Barriers and Facilitators for Translating Skills into Clinical Practice in Primary Psychiatry Care: Primary Care Doctors' Survey Through the Lens of Implementation Research.

IF 2 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Hetashri Shah, Ranjitha Ramachandraiah, Chandana Sabbella, Sourabh Joshi, Prakyath Ravindranath Hegde, Rahul Patley, Sivakami Sundari S, Jagadisha Thirthalli, Narayana Manjunatha, Channaveerachari Naveen Kumar, Suresh Bada Math
{"title":"Barriers and Facilitators for Translating Skills into Clinical Practice in Primary Psychiatry Care: Primary Care Doctors' Survey Through the Lens of Implementation Research.","authors":"Hetashri Shah, Ranjitha Ramachandraiah, Chandana Sabbella, Sourabh Joshi, Prakyath Ravindranath Hegde, Rahul Patley, Sivakami Sundari S, Jagadisha Thirthalli, Narayana Manjunatha, Channaveerachari Naveen Kumar, Suresh Bada Math","doi":"10.1177/02537176251369080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Though integrating psychiatric care into primary care is thought to be a pivotal step, a huge gap remains in translating this training into clinical practice at primary health centers (PHCs) in India. To address this, we aim to explore the perspectives of the primary care doctors (PCDs) from an implementation research angle.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous online survey with a semi-structured questionnaire gathered PCDs' perspectives on integrating primary care psychiatry training into India's healthcare system, focusing on Acceptability, Adoption, Appropriateness, and Feasibility subsets based on the conceptual framework for implementation outcomes. The survey reached 7,200 PCDs via a pan-India mental health capacity-building program, with 124 PCDs from 5 states participating. A 134 PCDs completed the Fidelity questionnaire. PCDs were grouped by mental health training status for comparative analysis. A mixed-method analysis was conducted on the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, PCDs reported high ratings across the subsets of Acceptability (91.1%-91.9%), Feasibility (75.8%-91.9%), Adoption (87.9%-93.5%), and Appropriateness (89.5%-92.7%). Clinical practice outcomes in terms of Fidelity (33.6%-52.2%) remained limited. Mental health training was significantly linked to increased comfort in managing mental health issues at PHCs (Acceptability subset, χ² = 4.79, <i>p</i> = .02), a greater readiness to start screening for mental health disorders (Adoption subset, χ² = 4.73 <i>p</i> = .03) and increased prescription practice at PHC for mental health disorders (Fidelity subset, χ² = 4.01, <i>p</i> = .04). Qualitative data analysis identified barriers such as stigma, time constraints, limited access to medications, staff shortages, and inadequate follow-up systems that hindered effective integration of mental health care at PHCs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Though psychiatry training of PCDs improves resource availability, addressing systemic challenges is essential for ensuring effective mental health service delivery at the primary care level.</p>","PeriodicalId":13476,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"02537176251369080"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12405208/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02537176251369080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Though integrating psychiatric care into primary care is thought to be a pivotal step, a huge gap remains in translating this training into clinical practice at primary health centers (PHCs) in India. To address this, we aim to explore the perspectives of the primary care doctors (PCDs) from an implementation research angle.

Methods: An anonymous online survey with a semi-structured questionnaire gathered PCDs' perspectives on integrating primary care psychiatry training into India's healthcare system, focusing on Acceptability, Adoption, Appropriateness, and Feasibility subsets based on the conceptual framework for implementation outcomes. The survey reached 7,200 PCDs via a pan-India mental health capacity-building program, with 124 PCDs from 5 states participating. A 134 PCDs completed the Fidelity questionnaire. PCDs were grouped by mental health training status for comparative analysis. A mixed-method analysis was conducted on the data.

Results: Overall, PCDs reported high ratings across the subsets of Acceptability (91.1%-91.9%), Feasibility (75.8%-91.9%), Adoption (87.9%-93.5%), and Appropriateness (89.5%-92.7%). Clinical practice outcomes in terms of Fidelity (33.6%-52.2%) remained limited. Mental health training was significantly linked to increased comfort in managing mental health issues at PHCs (Acceptability subset, χ² = 4.79, p = .02), a greater readiness to start screening for mental health disorders (Adoption subset, χ² = 4.73 p = .03) and increased prescription practice at PHC for mental health disorders (Fidelity subset, χ² = 4.01, p = .04). Qualitative data analysis identified barriers such as stigma, time constraints, limited access to medications, staff shortages, and inadequate follow-up systems that hindered effective integration of mental health care at PHCs.

Conclusions: Though psychiatry training of PCDs improves resource availability, addressing systemic challenges is essential for ensuring effective mental health service delivery at the primary care level.

初级精神病学护理技能转化为临床实践的障碍与促进因素:基于实施研究视角的初级保健医生调查。
背景:虽然将精神病学护理纳入初级保健被认为是关键的一步,但在将这种培训转化为印度初级卫生中心(PHCs)的临床实践方面仍存在巨大差距。为了解决这个问题,我们旨在从实施研究的角度探讨初级保健医生(PCDs)的观点。方法:一项匿名在线调查和半结构化问卷收集了PCDs对将初级保健精神病学培训纳入印度卫生保健系统的观点,重点关注基于实施结果概念框架的可接受性、采用性、适当性和可行性子集。通过一项泛印度精神卫生能力建设方案,共有来自5个邦的124名精神病患者参与了这项调查,覆盖了7 200名精神病患者。有134名pc完成了富达度问卷。按心理健康训练状况分组进行比较分析。采用混合方法对数据进行分析。结果:总体而言,PCDs在可接受性(91.1%-91.9%)、可行性(75.8%-91.9%)、采用率(87.9%-93.5%)和适当性(89.5%-92.7%)的子集中报告了较高的评分。临床实践结果的保真度(33.6%-52.2%)仍然有限。心理健康培训与初级保健医院管理心理健康问题的舒适度增加(可接受性子集,χ²= 4.79,p = 0.02)、更愿意开始筛查心理健康障碍(采用子集,χ²= 4.73 p = 0.03)以及初级保健医院心理健康障碍的处方实践增加(忠诚子集,χ²= 4.01,p = 0.04)显著相关。定性数据分析确定了阻碍初级保健中心有效整合精神卫生保健的障碍,如耻辱、时间限制、获得药物的机会有限、人员短缺和随访系统不足。结论:虽然对慢性阻塞性精神疾病患者进行精神病学培训可以提高资源的可用性,但解决系统性挑战对于确保在初级保健层面有效提供精神卫生服务至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
116
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine (ISSN 0253-7176) was started in 1978 as the official publication of the Indian Psychiatric Society South Zonal Branch. The journal allows free access (Open Access) and is published Bimonthly. The Journal includes but is not limited to review articles, original research, opinions, and letters. The Editor and publisher accept no legal responsibility for any opinions, omissions or errors by the authors, nor do they approve of any product advertised within the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信