Clinical outcomes and independently adjudicated results of M2 aspiration thrombectomy: a subgroup analysis from the Imperative Trial.

IF 4.3 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING
Justin R Mascitelli, Reade Andrew De Leacy, William Mack, Raul Nogueira, Shahram Majidi, Robert Dana Tomalty, Maxim Mokin, Jan Vargas, Brett L Cucchiara, Kenneth V Snyder, Victoria Parada, Hakeem J Shakir, David Rosenbaum-Halevi, Amin Aghaebrahim, Daniel Hoit, Benjamin Yim, Matthew S Tenser, Alhamza R Al-Bayati, James M Milburn, Shahid M Nimjee, Neil Haranhalli, Michael Nahhas, Darryn Shaff, Kennith F Layton, Narlin Beaty, Robert M Starke, Harris Hawk, Diogo C Haussen, Aqueel Pabaney, Christopher Paul Kellner, Jonathan A Grossberg
{"title":"Clinical outcomes and independently adjudicated results of M2 aspiration thrombectomy: a subgroup analysis from the Imperative Trial.","authors":"Justin R Mascitelli, Reade Andrew De Leacy, William Mack, Raul Nogueira, Shahram Majidi, Robert Dana Tomalty, Maxim Mokin, Jan Vargas, Brett L Cucchiara, Kenneth V Snyder, Victoria Parada, Hakeem J Shakir, David Rosenbaum-Halevi, Amin Aghaebrahim, Daniel Hoit, Benjamin Yim, Matthew S Tenser, Alhamza R Al-Bayati, James M Milburn, Shahid M Nimjee, Neil Haranhalli, Michael Nahhas, Darryn Shaff, Kennith F Layton, Narlin Beaty, Robert M Starke, Harris Hawk, Diogo C Haussen, Aqueel Pabaney, Christopher Paul Kellner, Jonathan A Grossberg","doi":"10.1136/jnis-2025-024023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The ESCAPE-MeVO (Endovascular Treatment to Improve Outcomes for Medium Vessel Occlusions) and DISTAL (Endovascular Therapy plus Best Medical Treatment vs Best Medical Treatment Alone for Medium Vessel Occlusion Stroke) trials failed to demonstrate the superiority of endovascular thrombectomy over best medical management for medium and small vessel occlusions. Potential limitations of these trials include older patient populations, lower presenting National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores, higher rates of premorbid disability, delayed revascularization times, inclusion of both medium and small vessel occlusions, and widespread use of stent retrievers. Here we present M2 occlusion data from the Imperative Trial, evaluating aspiration thrombectomy with the Zoom System.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Imperative Trial is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm trial with independent core lab and safety board adjudication, evaluating aspiration thrombectomy with the Zoom System (Imperative Care, Campbell, CA, USA) for large vessel, including M2, occlusions. This subanalysis includes patients with primary M2 occlusions. Angiographic outcomes were defined as modified Treatment in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) score ≥2b (good) and ≥2c (excellent). Clinical outcomes were defined as modified Rankin Scale score (mRS) 0-2 (good) and 0-1 (excellent) at 90 days. Safety was assessed by all-cause mortality, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and all hemorrhage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 260 enrolled patients, 25% (65/260) had primary M2 occlusions. Median age was 69 years; median NIHSS was 13. Good and excellent reperfusion were achieved in 88% (57/65) and 66% (43/65), respectively. At 90 days, good and excellent clinical outcomes occurred in 62% (39/63) and 56% (35/63), respectively. Mortality, sICH, and any hemorrhage were 4.6% (3/65), 1.5% (1/65), and 18% (12/65), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Zoom System demonstrated excellent safety and efficacy in M2 occlusions. These findings support aspiration thrombectomy for M2 occlusions as a viable treatment in well-selected patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2025-024023","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The ESCAPE-MeVO (Endovascular Treatment to Improve Outcomes for Medium Vessel Occlusions) and DISTAL (Endovascular Therapy plus Best Medical Treatment vs Best Medical Treatment Alone for Medium Vessel Occlusion Stroke) trials failed to demonstrate the superiority of endovascular thrombectomy over best medical management for medium and small vessel occlusions. Potential limitations of these trials include older patient populations, lower presenting National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores, higher rates of premorbid disability, delayed revascularization times, inclusion of both medium and small vessel occlusions, and widespread use of stent retrievers. Here we present M2 occlusion data from the Imperative Trial, evaluating aspiration thrombectomy with the Zoom System.

