Predictors of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty Efficacy Results from the Swedish Optimal SLT Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 3.2 Q2 Medicine
Tobias Dahlgren, Marcelo Ayala, Madeleine Zetterberg
{"title":"Predictors of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty Efficacy Results from the Swedish Optimal SLT Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Tobias Dahlgren, Marcelo Ayala, Madeleine Zetterberg","doi":"10.1016/j.ogla.2025.08.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the impact of potential predictor variables on selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) efficacy in the Swedish Optimal SLT (OSLT) trial.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Post hoc analysis of a multicenter, masked, randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>512 eyes from 399 patients enrolled in the OSLT trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were randomized to one of four SLT variants, differing in treatment extent (180° or 360°) and laser power (standard or high). Analyses were performed with linear mixed models (LMMs), which allowed optimal use of all the data and applied comprehensive adjustment to the results. A wide selection of potential predictors for SLT efficacy were first analyzed separately regarding their association with intraocular pressure reduction (IOPR). Predictors meeting a threshold of p<0.1 were then included in a multivariable candidate model, which was refined through manual stepwise backwards selection until only significant variables (p<0.05) remained. Thereafter, other variables of interest were evaluated in this model.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Mean IOPR 1-6 months after SLT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 360/high protocol remained the most efficacious SLT variant after adjustment for predictors (coefficient estimate (CE) 360/high 2.0, 360/standard 0.9, and 180/high -0.1, with 180/standard as the reference; p<0.001). Higher baseline IOP was a positive predictor for both absolute IOPR (CE 0.35; p<0.001), and relative IOPR (CE 0.72; p<0.001). A larger IOPR from the prior SLT (CE 0.18; p=0.004), as well as IOPR in the contralateral eye (CE 0.57; p<0.001) were also highly significant positive predictors. Conversely, the present analyses suggest that SLT efficacy is diminished by pseudoexfoliations (CE -0.69; p=0.02), the number of prior SLTs (CE -0.54; p=0.004), and increased corneal thickness (CE -0.01; p<0.002). Consultants/specialists and residents achieved similar SLT results, but individual surgeon performance mattered (p=0.003) as well as if the surgeon used the dominant hand (CE 0.35; p=0.050). However, age, glaucoma medication, cataract surgery, anterior chamber angle pigmentation, inflammatory symptoms, or postoperative anterior chamber flare had no correlation with SLT efficacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 360/high protocol remained the most effective and reliable technique after adjustment for multiple predictors. No evidence was found to advise against 360/high SLT for any particular group of patients. Selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) is a first line treatment for open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension (OHT).<sup>1-3</sup> SLT can be performed with different techniques (treatment protocols), primarily differing in the extent of the treatment area, the number of laser spots, and the principles for setting the laser power.<sup>4</sup> For years, there has been a lack of evidence for the optimal treatment technique. Therefore, we designed the Optimal SLT (OSLT) trial, which is a large randomized controlled multicenter trial performed in Sweden. The study included 513 eyes from 400 patients randomized to one of four alternative SLT protocols differing in treatment extent (180 or 360 degrees), and laser power (standard or high). The study participants constitute one of the largest prospective SLT cohorts in the world. The OSLT methodology and primary results have been reported previously.<sup>4</sup> The 360/high SLT protocol demonstrated a larger intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction (IOPR), a superior success rate, and a longer duration of effect, without reducing safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":56368,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology. Glaucoma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology. Glaucoma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogla.2025.08.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the impact of potential predictor variables on selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) efficacy in the Swedish Optimal SLT (OSLT) trial.

Design: Post hoc analysis of a multicenter, masked, randomized controlled trial.

Subjects: 512 eyes from 399 patients enrolled in the OSLT trial.

Methods: Patients were randomized to one of four SLT variants, differing in treatment extent (180° or 360°) and laser power (standard or high). Analyses were performed with linear mixed models (LMMs), which allowed optimal use of all the data and applied comprehensive adjustment to the results. A wide selection of potential predictors for SLT efficacy were first analyzed separately regarding their association with intraocular pressure reduction (IOPR). Predictors meeting a threshold of p<0.1 were then included in a multivariable candidate model, which was refined through manual stepwise backwards selection until only significant variables (p<0.05) remained. Thereafter, other variables of interest were evaluated in this model.

