Multicenter Practice of Non/Minimized Fluoroscopy Ablation for Paroxysmal AF in China: The PAF-ICE Trial.

Yunhe Wang, Deyong Long, Fangyi Xiao, Minglong Chen, Xingpeng Liu, Jidong Zhang, Yumei Xue, Jie Fan, Haixiong Wang, Mengzuo Wu, Rui Wang, Jia Li, Tao He, Weili Ge, Xiaobo Huang, Ruhong Jiang, Qiang Liu, Zuwen Zhang, Guosheng Fu, Chenyang Jiang
{"title":"Multicenter Practice of Non/Minimized Fluoroscopy Ablation for Paroxysmal AF in China: The PAF-ICE Trial.","authors":"Yunhe Wang, Deyong Long, Fangyi Xiao, Minglong Chen, Xingpeng Liu, Jidong Zhang, Yumei Xue, Jie Fan, Haixiong Wang, Mengzuo Wu, Rui Wang, Jia Li, Tao He, Weili Ge, Xiaobo Huang, Ruhong Jiang, Qiang Liu, Zuwen Zhang, Guosheng Fu, Chenyang Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.jacasi.2025.07.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE)-guided non/minimized-fluoroscopy catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) has been reported, but its effectiveness and safety still lack multicenter evidence.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The authors sought to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ICE-guided non/minimized-fluoroscopy catheter ablation compared with the traditional fluoroscopy-guided approach in patients with paroxysmal AF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 448 patients with paroxysmal AF, from 15 centers in China, were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to a non/minimized-fluoroscopy group (n = 223) and a traditional approach group (n = 225). The primary efficacy endpoint was freedom from AF recurrence after a single ablation procedure. The primary safety endpoint was a composite of death from any cause, stroke or transient ischemic attack, and other serious adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pulmonary vein isolation was achieved in all patients. After a median follow-up of 12.2 (Q1-Q3: 8.8-17.7) months, 184 of 223 patients (82.5%) in the non/minimized-fluoroscopy group and 189 of 225 (84.0%) in the traditional approach group remained free from arrhythmia. Cox analysis showed a HR of 0.949 (95% CI: 0.774 to 1.164); P = 0.858, demonstrating the noninferiority of the non/minimized-fluoroscopy approach. The primary safety endpoint did not differ significantly in the 2 groups (P = 0.975). This protocol enabled near zero-radiation procedures (mean <1 mGy) in 7 of 15 centers (46.7%), and radiation-free AF ablation in 125 of 223 patients (56.1%), significantly reducing x-ray exposure and operator radiation protection equipment usage.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ICE-combined non/minimized-fluoroscopy AF ablation was noninferior in effectiveness compared to traditional AF ablation, with no significant difference in safety endpoints, indicating its potential of widespread adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":73529,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Asia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACC. Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacasi.2025.07.011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE)-guided non/minimized-fluoroscopy catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) has been reported, but its effectiveness and safety still lack multicenter evidence.

Objectives: The authors sought to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ICE-guided non/minimized-fluoroscopy catheter ablation compared with the traditional fluoroscopy-guided approach in patients with paroxysmal AF.

Methods: A total of 448 patients with paroxysmal AF, from 15 centers in China, were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to a non/minimized-fluoroscopy group (n = 223) and a traditional approach group (n = 225). The primary efficacy endpoint was freedom from AF recurrence after a single ablation procedure. The primary safety endpoint was a composite of death from any cause, stroke or transient ischemic attack, and other serious adverse events.

Results: Pulmonary vein isolation was achieved in all patients. After a median follow-up of 12.2 (Q1-Q3: 8.8-17.7) months, 184 of 223 patients (82.5%) in the non/minimized-fluoroscopy group and 189 of 225 (84.0%) in the traditional approach group remained free from arrhythmia. Cox analysis showed a HR of 0.949 (95% CI: 0.774 to 1.164); P = 0.858, demonstrating the noninferiority of the non/minimized-fluoroscopy approach. The primary safety endpoint did not differ significantly in the 2 groups (P = 0.975). This protocol enabled near zero-radiation procedures (mean <1 mGy) in 7 of 15 centers (46.7%), and radiation-free AF ablation in 125 of 223 patients (56.1%), significantly reducing x-ray exposure and operator radiation protection equipment usage.

Conclusions: ICE-combined non/minimized-fluoroscopy AF ablation was noninferior in effectiveness compared to traditional AF ablation, with no significant difference in safety endpoints, indicating its potential of widespread adoption.

中国非/最小化透视消融治疗阵发性房颤的多中心实践:PAF-ICE试验
背景:心内超声心动图(ICE)引导下的非/最小化透视导管消融治疗房颤(AF)已有报道,但其有效性和安全性仍缺乏多中心证据。目的:作者试图评估ice引导下的非/最小化透视导管消融与传统透视入路治疗阵发性房颤的有效性和安全性。方法:来自中国15个中心的448例阵发性房颤患者,按1:1的比例随机分为非/最小化透视组(n = 223)和传统入路组(n = 225)。主要疗效终点是单次消融手术后房颤复发的自由。主要安全终点是任何原因导致的死亡、中风或短暂性脑缺血发作以及其他严重不良事件。结果:所有患者均获得肺静脉隔离。中位随访12.2 (Q1-Q3: 8.8-17.7)个月后,无/最小化透视组223例患者中184例(82.5%)和传统入路组225例患者中189例(84.0%)未出现心律失常。Cox分析显示HR为0.949 (95% CI: 0.774 ~ 1.164);P = 0.858,证明非/最小化透视入路的非劣效性。两组的主要安全终点无显著差异(P = 0.975)。结论:与传统的房颤消融相比,ice联合非/最小化透视房颤消融在有效性上并不逊色,在安全终点上没有显著差异,表明其广泛采用的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JACC. Asia
JACC. Asia Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信