Caring for carers of people with advanced cancer at hospital discharge (CARENET): A single-arm open label feasibility trial.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Celia Marston, Marc L'etang, Jennifer Philip, Deidre D Morgan, Lara Edbrooke, Sungwon Chang, Meera R Agar
{"title":"Caring for carers of people with advanced cancer at hospital discharge (CARENET): A single-arm open label feasibility trial.","authors":"Celia Marston, Marc L'etang, Jennifer Philip, Deidre D Morgan, Lara Edbrooke, Sungwon Chang, Meera R Agar","doi":"10.1017/S1478951525100710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Carers are critical to support discharge home from hospital at end of life yet remain under-represented in health service initiatives to assist this transition. A carer-focused intervention embedded into practice may facilitate hospital discharge. This open-labeled, single-arm phase 2 study aimed to determine the feasibility of (1) delivering a multi-staged intervention (CARENET) to carers of advanced cancer patients in a hospital setting and (2) the study design to inform a phase 3 trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CARENET, delivered before and after discharge to address carer support needs, was tested in an Australian specialist cancer hospital. Eligible participants included carers of advanced cancer inpatients with planned discharge home. The primary outcome was intervention and trial feasibility (recruitment and adherence). Secondary outcomes were eligibility and effects of intervention on outcomes including carer preparedness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 382 potential patient-carer dyads, 25 were recruited within required time frames. The intervention adherence outcome feasibility threshold of 80% of carer participants completing all 3 core components of CARENET was not achieved (60% completion). Trends in improvement in overall carer levels of preparedness were observed from baseline to discharge home (<i>n</i> = 12; mean [95% CI]) 0.5 [-0.0007, 1.007]). However, a downward trend in preparedness to provide emotional care after discharge was observed (<i>n</i> = 12; mean [95% CI] 0.25 [-0.30, 0.80]).</p><p><strong>Significance of results: </strong>Delivering all elements of the CARENET intervention to address carers' needs in the discharge planning context was not feasible. However, some elements were feasible, including identifying and responding to carer need, whilst completing elements after discharge were less feasible. Findings can be explained by problems with adherence, eligibility, and clinician barriers to fitting a multi-staged carer intervention into an acute healthcare setting. Future research should test a more adaptable intervention and delivery model that is accessible to all carers across and compatible with acute care settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":47898,"journal":{"name":"Palliative & Supportive Care","volume":"23 ","pages":"e156"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative & Supportive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951525100710","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Carers are critical to support discharge home from hospital at end of life yet remain under-represented in health service initiatives to assist this transition. A carer-focused intervention embedded into practice may facilitate hospital discharge. This open-labeled, single-arm phase 2 study aimed to determine the feasibility of (1) delivering a multi-staged intervention (CARENET) to carers of advanced cancer patients in a hospital setting and (2) the study design to inform a phase 3 trial.

Methods: CARENET, delivered before and after discharge to address carer support needs, was tested in an Australian specialist cancer hospital. Eligible participants included carers of advanced cancer inpatients with planned discharge home. The primary outcome was intervention and trial feasibility (recruitment and adherence). Secondary outcomes were eligibility and effects of intervention on outcomes including carer preparedness.

Results: Of the 382 potential patient-carer dyads, 25 were recruited within required time frames. The intervention adherence outcome feasibility threshold of 80% of carer participants completing all 3 core components of CARENET was not achieved (60% completion). Trends in improvement in overall carer levels of preparedness were observed from baseline to discharge home (n = 12; mean [95% CI]) 0.5 [-0.0007, 1.007]). However, a downward trend in preparedness to provide emotional care after discharge was observed (n = 12; mean [95% CI] 0.25 [-0.30, 0.80]).

Significance of results: Delivering all elements of the CARENET intervention to address carers' needs in the discharge planning context was not feasible. However, some elements were feasible, including identifying and responding to carer need, whilst completing elements after discharge were less feasible. Findings can be explained by problems with adherence, eligibility, and clinician barriers to fitting a multi-staged carer intervention into an acute healthcare setting. Future research should test a more adaptable intervention and delivery model that is accessible to all carers across and compatible with acute care settings.

晚期癌症患者出院时的护理(CARENET):单臂开放标签可行性试验。
目标:护理人员对支持生命结束时出院回家至关重要,但在协助这一过渡的卫生服务倡议中,代表性仍然不足。将以职业为中心的干预措施纳入实践,可促进出院。这项开放标签的单臂2期研究旨在确定(1)向医院环境中晚期癌症患者的护理人员提供多阶段干预(CARENET)的可行性,以及(2)为3期试验提供研究设计。方法:在澳大利亚一家癌症专科医院对出院前后提供的CARENET进行了测试,以满足护理人员的支持需求。符合条件的参与者包括计划出院的晚期癌症住院患者的护理人员。主要结局是干预和试验的可行性(招募和依从性)。次要结果是合格性和干预对结果的影响,包括照顾者准备。结果:在382名潜在的患者-护理人员中,25人在规定的时间内被招募。干预依从性结果的可行性阈值(80%的护理参与者完成了CARENET的所有3个核心组成部分)没有达到(60%完成)。从基线到出院,观察到总体护理人员准备水平的改善趋势(n = 12;平均[95% CI]) 0.5[-0.0007, 1.007])。然而,出院后提供情感护理的准备呈下降趋势(n = 12;平均[95% CI] 0.25[-0.30, 0.80])。结果的意义:在出院计划的背景下,提供CARENET干预的所有要素来解决护理人员的需求是不可实现的。然而,一些要素是可行的,包括识别和响应护理者的需求,而在出院后完成要素则不太可行。研究结果可以用依从性、资格和临床医生在将多阶段护理干预纳入急性医疗保健环境方面的障碍来解释。未来的研究应该测试一种适应性更强的干预和交付模式,使所有护理人员都能使用,并与急性护理环境兼容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Palliative & Supportive Care
Palliative & Supportive Care HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
280
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信