Effects of Aerobic Exercise on Physical Fitness in Obesity Using Fox vs. Tanaka's Maximum Heart Rate and Percentage vs. Karvonen Methods.

Q1 Health Professions
International journal of exercise science Pub Date : 2025-09-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.70252/XEPS8890
Maninthorn Rugbumrung, Tavarintorn Rukbumrung, Sittiwit Impanya, Adison Thurayot
{"title":"Effects of Aerobic Exercise on Physical Fitness in Obesity Using Fox vs. Tanaka's Maximum Heart Rate and Percentage vs. Karvonen Methods.","authors":"Maninthorn Rugbumrung, Tavarintorn Rukbumrung, Sittiwit Impanya, Adison Thurayot","doi":"10.70252/XEPS8890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The intensity of aerobic exercise is influenced by maximum heart rate (MHR), which can be assessed through an incremental exercise test. However, this method requires specialized equipment and a level of fitness that individuals who are sedentary or overweight may lack. Therefore, estimating MHR using formulas is essential. Various methods exist to calculate MHR, but their effectiveness in real exercise programs for obese individuals remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the effects of aerobic exercise using different intensity calculation methods, specifically comparing Fox's and Tanaka's maximum heart rate (MHR) equations, as well as the Percentage and Karvonen methods for target heart rate (THR). Seventy-eight men aged 20 to 30 with a body fat percentage of over 20% were divided into one control group and four aerobic exercise groups. EG1 and EG3 used Fox's and Tanaka's equations for MHR and THR from the percentage, while EG2 and EG4 applied the Karvonen method for THR. Participants engaged in 45 minutes of moderate-intensity walking or running on a treadmill four days a week for 12 weeks. Body weight, body fat percentage, BMI, resting heart rate (RHR), and VO<sub>2</sub> max were measured at baseline and after the intervention. After 12 weeks, all exercise groups demonstrated significant improvements in VO<sub>2</sub> max, as well as reductions in body weight, body fat percentage, BMI, and resting heart rate (RHR), whereas the control group showed no changes. No significant differences were found among the exercise groups. Aerobic exercise at various intensities effectively enhances cardiovascular fitness and body composition in obese individuals, indicating that these methods are equally beneficial.</p>","PeriodicalId":14171,"journal":{"name":"International journal of exercise science","volume":"18 8","pages":"695-711"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12408077/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of exercise science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.70252/XEPS8890","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The intensity of aerobic exercise is influenced by maximum heart rate (MHR), which can be assessed through an incremental exercise test. However, this method requires specialized equipment and a level of fitness that individuals who are sedentary or overweight may lack. Therefore, estimating MHR using formulas is essential. Various methods exist to calculate MHR, but their effectiveness in real exercise programs for obese individuals remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the effects of aerobic exercise using different intensity calculation methods, specifically comparing Fox's and Tanaka's maximum heart rate (MHR) equations, as well as the Percentage and Karvonen methods for target heart rate (THR). Seventy-eight men aged 20 to 30 with a body fat percentage of over 20% were divided into one control group and four aerobic exercise groups. EG1 and EG3 used Fox's and Tanaka's equations for MHR and THR from the percentage, while EG2 and EG4 applied the Karvonen method for THR. Participants engaged in 45 minutes of moderate-intensity walking or running on a treadmill four days a week for 12 weeks. Body weight, body fat percentage, BMI, resting heart rate (RHR), and VO2 max were measured at baseline and after the intervention. After 12 weeks, all exercise groups demonstrated significant improvements in VO2 max, as well as reductions in body weight, body fat percentage, BMI, and resting heart rate (RHR), whereas the control group showed no changes. No significant differences were found among the exercise groups. Aerobic exercise at various intensities effectively enhances cardiovascular fitness and body composition in obese individuals, indicating that these methods are equally beneficial.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

用Fox vs. Tanaka最大心率和百分比vs. Karvonen方法研究有氧运动对肥胖者身体健康的影响。
有氧运动的强度受最大心率(MHR)的影响,这可以通过增量运动试验来评估。然而,这种方法需要专门的设备和一定的健康水平,这是久坐或超重的人可能缺乏的。因此,使用公式估算MHR是必要的。计算MHR的方法多种多样,但它们在实际锻炼计划中对肥胖者的有效性尚不清楚。本研究旨在通过不同的强度计算方法来研究有氧运动的影响,特别是比较Fox和Tanaka的最大心率(MHR)方程,以及Percentage和Karvonen的目标心率(THR)方法。78名体脂率超过20%的20至30岁男性被分为一个对照组和四个有氧运动组。EG1和EG3采用Fox和Tanaka的MHR和THR公式计算百分比,而EG2和EG4采用Karvonen方法计算THR。参与者每周四天在跑步机上进行45分钟中等强度的步行或跑步,持续12周。在基线和干预后测量体重、体脂率、BMI、静息心率(RHR)和最大摄氧量。12周后,所有运动组的最大摄氧量都有显著改善,体重、体脂率、BMI和静息心率(RHR)也有所下降,而对照组没有任何变化。在运动组之间没有发现显著差异。不同强度的有氧运动可以有效提高肥胖个体的心血管健康和身体成分,表明这些方法同样有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International journal of exercise science
International journal of exercise science Health Professions-Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信