Preparing Special Educators to Generalize Evidence-Based Practices Across Students and Situations: A Systematic Review

IF 2.1 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Kara N. Shawbitz, Matthew E. Brock
{"title":"Preparing Special Educators to Generalize Evidence-Based Practices Across Students and Situations: A Systematic Review","authors":"Kara N. Shawbitz, Matthew E. Brock","doi":"10.1177/07419325251359971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Closing the research-to-practice gap in special education requires high-quality training that enables educators to generalize evidence-based practices (EBPs) across students, settings, and situations. In this systematic review, we identified 52 studies published in 50 articles that measured generalization of teacher, pre-service teacher, or paraeducator fidelity of practices for students with disabilities. Most studies used a combination of didactic instruction, roleplay, modeling, and performance feedback to train practitioners to implement educational practices. Consistent with previous reviews, most studies (77%) did not report using any specific approach to promote generalization of practitioner implementation. Results showed that although this approach did sometimes lead to generalization, results were mixed. In other studies, researchers programmed for generalization using strategies such as mediating generalization, training educators to generalize, or sequential modification through performance feedback. We offer suggestions for how researchers can design studies to measure generalized effects, and how educators can leverage strategies for generalization.","PeriodicalId":48042,"journal":{"name":"Remedial and Special Education","volume":"215 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Remedial and Special Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325251359971","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Closing the research-to-practice gap in special education requires high-quality training that enables educators to generalize evidence-based practices (EBPs) across students, settings, and situations. In this systematic review, we identified 52 studies published in 50 articles that measured generalization of teacher, pre-service teacher, or paraeducator fidelity of practices for students with disabilities. Most studies used a combination of didactic instruction, roleplay, modeling, and performance feedback to train practitioners to implement educational practices. Consistent with previous reviews, most studies (77%) did not report using any specific approach to promote generalization of practitioner implementation. Results showed that although this approach did sometimes lead to generalization, results were mixed. In other studies, researchers programmed for generalization using strategies such as mediating generalization, training educators to generalize, or sequential modification through performance feedback. We offer suggestions for how researchers can design studies to measure generalized effects, and how educators can leverage strategies for generalization.
准备特殊教育者在学生和情境中推广基于证据的实践:系统回顾
缩小特殊教育研究与实践之间的差距需要高质量的培训,使教育工作者能够在学生、环境和情况下推广基于证据的实践(ebp)。在这篇系统综述中,我们确定了发表在50篇文章中的52项研究,这些研究测量了教师、职前教师或辅助教育者对残疾学生实践的忠诚度。大多数研究采用说教式指导、角色扮演、建模和绩效反馈相结合的方法来训练实践者实施教育实践。与先前的综述一致,大多数研究(77%)没有报告使用任何特定的方法来促进从业者实施的泛化。结果表明,虽然这种方法有时会导致泛化,但结果是混合的。在其他研究中,研究人员使用诸如中介泛化、培训教育者泛化或通过绩效反馈进行顺序修改等策略对泛化进行编程。我们为研究人员如何设计研究来测量广义效应,以及教育工作者如何利用策略进行泛化提供了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Remedial and Special Education
Remedial and Special Education EDUCATION, SPECIAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Remedial and Special Education (RASE) is devoted to the discussion of issues involving the education of persons for whom typical instruction is not effective. Emphasis is on the interpretation of research literature and recommendations for the practice of remedial and special education. Appropriate topics include, but are not limited to, definition, identification, assessment, characteristics, management, and instruction of underachieving and exceptional children, youth, and adults; related services; family involvement; service delivery systems; legislation; litigation; and professional standards and training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信