francisco José Torres‐Peña, Manuel Parras‐Rosa, Carla Marano‐Marcolini, Francisco José Torres‐Ruiz
{"title":"Ecolabels as Heuristic Cues: Exploring the Role of Ecolabels in Food Attribute Inferences","authors":"Francisco José Torres‐Peña, Manuel Parras‐Rosa, Carla Marano‐Marcolini, Francisco José Torres‐Ruiz","doi":"10.1002/bse.70175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study presents a novel approach by examining the role of environmental labels (e.g., ecolabels) as heuristic cues in consumer inferences, beyond their traditional informational function. The research evaluated the influence of the presence, number, and type (real or fake) of ecolabels on consumer inferences of an extra virgin olive oil product through a between‐subjects experiment involving 720 participants in Spain. The methodology was designed to minimize common biases by exposing each participant to only one stimulus and employing real product labels and packaging with controlled modifications (including both the quantity and type of seal, real and fake). Using various multivariate analyses of covariance (MANCOVA), the study sequentially explored a set of research questions regarding the impact of the number of ecolabels and their potential interchangeability across seven distinct product dimensions. The findings reveal that ecolabels do not significantly enhance overall product evaluations, except in two dimensions associated with human‐related attributes—commitment to quality and producer honesty—which are more closely linked to the generic certification process than to the specific meaning of each label. No linear relationship or optimal number of labels was identified, and no significant differences were found between real and fake ecolabels. The results suggest that ecolabels function primarily as generic heuristic cues with limited influence, particularly when the product's presentation is visually appealing.","PeriodicalId":9518,"journal":{"name":"Business Strategy and The Environment","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Strategy and The Environment","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70175","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents a novel approach by examining the role of environmental labels (e.g., ecolabels) as heuristic cues in consumer inferences, beyond their traditional informational function. The research evaluated the influence of the presence, number, and type (real or fake) of ecolabels on consumer inferences of an extra virgin olive oil product through a between‐subjects experiment involving 720 participants in Spain. The methodology was designed to minimize common biases by exposing each participant to only one stimulus and employing real product labels and packaging with controlled modifications (including both the quantity and type of seal, real and fake). Using various multivariate analyses of covariance (MANCOVA), the study sequentially explored a set of research questions regarding the impact of the number of ecolabels and their potential interchangeability across seven distinct product dimensions. The findings reveal that ecolabels do not significantly enhance overall product evaluations, except in two dimensions associated with human‐related attributes—commitment to quality and producer honesty—which are more closely linked to the generic certification process than to the specific meaning of each label. No linear relationship or optimal number of labels was identified, and no significant differences were found between real and fake ecolabels. The results suggest that ecolabels function primarily as generic heuristic cues with limited influence, particularly when the product's presentation is visually appealing.
生态标签作为启发式线索:探索生态标签在食品属性推断中的作用
本研究提出了一种新的方法,通过检查环境标签(例如,生态标签)的作用,作为启发式线索,在消费者的推断,超越其传统的信息功能。该研究评估了生态标签的存在、数量和类型(真或假)对消费者对特级初榨橄榄油产品的推断的影响,该实验涉及西班牙的720名参与者。该方法旨在通过让每个参与者只接触一种刺激,并使用真实的产品标签和包装,并进行控制修改(包括密封的数量和类型,真假),从而最大限度地减少常见的偏见。使用各种多变量协方差分析(MANCOVA),该研究依次探索了一系列关于生态标签数量的影响及其在七个不同产品维度上的潜在互换性的研究问题。研究结果表明,生态标签并没有显著提高产品的整体评价,除了与人类相关的属性相关的两个维度——对质量的承诺和生产者的诚实——这两个维度与通用认证过程的联系比与每个标签的具体含义更紧密。没有发现线性关系或最佳标签数量,真实和虚假生态标签之间没有显着差异。结果表明,生态标签的功能主要是作为通用的启发式线索,影响有限,特别是当产品的呈现是视觉上吸引人的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
22.50
自引率
19.40%
发文量
336
期刊介绍: Business Strategy and the Environment (BSE) is a leading academic journal focused on business strategies for improving the natural environment. It publishes peer-reviewed research on various topics such as systems and standards, environmental performance, disclosure, eco-innovation, corporate environmental management tools, organizations and management, supply chains, circular economy, governance, green finance, industry sectors, and responses to climate change and other contemporary environmental issues. The journal aims to provide original contributions that enhance the understanding of sustainability in business. Its target audience includes academics, practitioners, business managers, and consultants. However, BSE does not accept papers on corporate social responsibility (CSR), as this topic is covered by its sibling journal Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. The journal is indexed in several databases and collections such as ABI/INFORM Collection, Agricultural & Environmental Science Database, BIOBASE, Emerald Management Reviews, GeoArchive, Environment Index, GEOBASE, INSPEC, Technology Collection, and Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信