In the Reign of Velocity: Ballistic Training Enhances Rapid Force Production in Chronically Strength-Trained Athletes.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 PHYSIOLOGY
Edoardo Lecce, Ruggero Romagnoli, Nicola A Maffiuletti, Giorgio Frinolli, Francesco Felici, Maria Francesca Piacentini, Ilenia Bazzucchi
{"title":"In the Reign of Velocity: Ballistic Training Enhances Rapid Force Production in Chronically Strength-Trained Athletes.","authors":"Edoardo Lecce, Ruggero Romagnoli, Nicola A Maffiuletti, Giorgio Frinolli, Francesco Felici, Maria Francesca Piacentini, Ilenia Bazzucchi","doi":"10.1123/ijspp.2025-0115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Rapid force production relies upon neuromuscular mechanisms differing from those underlying maximal strength. In chronically strength-trained individuals, specific adaptations in rapid force variables (RFVs)-both absolute and normalized to maximal force capacity-following resistance training with ballistic versus controlled contractions remain underexplored. Therefore, we examined whether improvements in maximal propulsive power (MaxPP) coincide with RFV responses, specifically, rate of force development (RFD) and impulse.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten elite athletes (female n = 5) underwent maximal-intended-velocity (MIV) training and were compared with 10 (female n = 5) elite athletes performing moderate-velocity (MOV) training lasting 4 weeks. One-maximum repetition (1RM), MaxPP, and RFVs (RFD and impulse) were assessed at baseline and following 4 weeks of training.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups exhibited significant increases in 1RM (MIV: +13.9 kg, P < .001; MOV: +14.4 kg, P < .001). Although absolute MaxPP, RFD, and impulse improved in both groups, only the MIV group showed significant enhancements when normalized to 1RM (MaxPP: +13 W %1RM-1, P = .002; RFD: +61% 1RM·s-1, P = .004; impulse: +5% 1RM·s, P = .01). In contrast, MOV training reduced normalized MaxPP (-3 W %1RM-1, P = .04) and RFD (-15% 1RM·s-1, P = .02), with no significant change in impulse. A positive association was observed between improvements in MaxPP and RFD (P < .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings recognize ballistic contractions as the primary driver of improvements in RFVs among chronically strength-trained individuals. The parallel increase in MaxPP and RFD underscores the intrinsic relationship between the physiological capacity for rapid force generation and the resultant contraction speed, with the velocity demands placed on the neuromuscular system during resistance training governing these adaptations.</p>","PeriodicalId":14295,"journal":{"name":"International journal of sports physiology and performance","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of sports physiology and performance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2025-0115","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Rapid force production relies upon neuromuscular mechanisms differing from those underlying maximal strength. In chronically strength-trained individuals, specific adaptations in rapid force variables (RFVs)-both absolute and normalized to maximal force capacity-following resistance training with ballistic versus controlled contractions remain underexplored. Therefore, we examined whether improvements in maximal propulsive power (MaxPP) coincide with RFV responses, specifically, rate of force development (RFD) and impulse.

Methods: Ten elite athletes (female n = 5) underwent maximal-intended-velocity (MIV) training and were compared with 10 (female n = 5) elite athletes performing moderate-velocity (MOV) training lasting 4 weeks. One-maximum repetition (1RM), MaxPP, and RFVs (RFD and impulse) were assessed at baseline and following 4 weeks of training.

Results: Both groups exhibited significant increases in 1RM (MIV: +13.9 kg, P < .001; MOV: +14.4 kg, P < .001). Although absolute MaxPP, RFD, and impulse improved in both groups, only the MIV group showed significant enhancements when normalized to 1RM (MaxPP: +13 W %1RM-1, P = .002; RFD: +61% 1RM·s-1, P = .004; impulse: +5% 1RM·s, P = .01). In contrast, MOV training reduced normalized MaxPP (-3 W %1RM-1, P = .04) and RFD (-15% 1RM·s-1, P = .02), with no significant change in impulse. A positive association was observed between improvements in MaxPP and RFD (P < .01).

Conclusions: These findings recognize ballistic contractions as the primary driver of improvements in RFVs among chronically strength-trained individuals. The parallel increase in MaxPP and RFD underscores the intrinsic relationship between the physiological capacity for rapid force generation and the resultant contraction speed, with the velocity demands placed on the neuromuscular system during resistance training governing these adaptations.

在速度的统治下:弹道训练提高长期力量训练运动员的快速发力。
目的:快速的力量产生依赖于不同于潜在的最大力量的神经肌肉机制。在长期力量训练的个体中,快速力量变量(rfv)的特定适应-绝对和标准化到最大力量-在弹道与控制收缩的阻力训练之后仍然没有得到充分的研究。因此,我们研究了最大推进功率(MaxPP)的提高是否与RFV响应一致,特别是力发展率(RFD)和冲量。方法:10名优秀运动员(女n = 5)进行最大预期速度(MIV)训练,与10名优秀运动员(女n = 5)进行为期4周的中速(MOV)训练进行比较。在基线和训练4周后评估一次最大重复(1RM)、MaxPP和rfv (RFD和冲量)。结果:两组1RM均显著升高(MIV: +13.9 kg, P < 0.001; MOV: +14.4 kg, P < 0.001)。虽然两组的绝对MaxPP、RFD和冲量均有改善,但只有MIV组在归一化到1RM时有显著增强(MaxPP: +13 W %1RM-1, P = 0.002; RFD: +61% 1RM·s-1, P = 0.004;冲量:+5% 1RM·s, P = 0.01)。相比之下,MOV训练降低了归一化MaxPP (-3 W %1RM-1, P = .04)和RFD (-15% 1RM·s-1, P = .02),但冲量没有显著变化。MaxPP的改善与RFD呈正相关(P < 0.01)。结论:这些发现承认弹道收缩是长期力量训练个体中rfv改善的主要驱动因素。MaxPP和RFD的平行增加强调了快速产生力量的生理能力与由此产生的收缩速度之间的内在关系,而在阻力训练中对神经肌肉系统的速度要求控制了这些适应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
199
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance (IJSPP) focuses on sport physiology and performance and is dedicated to advancing the knowledge of sport and exercise physiologists, sport-performance researchers, and other sport scientists. The journal publishes authoritative peer-reviewed research in sport physiology and related disciplines, with an emphasis on work having direct practical applications in enhancing sport performance in sport physiology and related disciplines. IJSPP publishes 10 issues per year: January, February, March, April, May, July, August, September, October, and November.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信