Methods: The Imperative Trial is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm trial with independent core lab and safety board adjudication, evaluating aspiration thrombectomy with the Zoom System (Imperative Care, Campbell, CA, USA) for large vessel, including M2, occlusions. This subanalysis includes patients with primary M2 occlusions. Angiographic outcomes were defined as modified Treatment in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) score ≥2b (good) and ≥2c (excellent). Clinical outcomes were defined as modified Rankin Scale score (mRS) 0-2 (good) and 0-1 (excellent) at 90 days. Safety was assessed by all-cause mortality, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and all hemorrhage.

Results: Of 260 enrolled patients, 25% (65/260) had primary M2 occlusions. Median age was 69 years; median NIHSS was 13. Good and excellent reperfusion were achieved in 88% (57/65) and 66% (43/65), respectively. At 90 days, good and excellent clinical outcomes occurred in 62% (39/63) and 56% (35/63), respectively. Mortality, sICH, and any hemorrhage were 4.6% (3/65), 1.5% (1/65), and 18% (12/65), respectively.

Conclusions: The Zoom System demonstrated excellent safety and efficacy in M2 occlusions. These findings support aspiration thrombectomy for M2 occlusions as a viable treatment in well-selected patients.

临床结果和独立判定的M2抽吸取栓结果:势在必行试验的亚组分析。
背景:ESCAPE-MeVO(血管内治疗改善中等血管闭塞的预后)和远端(血管内治疗加最佳药物治疗vs单独最佳药物治疗中血管闭塞卒中)试验未能证明血管内取栓优于最佳药物治疗中、小血管闭塞。这些试验的潜在局限性包括老年患者群体、较低的美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分、较高的病前致残率、延迟的血运重建时间、中、小血管闭塞的纳入以及支架回收器的广泛使用。在这里,我们提供了来自Imperative试验的M2闭塞数据,评估了Zoom系统的吸入性取栓术。方法:Imperative试验是一项前瞻性、多中心、单臂试验,有独立的核心实验室和安全委员会裁决,评估Zoom系统(Imperative Care, Campbell, CA, USA)对包括M2在内的大血管闭塞的吸入性血栓切除术。该亚组分析包括原发性M2闭塞患者。血管造影结果定义为改良脑梗死治疗(mTICI)评分≥2b(良好)和≥2c(优秀)。临床结果定义为90天的改良Rankin量表评分(mRS) 0-2(良好)和0-1(极好)。安全性通过全因死亡率、症状性颅内出血(siich)和所有出血来评估。结果:260例入组患者中,25%(65/260)有原发性M2闭塞。中位年龄为69岁;NIHSS中位数为13。良好再灌注率为88%(57/65),优良再灌注率为66%(43/65)。在第90天,62%(39/63)和56%(35/63)的患者出现良好和优异的临床结果。死亡率为4.6% (3/65),sICH为1.5%(1/65),出血为18%(12/65)。结论:变焦系统治疗M2闭塞具有良好的安全性和有效性。这些发现支持抽吸取栓治疗M2闭塞是一种可行的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
14.60%
发文量
291
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery (JNIS) is a leading peer review journal for scientific research and literature pertaining to the field of neurointerventional surgery. The journal launch follows growing professional interest in neurointerventional techniques for the treatment of a range of neurological and vascular problems including stroke, aneurysms, brain tumors, and spinal compression.The journal is owned by SNIS and is also the official journal of the Interventional Chapter of the Australian and New Zealand Society of Neuroradiology (ANZSNR), the Canadian Interventional Neuro Group, the Hong Kong Neurological Society (HKNS) and the Neuroradiological Society of Taiwan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信