How do I implement a whole blood program with low blood wastage?

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Transfusion Pub Date : 2025-09-05 DOI:10.1111/trf.18402
Denise Bäckström, Malin Jonsson Fagerlund, Stella Larsson, Aseel Alshamari, Ragnar Henningsson, Karin Holst, Anna-Maria Harstad, Norbert Lubenow, José-Gabriel Sato Folatre, Pia Remneberg Carlbom, Agneta Wikman
{"title":"How do I implement a whole blood program with low blood wastage?","authors":"Denise Bäckström, Malin Jonsson Fagerlund, Stella Larsson, Aseel Alshamari, Ragnar Henningsson, Karin Holst, Anna-Maria Harstad, Norbert Lubenow, José-Gabriel Sato Folatre, Pia Remneberg Carlbom, Agneta Wikman","doi":"10.1111/trf.18402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of low-titer O whole blood (LTOWB) is requested in the treatment of major bleeding, initially used in military medicine but now increasingly utilized in civilian prehospital care. The advantage is the administration of a balanced transfusion, red blood cells, coagulation factors, and platelets, in one bag. The challenges are the availability of LTOWB and difficulties in predicting the need in major bleeding, leading to the risk of wastage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study describes different logistical strategies when implementing whole blood in the Swedish civilian healthcare. The five transfusion centers producing whole blood in Sweden participated, providing experience of the production line, usage, and wastage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Sweden, LTOWB is used prehospital in helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS), in one physician-manned rapid response vehicle, and inhospital in three University Hospitals. The logistical strategies to reduce wastage vary but involve the rotation of LTOWB not used prehospital to inhospital use in two centers and the preparation of red blood cell (RBC) units from 1 to 2 weeks old LTOWB in three centers. The number of transfused LTOWB units varies between the centers, and wastage was 0%-13% in 4/5 centers and higher in one center, 34%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is difficult to predict the need of LTOWB, requested in prehospital emergencies. Aiming for low wastage requires different logistical chains, depending on the local prerequisites. In Sweden, LTOWB is either rotated for use in major bleeding in hospital or prepared to RBC units after 1 week prehospital.</p>","PeriodicalId":23266,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.18402","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The use of low-titer O whole blood (LTOWB) is requested in the treatment of major bleeding, initially used in military medicine but now increasingly utilized in civilian prehospital care. The advantage is the administration of a balanced transfusion, red blood cells, coagulation factors, and platelets, in one bag. The challenges are the availability of LTOWB and difficulties in predicting the need in major bleeding, leading to the risk of wastage.

Methods: This study describes different logistical strategies when implementing whole blood in the Swedish civilian healthcare. The five transfusion centers producing whole blood in Sweden participated, providing experience of the production line, usage, and wastage.

Results: In Sweden, LTOWB is used prehospital in helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS), in one physician-manned rapid response vehicle, and inhospital in three University Hospitals. The logistical strategies to reduce wastage vary but involve the rotation of LTOWB not used prehospital to inhospital use in two centers and the preparation of red blood cell (RBC) units from 1 to 2 weeks old LTOWB in three centers. The number of transfused LTOWB units varies between the centers, and wastage was 0%-13% in 4/5 centers and higher in one center, 34%.

Conclusion: It is difficult to predict the need of LTOWB, requested in prehospital emergencies. Aiming for low wastage requires different logistical chains, depending on the local prerequisites. In Sweden, LTOWB is either rotated for use in major bleeding in hospital or prepared to RBC units after 1 week prehospital.

如何以低血液浪费的方式实施全血计划?
背景:低滴度O型全血(LTOWB)在大出血的治疗中被要求使用,最初用于军事医学,但现在越来越多地用于民用院前护理。其优点是在一个袋子内平衡输血、红细胞、凝血因子和血小板。面临的挑战是LTOWB的可用性和预测大出血需要的困难,导致浪费的风险。方法:本研究描述了在瑞典平民医疗保健中实施全血时的不同后勤策略。瑞典五家生产全血的输血中心参与其中,提供了全血生产线、使用和浪费的经验。结果:在瑞典,LTOWB在院前直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS)、一辆医生驾驶的快速反应车和三所大学医院的院内使用。减少浪费的后勤策略各不相同,但包括在两个中心轮流使用院前未使用的LTOWB到院内使用,以及在三个中心准备1至2周的LTOWB红细胞(RBC)单位。各中心输注LTOWB单位的数量各不相同,4/5个中心的浪费为0%-13%,一个中心的浪费更高,为34%。结论:院前急症患者对LTOWB的需求难以预测。为了实现低浪费,需要不同的物流链,这取决于当地的先决条件。在瑞典,LTOWB要么轮转用于院内大出血,要么在院前1周后准备到RBC单位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transfusion
Transfusion 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
20.70%
发文量
426
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: TRANSFUSION is the foremost publication in the world for new information regarding transfusion medicine. Written by and for members of AABB and other health-care workers, TRANSFUSION reports on the latest technical advances, discusses opposing viewpoints regarding controversial issues, and presents key conference proceedings. In addition to blood banking and transfusion medicine topics, TRANSFUSION presents submissions concerning patient blood management, tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular, and gene therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信