Main outcome measure: Mean IOPR 1-6 months after SLT.

Results: The 360/high protocol remained the most efficacious SLT variant after adjustment for predictors (coefficient estimate (CE) 360/high 2.0, 360/standard 0.9, and 180/high -0.1, with 180/standard as the reference; p<0.001). Higher baseline IOP was a positive predictor for both absolute IOPR (CE 0.35; p<0.001), and relative IOPR (CE 0.72; p<0.001). A larger IOPR from the prior SLT (CE 0.18; p=0.004), as well as IOPR in the contralateral eye (CE 0.57; p<0.001) were also highly significant positive predictors. Conversely, the present analyses suggest that SLT efficacy is diminished by pseudoexfoliations (CE -0.69; p=0.02), the number of prior SLTs (CE -0.54; p=0.004), and increased corneal thickness (CE -0.01; p<0.002). Consultants/specialists and residents achieved similar SLT results, but individual surgeon performance mattered (p=0.003) as well as if the surgeon used the dominant hand (CE 0.35; p=0.050). However, age, glaucoma medication, cataract surgery, anterior chamber angle pigmentation, inflammatory symptoms, or postoperative anterior chamber flare had no correlation with SLT efficacy.

Conclusions: The 360/high protocol remained the most effective and reliable technique after adjustment for multiple predictors. No evidence was found to advise against 360/high SLT for any particular group of patients. Selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) is a first line treatment for open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension (OHT).1-3 SLT can be performed with different techniques (treatment protocols), primarily differing in the extent of the treatment area, the number of laser spots, and the principles for setting the laser power.4 For years, there has been a lack of evidence for the optimal treatment technique. Therefore, we designed the Optimal SLT (OSLT) trial, which is a large randomized controlled multicenter trial performed in Sweden. The study included 513 eyes from 400 patients randomized to one of four alternative SLT protocols differing in treatment extent (180 or 360 degrees), and laser power (standard or high). The study participants constitute one of the largest prospective SLT cohorts in the world. The OSLT methodology and primary results have been reported previously.4 The 360/high SLT protocol demonstrated a larger intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction (IOPR), a superior success rate, and a longer duration of effect, without reducing safety.

选择性激光小梁成形术疗效的预测因素来自瑞典最佳SLT多中心随机对照试验。
目的:在瑞典最佳激光小梁成形术(OSLT)试验中,探讨潜在预测变量对选择性激光小梁成形术(SLT)疗效的影响。设计:一项多中心、盲法、随机对照试验的事后分析。受试者:参加OSLT试验的399例患者的512只眼睛。方法:根据治疗程度(180°或360°)和激光功率(标准或高)的不同,将患者随机分为四种SLT变体之一。采用线性混合模型(lmm)进行分析,使所有数据得到最佳利用,并对结果进行综合调整。我们首先对SLT疗效的多种潜在预测因素分别分析了它们与眼压降低(IOPR)的关系。主要结果测量:SLT后1-6个月的平均IOPR。结果:以180/标准为参考,调整预测因子(系数估计(CE) 360/高2.0、360/标准0.9和180/高-0.1)后,360/高方案仍然是最有效的SLT变体;结论:在调整多个预测因子后,360/high方案仍然是最有效和可靠的技术。没有证据表明反对针对任何特定患者群体的360/高SLT。选择性激光小梁成形术(SLT)是治疗开角型青光眼和高眼压的一线治疗方法。1-3 SLT可以用不同的技术(治疗方案)进行,主要在治疗区域的范围、激光光斑的数量和设置激光功率的原则上有所不同多年来,一直缺乏最佳治疗技术的证据。因此,我们设计了最优SLT (OSLT)试验,这是一项在瑞典进行的大型随机对照多中心试验。该研究包括来自400名患者的513只眼睛,随机分配到四种不同治疗程度(180度或360度)和激光功率(标准或高)的SLT方案之一。该研究的参与者构成了世界上最大的前瞻性SLT队列之一。OSLT的方法和初步结果已在以前报告过360/高SLT方案显示出更大的眼压(IOP)降低(IOPR),更高的成功率,更长的效果持续时间,而不降低安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ophthalmology. Glaucoma
Ophthalmology. Glaucoma Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
140
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信