Can machines see cancer? A systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis of machine learning in retinoblastoma and leukocoria detection.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Paweł Marek Łajczak, Przemysław Nowakowski, Kamil Jóźwik, Krzysztof Żerdziński, Julita Janiec
{"title":"Can machines see cancer? A systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis of machine learning in retinoblastoma and leukocoria detection.","authors":"Paweł Marek Łajczak, Przemysław Nowakowski, Kamil Jóźwik, Krzysztof Żerdziński, Julita Janiec","doi":"10.1177/11206721251375239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a growing interest in the use of machine learning (ML) for the diagnosis of retinoblastoma and leukocoria, and this study aims to systematically evaluate its performance compared with reference standards. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. We included studies using ML to diagnose retinoblastoma or leukocoria and providing enough data for analysis of diagnostic accuracy. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, and other measures of diagnostic performance. Twelve studies were included. Pooled sensitivity for retinoblastoma and leukocoria detection was 0.972 with ML models, indicating high potential for screening. However, high heterogeneity in the analyses was observed. The review also noted biases in some studies, along with small sample sizes that would limit generalizability. ML models appear to be promising for retinoblastoma diagnosis; however, limitations in specificity and potential methodological bias need further investigation. Incorporating research that used photographs taken with smartphone cameras indicates that ML-based diagnosis may become even more widely available through the use of such technology. Future studies need to have better specificity of the model, less bias in the methodology, must be conducted on large-scale datasets and they should address the cost-effective analysis compared with traditional methods. The incorporation of ML into the practice of retinoblastoma diagnosis has the capacity to transform the mode of detecting this condition and ultimately enhance patient management.</p>","PeriodicalId":12000,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"11206721251375239"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721251375239","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a growing interest in the use of machine learning (ML) for the diagnosis of retinoblastoma and leukocoria, and this study aims to systematically evaluate its performance compared with reference standards. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. We included studies using ML to diagnose retinoblastoma or leukocoria and providing enough data for analysis of diagnostic accuracy. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, and other measures of diagnostic performance. Twelve studies were included. Pooled sensitivity for retinoblastoma and leukocoria detection was 0.972 with ML models, indicating high potential for screening. However, high heterogeneity in the analyses was observed. The review also noted biases in some studies, along with small sample sizes that would limit generalizability. ML models appear to be promising for retinoblastoma diagnosis; however, limitations in specificity and potential methodological bias need further investigation. Incorporating research that used photographs taken with smartphone cameras indicates that ML-based diagnosis may become even more widely available through the use of such technology. Future studies need to have better specificity of the model, less bias in the methodology, must be conducted on large-scale datasets and they should address the cost-effective analysis compared with traditional methods. The incorporation of ML into the practice of retinoblastoma diagnosis has the capacity to transform the mode of detecting this condition and ultimately enhance patient management.

机器能看到癌症吗?机器学习在视网膜母细胞瘤和白斑检测中的系统回顾和诊断荟萃分析。
人们对机器学习(ML)用于视网膜母细胞瘤和白斑的诊断越来越感兴趣,本研究旨在与参考标准比较系统地评估其性能。根据系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明进行系统评价和荟萃分析。我们纳入了使用ML诊断视网膜母细胞瘤或白斑的研究,并提供了足够的数据来分析诊断的准确性。我们计算了敏感性、特异性和其他诊断性能指标。纳入了12项研究。ML模型对视网膜母细胞瘤和白细胞检测的总敏感性为0.972,具有较高的筛选潜力。然而,在分析中观察到高度异质性。该综述还指出了一些研究中的偏差,以及样本量小,这将限制推广。ML模型对视网膜母细胞瘤的诊断似乎很有希望;然而,特异性的局限性和潜在的方法学偏差需要进一步调查。结合使用智能手机相机拍摄的照片的研究表明,通过使用这种技术,基于ml的诊断可能会得到更广泛的应用。未来的研究需要提高模型的特异性,减少方法上的偏差,必须在大规模的数据集上进行,并且要解决与传统方法相比的成本效益分析问题。将ML纳入视网膜母细胞瘤诊断的实践中,有能力改变检测这种疾病的模式,并最终增强患者管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
372
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Ophthalmology was founded in 1991 and is issued in print bi-monthly. It publishes only peer-reviewed original research reporting clinical observations and laboratory investigations with clinical relevance focusing on new diagnostic and surgical techniques, instrument and therapy updates, results of clinical trials and research findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信