How is wakeful rest operationalized and measured in daily life among adults with and without long-term conditions? A systematic scoping review.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
PM&R Pub Date : 2025-09-04 DOI:10.1002/pmrj.70008
Martin Ackah, Katie L Hackett, Vincent Deary, Florentina Johanna Hettinga, Hosea Boakye, Ulric Sena Abonie
{"title":"How is wakeful rest operationalized and measured in daily life among adults with and without long-term conditions? A systematic scoping review.","authors":"Martin Ackah, Katie L Hackett, Vincent Deary, Florentina Johanna Hettinga, Hosea Boakye, Ulric Sena Abonie","doi":"10.1002/pmrj.70008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A systematic scoping review was conducted to examine how rest is operationalized and measured in daily life among adults with and without long-term conditions. Searches were performed in PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Psych databases for studies from 1990 to 2024. Two independent reviewers screened and selected eligible studies, which included adults with and without long-term conditions. A content analysis was used to synthesize qualitative and quantitative evidence, categorizing rest-related descriptions. Additionally, descriptive and narrative synthesis methods were employed. Of 9393 initial records, 17 studies were included in the review. The findings revealed that rest was operationalized by several key elements, including cessation of activity or engagement in low-energy tasks (n = 9 studies); detachment from activities (n = 4 studies); experiences of peace, joy, and tranquility (n = 5 studies); and time for self-reflection and solitude (n = 2 studies). The operationalization of rest showed both similarities and differences between adults with and without long-term conditions. Although all groups defined rest in physical, emotional, and social terms, mental rest was more prominently emphasized by adults without long-term conditions. The review also identified the effects of rest, including improvements in well-being and psychological functioning (n = 4 studies) and enhanced energy levels that facilitated daily activities (n = 4 studies). However, \"excessive\" rest was linked to negative outcomes, such as increased physical symptoms and disability (n = 3 studies). Notably, only two studies assessed rest measurement tools for adults with long-term conditions. The findings suggest that rest can enhance energy, well-being, and functioning, but excessive rest may worsen physical symptoms and disability. Tailored guidance on optimal rest is essential for maximizing health benefits. The review also highlights the need for further research on comprehensive tools to measure rest.</p>","PeriodicalId":20354,"journal":{"name":"PM&R","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PM&R","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.70008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A systematic scoping review was conducted to examine how rest is operationalized and measured in daily life among adults with and without long-term conditions. Searches were performed in PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Psych databases for studies from 1990 to 2024. Two independent reviewers screened and selected eligible studies, which included adults with and without long-term conditions. A content analysis was used to synthesize qualitative and quantitative evidence, categorizing rest-related descriptions. Additionally, descriptive and narrative synthesis methods were employed. Of 9393 initial records, 17 studies were included in the review. The findings revealed that rest was operationalized by several key elements, including cessation of activity or engagement in low-energy tasks (n = 9 studies); detachment from activities (n = 4 studies); experiences of peace, joy, and tranquility (n = 5 studies); and time for self-reflection and solitude (n = 2 studies). The operationalization of rest showed both similarities and differences between adults with and without long-term conditions. Although all groups defined rest in physical, emotional, and social terms, mental rest was more prominently emphasized by adults without long-term conditions. The review also identified the effects of rest, including improvements in well-being and psychological functioning (n = 4 studies) and enhanced energy levels that facilitated daily activities (n = 4 studies). However, "excessive" rest was linked to negative outcomes, such as increased physical symptoms and disability (n = 3 studies). Notably, only two studies assessed rest measurement tools for adults with long-term conditions. The findings suggest that rest can enhance energy, well-being, and functioning, but excessive rest may worsen physical symptoms and disability. Tailored guidance on optimal rest is essential for maximizing health benefits. The review also highlights the need for further research on comprehensive tools to measure rest.

在有和没有长期疾病的成年人中,清醒休息是如何在日常生活中运作和测量的?系统的范围审查。
一个系统的范围审查进行了检查休息是如何操作和测量在日常生活中的成年人有和没有长期条件。在PubMed、护理和相关健康文献累积索引和心理学数据库中检索1990年至2024年的研究。两名独立审稿人筛选并选择了符合条件的研究,其中包括有和没有长期疾病的成年人。内容分析用于综合定性和定量证据,对休息相关描述进行分类。此外,还采用了描述性和叙事性的综合方法。在9393份初始记录中,17份研究纳入了本综述。研究结果显示,休息是由几个关键因素操作的,包括停止活动或从事低能量任务(n = 9项研究);脱离活动(n = 4项研究);和平、快乐和宁静的体验(n = 5项研究);还有自我反省和独处的时间(n = 2项研究)。在有和没有长期条件的成年人中,休息的操作化既有相似之处,也有差异。虽然所有的群体都从身体、情感和社会的角度来定义休息,但没有长期疾病的成年人更强调精神上的休息。该综述还确定了休息的影响,包括改善幸福感和心理功能(n = 4项研究),提高能量水平,促进日常活动(n = 4项研究)。然而,“过度”休息与负面结果有关,如身体症状增加和残疾(n = 3项研究)。值得注意的是,只有两项研究评估了患有长期疾病的成年人的休息测量工具。研究结果表明,休息可以增强能量、幸福感和功能,但过度休息可能会加重身体症状和残疾。量身定制的最佳休息指导对于最大限度地提高健康效益至关重要。该综述还强调需要进一步研究测量休息的综合工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PM&R
PM&R REHABILITATION-SPORT SCIENCES
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Topics covered include acute and chronic musculoskeletal disorders and pain, neurologic conditions involving the central and peripheral nervous systems, rehabilitation of impairments associated with disabilities in adults and children, and neurophysiology and electrodiagnosis. PM&R emphasizes principles of injury, function, and rehabilitation, and is designed to be relevant to practitioners and researchers in a variety of medical and surgical specialties and rehabilitation disciplines including allied health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信