Jie Jun Wong, Rilong Hong, Terence Ing Wei Ong, Jae-Young Lim, Tingting Yan, Duk-Woo Park, Gabrielle H N Tan, Hongzhou Zhang, Thu Thi Hoai Nguyen, Huong Thi Thu Nguyen, Yanhong Dong, William K F Kong, Shang Li, Jack W C Tan, Huyen Thi Thanh Vu, Angela S Koh
{"title":"Addressing Frailty in Cardiology: Identifying Barriers Faced by Cardiologists and Health Care Professionals in Asia.","authors":"Jie Jun Wong, Rilong Hong, Terence Ing Wei Ong, Jae-Young Lim, Tingting Yan, Duk-Woo Park, Gabrielle H N Tan, Hongzhou Zhang, Thu Thi Hoai Nguyen, Huong Thi Thu Nguyen, Yanhong Dong, William K F Kong, Shang Li, Jack W C Tan, Huyen Thi Thanh Vu, Angela S Koh","doi":"10.1016/j.jacasi.2025.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preventing frailty is crucial for improving outcomes in aging populations at heightened cardiovascular risk, yet implementation in real-world practice remains challenging. The authors previously reported low use of frailty strategies among cardiologists in Asia.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to explore the barriers to frailty implementation among cardiologists, other physicians, and nurses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multinational web-based survey was conducted targeting health care communities across Asia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 238 respondents (median age 34.0 years; IQR: 12 years; 63.4% women), 172 were doctors, 57 nurses, and 8 allied health professionals. Among doctors, 59 were cardiologists representing various subspecialties, including critical care cardiology, interventional cardiology, and general cardiology. Among all respondents, one-quarter lacked confidence in identifying (22.7%) or treating (28.2%) frailty, and many were uncertain of the screening tools (34.9%) and subsequent steps (37.8%). Other barriers include inadequate multidisciplinary support (21%), communication difficulties (45.8%), resource limitations (52.9%), patient and caregiver unreceptiveness (21.8%), and insufficient community care collaborations (39.5%). Compared with other physicians, cardiologists reported being too busy (P = 0.041) and having less awareness of screening selection (P = 0.018) and appropriate assessment tools (P = 0.008). Nurses experienced fewer interdisciplinary communication difficulties (P = 0.003) than cardiologists. There were no significant differences in understanding, support received, and patients' and caregivers' receptiveness toward frailty interventions between nurses and cardiologists.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Distinct barriers to frailty implementation exist at multiple levels, including gaps in provider expertise, insufficient support, and resource constraints that limit adequate frailty care provision. To address the diverse needs of stakeholders, a comprehensive implementation strategy leveraging interdisciplinary cardiogeriatric team resources and involving nurses could improve frailty care in cardiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":73529,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Asia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACC. Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacasi.2025.07.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Preventing frailty is crucial for improving outcomes in aging populations at heightened cardiovascular risk, yet implementation in real-world practice remains challenging. The authors previously reported low use of frailty strategies among cardiologists in Asia.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to explore the barriers to frailty implementation among cardiologists, other physicians, and nurses.
Methods: A multinational web-based survey was conducted targeting health care communities across Asia.
Results: Among 238 respondents (median age 34.0 years; IQR: 12 years; 63.4% women), 172 were doctors, 57 nurses, and 8 allied health professionals. Among doctors, 59 were cardiologists representing various subspecialties, including critical care cardiology, interventional cardiology, and general cardiology. Among all respondents, one-quarter lacked confidence in identifying (22.7%) or treating (28.2%) frailty, and many were uncertain of the screening tools (34.9%) and subsequent steps (37.8%). Other barriers include inadequate multidisciplinary support (21%), communication difficulties (45.8%), resource limitations (52.9%), patient and caregiver unreceptiveness (21.8%), and insufficient community care collaborations (39.5%). Compared with other physicians, cardiologists reported being too busy (P = 0.041) and having less awareness of screening selection (P = 0.018) and appropriate assessment tools (P = 0.008). Nurses experienced fewer interdisciplinary communication difficulties (P = 0.003) than cardiologists. There were no significant differences in understanding, support received, and patients' and caregivers' receptiveness toward frailty interventions between nurses and cardiologists.
Conclusions: Distinct barriers to frailty implementation exist at multiple levels, including gaps in provider expertise, insufficient support, and resource constraints that limit adequate frailty care provision. To address the diverse needs of stakeholders, a comprehensive implementation strategy leveraging interdisciplinary cardiogeriatric team resources and involving nurses could improve frailty care in cardiology.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
