Spanish Postpartum Bonding Questionnaire: further validation and proposal for a reduced version.

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Anna Torres-Giménez, Bàrbara Sureda, Alba Roca-Lecumberri, Susana Andrés-Perpiña, Estel Gelabert-Arbiol, Lluïsa Garcia-Esteve
{"title":"Spanish Postpartum Bonding Questionnaire: further validation and proposal for a reduced version.","authors":"Anna Torres-Giménez, Bàrbara Sureda, Alba Roca-Lecumberri, Susana Andrés-Perpiña, Estel Gelabert-Arbiol, Lluïsa Garcia-Esteve","doi":"10.1080/02646838.2025.2554127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims/background: </strong>The present study aims to address the limitations of previous Spanish validation studies of the Postpartum Bonding Questionnaire (PBQ), including limited diagnostic range and clinical severity, and inconsistent factor structures. Specifically, the aim of this further validation is twofold: to evaluate the factor structure of the PBQ in a sample of Spanish mothers to determine a replicable structure, and to validate the Spanish version of both the full PBQ (25 items) and a reduced 14-item version (PBQ14), in a sample of mothers with and without bonding disorders, including a broader range of bonding issues and more severe cases than in previous Spanish validations.</p><p><strong>Design/methods: </strong>Data were collected from two independent samples of mothers. A confirmatory factor analysis was conducted on a sample of 364 mothers to assess the validity of previously proposed PBQ factor structures. Additionally, criterion validity was evaluated in a sample of 162 mothers by comparing PBQ scores with bonding disorder diagnoses obtained through the Stafford Interview.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings confirm the validity of both the 25-item Spanish version (PBQ25) and the 14-item Japanese version (PBQ14) within the Spanish population. In the second sample, optimal total score cut-off points were identified: 19 or higher for the PBQ25 and 14 or higher for the PBQ14.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study further validates the Spanish version of the PBQ, confirming the factorial validity of the PBQ25 and proposing the PBQ14 as a short, versatile, and clinically useful screening tool for detecting mother-infant bonding disorders in the Spanish population.</p>","PeriodicalId":47721,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2025.2554127","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims/background: The present study aims to address the limitations of previous Spanish validation studies of the Postpartum Bonding Questionnaire (PBQ), including limited diagnostic range and clinical severity, and inconsistent factor structures. Specifically, the aim of this further validation is twofold: to evaluate the factor structure of the PBQ in a sample of Spanish mothers to determine a replicable structure, and to validate the Spanish version of both the full PBQ (25 items) and a reduced 14-item version (PBQ14), in a sample of mothers with and without bonding disorders, including a broader range of bonding issues and more severe cases than in previous Spanish validations.

Design/methods: Data were collected from two independent samples of mothers. A confirmatory factor analysis was conducted on a sample of 364 mothers to assess the validity of previously proposed PBQ factor structures. Additionally, criterion validity was evaluated in a sample of 162 mothers by comparing PBQ scores with bonding disorder diagnoses obtained through the Stafford Interview.

Results: The findings confirm the validity of both the 25-item Spanish version (PBQ25) and the 14-item Japanese version (PBQ14) within the Spanish population. In the second sample, optimal total score cut-off points were identified: 19 or higher for the PBQ25 and 14 or higher for the PBQ14.

Conclusion: This study further validates the Spanish version of the PBQ, confirming the factorial validity of the PBQ25 and proposing the PBQ14 as a short, versatile, and clinically useful screening tool for detecting mother-infant bonding disorders in the Spanish population.

西班牙产后亲密问卷:进一步验证并建议简化版本。
目的/背景:本研究旨在解决以往西班牙产后关系问卷(PBQ)验证研究的局限性,包括诊断范围和临床严重程度有限,以及因素结构不一致。具体来说,进一步验证的目的是双重的:在西班牙母亲样本中评估PBQ的因素结构以确定可复制的结构,并在有和没有结合障碍的母亲样本中验证完整PBQ的西班牙版本(25项)和减少的14项版本(PBQ14),包括更广泛的结合问题和比以前的西班牙验证更严重的病例。设计/方法:数据收集自两个独立的母亲样本。对364名母亲样本进行验证性因子分析,以评估先前提出的PBQ因子结构的有效性。此外,通过比较PBQ得分与通过斯塔福德访谈获得的结合障碍诊断,对162名母亲的样本进行了标准效度评估。结果:研究结果证实了25项西班牙语版(PBQ25)和14项日语版(PBQ14)在西班牙人群中的有效性。在第二个样本中,确定了最佳总分分界点:PBQ25为19分或更高,PBQ14为14分或更高。结论:本研究进一步验证了西班牙版本的PBQ,确认了PBQ25的析因效度,并提出PBQ14作为西班牙人群中检测母婴结合障碍的一种简短、通用和临床有用的筛查工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology
Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology reports and reviews outstanding research on psychological, behavioural, medical and social aspects of human reproduction, pregnancy and infancy. Medical topics focus on obstetrics and gynaecology, paediatrics and psychiatry. The growing work in relevant aspects of medical communication and medical sociology are also covered. Relevant psychological work includes developmental psychology, clinical psychology, social psychology, behavioural medicine, psychology of women and health psychology. Research into psychological aspects of midwifery, health visiting and nursing is central to the interests of the Journal. The Journal is of special value to those concerned with interdisciplinary issues. As a result, the Journal is of particular interest to those concerned with fundamental processes in behaviour and to issues of health promotion and service organization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信