Enhancing GP consultation skills training: educational evaluation of a conversational AI innovation for simulated consultation assessment preparation.

IF 1.1 Q3 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
C Jacobs, K Hazra, A Singh
{"title":"Enhancing GP consultation skills training: educational evaluation of a conversational AI innovation for simulated consultation assessment preparation.","authors":"C Jacobs, K Hazra, A Singh","doi":"10.1080/14739879.2025.2551207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Simulated Consultation Assessment (SCA) preparation is critical for GP trainees, with the traditional approach relying on trained medical actors. However, limited actor availability, scheduling constraints and high costs often restrict practice opportunities. This evaluation aimed to assess a conversational artificial intelligent (AI) system as an educational tool for GP consultation skills training, examining its acceptability, perceived educational impact and implementation considerations for training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an educational innovation evaluation with GP trainees and educators (<i>n</i> = 22) following implementation of a conversational AI simulation system for SCA preparation. The evaluation employed a mixed-methods design incorporating validated educational assessment measures across four domains: clinical authenticity, educational utility, user experience and technical performance. Participants' perspectives were captured through structured questionnaires and open-ended feedback. Implementation considerations were assessed through cost-comparison analysis with traditional training methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This educational innovation demonstrated strong acceptability among users, with particularly positive evaluations for clinical content authenticity (median 4.5, IQR 4-5) and educational value (median 4.5, IQR 4-5). Qualitative feedback revealed that the innovation successfully addressed key training needs, particularly around accessibility and practice frequency. More experienced educators (11+ years) rated the innovation significantly higher for educational utility (<i>p</i> < 0.05), suggesting potential for curriculum integration. The implementation analysis revealed resource advantages, with 24-84% cost reductions compared to traditional methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This conversational AI innovation offers GP educators a practical, cost-effective solution to training challenges, potentially addressing the modality mismatch between face-to-face training and video-based examinations. Implementation should focus on integration as a complementary curriculum tool, with ongoing evaluation of educational outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":46436,"journal":{"name":"Education for Primary Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education for Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14739879.2025.2551207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Simulated Consultation Assessment (SCA) preparation is critical for GP trainees, with the traditional approach relying on trained medical actors. However, limited actor availability, scheduling constraints and high costs often restrict practice opportunities. This evaluation aimed to assess a conversational artificial intelligent (AI) system as an educational tool for GP consultation skills training, examining its acceptability, perceived educational impact and implementation considerations for training.

Methods: We conducted an educational innovation evaluation with GP trainees and educators (n = 22) following implementation of a conversational AI simulation system for SCA preparation. The evaluation employed a mixed-methods design incorporating validated educational assessment measures across four domains: clinical authenticity, educational utility, user experience and technical performance. Participants' perspectives were captured through structured questionnaires and open-ended feedback. Implementation considerations were assessed through cost-comparison analysis with traditional training methods.

Results: This educational innovation demonstrated strong acceptability among users, with particularly positive evaluations for clinical content authenticity (median 4.5, IQR 4-5) and educational value (median 4.5, IQR 4-5). Qualitative feedback revealed that the innovation successfully addressed key training needs, particularly around accessibility and practice frequency. More experienced educators (11+ years) rated the innovation significantly higher for educational utility (p < 0.05), suggesting potential for curriculum integration. The implementation analysis revealed resource advantages, with 24-84% cost reductions compared to traditional methods.

Conclusion: This conversational AI innovation offers GP educators a practical, cost-effective solution to training challenges, potentially addressing the modality mismatch between face-to-face training and video-based examinations. Implementation should focus on integration as a complementary curriculum tool, with ongoing evaluation of educational outcomes.

加强全科医生咨询技能培训:模拟咨询评估准备的会话式人工智能创新的教育评价。
背景:模拟会诊评估(SCA)的准备对全科医生学员至关重要,传统的方法依赖于训练有素的医疗行为者。然而,有限的演员可用性、调度约束和高成本往往限制了实践机会。本评估旨在评估会话人工智能(AI)系统作为全科医生咨询技能培训的教育工具,检查其可接受性,感知的教育影响和培训实施考虑因素。方法:我们对全科医生学员和教育工作者(n = 22)进行了教育创新评估,随后实施了用于SCA准备的会话AI模拟系统。评估采用混合方法设计,包括四个领域的验证教育评估措施:临床真实性,教育效用,用户体验和技术性能。参与者的观点通过结构化的问卷调查和开放式的反馈得到。通过与传统培训方法的成本比较分析评估了执行方面的考虑。结果:这一教育创新在用户中表现出很强的可接受性,在临床内容真实性(中位数4.5,IQR 4-5)和教育价值(中位数4.5,IQR 4-5)方面获得了特别积极的评价。定性反馈显示,创新成功地解决了关键的培训需求,特别是在可访问性和练习频率方面。更有经验的教育工作者(11年以上)对该创新的教育效用评价更高(p结论:这种对话式人工智能创新为全科医生教育工作者提供了一种实用的、具有成本效益的培训挑战解决方案,潜在地解决了面对面培训和视频考试之间的模式不匹配问题。实施的重点应放在作为补充课程工具的整合上,并对教育成果进行持续评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Education for Primary Care
Education for Primary Care PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Education for Primary Care aims to reflect the best experience, expertise and innovative ideas in the development of undergraduate, postgraduate and continuing primary care education. The journal is UK based but welcomes contributions from all over the world. Readers will benefit from the broader perspectives on educational activities provided through the contributions of all health professionals, including general practitioners, nurses, midwives, health visitors, community nurses and managers. This sharing of experiences has the potential for enhancing healthcare delivery and for promoting interprofessional working.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信