More similarity than difference: Comparison of within- and between-sex variance in early adolescent brain structure.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) Pub Date : 2025-09-02 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1162/IMAG.a.127
Carinna Torgerson, Katherine Bottenhorn, Hedyeh Ahmadi, Jeiran Choupan, Megan M Herting
{"title":"More similarity than difference: Comparison of within- and between-sex variance in early adolescent brain structure.","authors":"Carinna Torgerson, Katherine Bottenhorn, Hedyeh Ahmadi, Jeiran Choupan, Megan M Herting","doi":"10.1162/IMAG.a.127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adolescent neuroimaging studies of sex differences in the human brain predominantly examine average differences between males and females. This focus on mean differences without probing relative distributions and similarities may contribute to both conflation and overestimation of sex differences and sexual dimorphism in the developing human brain. We aimed to characterize the variance in brain macro- and micro-structure in early adolescence as it pertains to sex at birth using a large sample of 9-11-year-olds from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study (N = 7,723). For global and regional estimates of gray and white matter volume, cortical thickness, and white matter microstructure (i.e., fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity), we examined: within- and between-sex variance, overlap between male and female distributions, inhomogeneity of variance, effect size, and CLES. We examined these sex differences using both unadjusted (raw) brain estimates and residualized brain estimates from mixed-effects modeling (adjusted) to account for variance better attributed to age, pubertal development, socioeconomic status, race, ethnicity, MRI scanner manufacturer, and total brain volume, where applicable. Contrary to the popular view of the brain as sexually dimorphic, we found high similarity and low difference between sexes in all regional measurements of brain structure examined after accounting for other sources of variance. However, the sex difference for adjusted total brain volume (TBV) had a medium effect size and a 71.9% probability that a randomly chosen male adolescent would have a larger brain than a randomly chosen female adolescent. All cortical and subcortical volumes showed significant inhomogeneity of variance between sexes, whereas a minority of brain regions showed significant sex differences in variance for cortical thickness, white matter volume, fractional anisotropy, and mean diffusivity. Previously reported sex differences in early adolescent regional human brain volume may, therefore, be driven by disparities in variance, rather than binary, sex-based phenotypes. This study builds upon previous findings illustrating the importance of considering variance when examining sex differences in brain structure.</p>","PeriodicalId":73341,"journal":{"name":"Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)","volume":"3 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12406053/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/IMAG.a.127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adolescent neuroimaging studies of sex differences in the human brain predominantly examine average differences between males and females. This focus on mean differences without probing relative distributions and similarities may contribute to both conflation and overestimation of sex differences and sexual dimorphism in the developing human brain. We aimed to characterize the variance in brain macro- and micro-structure in early adolescence as it pertains to sex at birth using a large sample of 9-11-year-olds from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study (N = 7,723). For global and regional estimates of gray and white matter volume, cortical thickness, and white matter microstructure (i.e., fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity), we examined: within- and between-sex variance, overlap between male and female distributions, inhomogeneity of variance, effect size, and CLES. We examined these sex differences using both unadjusted (raw) brain estimates and residualized brain estimates from mixed-effects modeling (adjusted) to account for variance better attributed to age, pubertal development, socioeconomic status, race, ethnicity, MRI scanner manufacturer, and total brain volume, where applicable. Contrary to the popular view of the brain as sexually dimorphic, we found high similarity and low difference between sexes in all regional measurements of brain structure examined after accounting for other sources of variance. However, the sex difference for adjusted total brain volume (TBV) had a medium effect size and a 71.9% probability that a randomly chosen male adolescent would have a larger brain than a randomly chosen female adolescent. All cortical and subcortical volumes showed significant inhomogeneity of variance between sexes, whereas a minority of brain regions showed significant sex differences in variance for cortical thickness, white matter volume, fractional anisotropy, and mean diffusivity. Previously reported sex differences in early adolescent regional human brain volume may, therefore, be driven by disparities in variance, rather than binary, sex-based phenotypes. This study builds upon previous findings illustrating the importance of considering variance when examining sex differences in brain structure.

相似多于差异:青少年早期大脑结构性别内与性别间差异的比较。
关于人类大脑性别差异的青少年神经成像研究主要检查男性和女性之间的平均差异。这种对平均差异的关注,而没有探究相对分布和相似性,可能会导致对发育中的人类大脑的性别差异和两性二态性的混淆和高估。我们的目的是描述青春期早期大脑宏观和微观结构的变化,因为它与出生时的性别有关,我们使用了来自青少年大脑认知发展(ABCD)研究(N = 7,723)的9-11岁儿童的大样本。对于灰质和白质体积、皮质厚度和白质微观结构(即分数各向异性和平均扩散率)的全球和区域估计,我们检查了:性别内和性别间方差、男性和女性分布的重叠、方差的不均匀性、效应大小和CLES。我们使用未调整的(原始的)大脑估计和混合效应模型(调整的)残差大脑估计来检验这些性别差异,以更好地解释年龄、青春期发育、社会经济地位、种族、民族、MRI扫描仪制造商和总脑容量(如适用)的差异。与普遍认为大脑是两性二态的观点相反,我们发现,在考虑了其他差异来源后,在所有大脑结构的区域测量中,性别之间的相似性很高,差异很低。然而,调整后的总脑容量(TBV)的性别差异具有中等效应大小,随机选择的男性青少年的大脑比随机选择的女性青少年的大脑大的概率为71.9%。所有的皮质和皮质下体积在性别之间表现出显著的不均匀性,而少数脑区在皮质厚度、白质体积、分数各向异性和平均扩散率方面表现出显著的性别差异。因此,先前报道的青少年早期区域人类脑容量的性别差异可能是由差异差异驱动的,而不是二元的、基于性别的表型。这项研究建立在先前的研究结果的基础上,说明了在检查大脑结构的性别差异时考虑差异的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信