Systemic immune-inflammation index and risk of gestational diabetes and preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-05 DOI:10.1080/01443615.2025.2548814
Tingting Zhang, Xingxing He
{"title":"Systemic immune-inflammation index and risk of gestational diabetes and preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Tingting Zhang, Xingxing He","doi":"10.1080/01443615.2025.2548814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) has been a marker and prognostic indicator of several diseases. However, its utility in pregnancy is unknown. Herein, we reviewed the evidence on the ability of SII to predict gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and preeclampsia (PE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science was conducted for studies comparing SII between GDM/PE and non-GDM/non-PE groups. Studies reporting diagnostic accuracy data were also included. The last date of the search was 5 November 2024. Risk of bias was assessed using Newcastle Ottawa Scale. Random-effect meta-analysis was conducted comparing values of SII between GDM/PE and non-GDM/non-PE groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine studies were eligible. Four studies reported data on GDM and five on PE. Most studies measured SII in the first trimester. The pooled analysis showed no statistically significant difference in the SII values between PE and non-PE groups (MD: 13.07, 95% confidence interval (CI): -117.21, 143.35, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 78%). Meta-analysis of four studies comparing data of GDM and non-GDM groups showed that SII was significantly higher in GDM females (MD: 210.32, 95% CI: 57.3, 363.34, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 94%). The sensitivity of SII to predict PE varied from 40 to 77.5% while specificity varied from 53.8 to 67.5%. For studies on GDM, the sensitivity and specificity values varied from 66 to 80.2% and 34.4 to 65%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SII values are significantly higher in GDM compared to non-GDM females. However, SII values did not correlate with PE. SII may have potential in predicting GDM which needs to be explored by further studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":16627,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"45 1","pages":"2548814"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2025.2548814","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) has been a marker and prognostic indicator of several diseases. However, its utility in pregnancy is unknown. Herein, we reviewed the evidence on the ability of SII to predict gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and preeclampsia (PE).

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science was conducted for studies comparing SII between GDM/PE and non-GDM/non-PE groups. Studies reporting diagnostic accuracy data were also included. The last date of the search was 5 November 2024. Risk of bias was assessed using Newcastle Ottawa Scale. Random-effect meta-analysis was conducted comparing values of SII between GDM/PE and non-GDM/non-PE groups.

Results: Nine studies were eligible. Four studies reported data on GDM and five on PE. Most studies measured SII in the first trimester. The pooled analysis showed no statistically significant difference in the SII values between PE and non-PE groups (MD: 13.07, 95% confidence interval (CI): -117.21, 143.35, I2 = 78%). Meta-analysis of four studies comparing data of GDM and non-GDM groups showed that SII was significantly higher in GDM females (MD: 210.32, 95% CI: 57.3, 363.34, I2 = 94%). The sensitivity of SII to predict PE varied from 40 to 77.5% while specificity varied from 53.8 to 67.5%. For studies on GDM, the sensitivity and specificity values varied from 66 to 80.2% and 34.4 to 65%, respectively.

Conclusions: SII values are significantly higher in GDM compared to non-GDM females. However, SII values did not correlate with PE. SII may have potential in predicting GDM which needs to be explored by further studies.

全身免疫炎症指数与妊娠糖尿病和先兆子痫的风险:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景:全身免疫炎症指数(SII)已成为多种疾病的标志和预后指标。然而,它在怀孕中的效用尚不清楚。在此,我们回顾了SII预测妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)和先兆子痫(PE)能力的证据。方法:系统检索PubMed、Embase、Scopus和Web of Science,比较GDM/PE组和非GDM/非PE组的SII。报告诊断准确性数据的研究也包括在内。最后一次搜索日期是2024年11月5日。偏倚风险采用纽卡斯尔渥太华量表进行评估。采用随机效应meta分析比较GDM/PE组与非GDM/非PE组的SII值。结果:9项研究符合条件。四项研究报告了GDM的数据,五项研究报告了PE的数据。大多数研究在妊娠的前三个月测量SII。合并分析显示,PE组与非PE组SII值差异无统计学意义(MD: 13.07, 95%可信区间(CI): -117.21, 143.35, I2 = 78%)。四项比较GDM组和非GDM组数据的研究荟萃分析显示,GDM女性的SII明显更高(MD: 210.32, 95% CI: 57.3, 363.34, I2 = 94%)。SII预测PE的敏感性为40 ~ 77.5%,特异性为53.8 ~ 67.5%。对于GDM的研究,敏感性和特异性值分别为66 ~ 80.2%和34.4 ~ 65%。结论:GDM女性的SII值明显高于非GDM女性。然而,SII值与PE无关。SII可能具有预测GDM的潜力,这需要进一步的研究来探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
398
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology represents an established forum for the entire field of obstetrics and gynaecology, publishing a broad range of original, peer-reviewed papers, from scientific and clinical research to reviews relevant to practice. It also includes occasional supplements on clinical symposia. The journal is read widely by trainees in our specialty and we acknowledge a major role in education in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Past and present editors have recognized the difficulties that junior doctors encounter in achieving their first publications and spend time advising authors during their initial attempts at submission. The journal continues to attract a world-wide readership thanks to the emphasis on practical applicability and its excellent record of drawing on an international base of authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信