Felicia H Lew, Karl Cristie Figuracion, Shannon E Fogh, David P Sheppard, Yolanda D Tseng, Lia M Halasz, Jerome J Graber, Samuel Emerson, Simon S Lo, Sara J Hardy
{"title":"Importance of radiation-related cognitive decline in older adults who receive cranial radiation.","authors":"Felicia H Lew, Karl Cristie Figuracion, Shannon E Fogh, David P Sheppard, Yolanda D Tseng, Lia M Halasz, Jerome J Graber, Samuel Emerson, Simon S Lo, Sara J Hardy","doi":"10.1080/14737140.2025.2555472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Radiation-related cognitive decline (RRCD), characterized by a decline in cognitive functioning within domains, such as memory and executive function, is a known potential consequence of cranial radiation. Older adults are disproportionately vulnerable to cognitive side effects of radiation (RT), and there can be significant impacts on quality of life and independence. Various mechanisms underlying the development of RRCD have been proposed but have not been specifically evaluated in older adults.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>In this article, we review the studies that have evaluated cognitive effects of cranial radiation in older adults and discuss the mechanisms and factors that may lead to increased vulnerability of RRCD development in older adults.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The review of the literature is limited by the variety of cognitive outcome measurements used as well as different ages evaluated. However, most studies support increased vulnerability to RRCD in older adults. No studies include geriatric assessment or other measures of biological age. Potential interventions include redefining whether different dose constraints are warranted in the older adult population, evaluating new medication interventions and utilizing radiation techniques that treat smaller volumes. Further research is needed to determine whether there is a corresponding reduction in RRCD.</p>","PeriodicalId":12099,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2025.2555472","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Radiation-related cognitive decline (RRCD), characterized by a decline in cognitive functioning within domains, such as memory and executive function, is a known potential consequence of cranial radiation. Older adults are disproportionately vulnerable to cognitive side effects of radiation (RT), and there can be significant impacts on quality of life and independence. Various mechanisms underlying the development of RRCD have been proposed but have not been specifically evaluated in older adults.
Areas covered: In this article, we review the studies that have evaluated cognitive effects of cranial radiation in older adults and discuss the mechanisms and factors that may lead to increased vulnerability of RRCD development in older adults.
Expert opinion: The review of the literature is limited by the variety of cognitive outcome measurements used as well as different ages evaluated. However, most studies support increased vulnerability to RRCD in older adults. No studies include geriatric assessment or other measures of biological age. Potential interventions include redefining whether different dose constraints are warranted in the older adult population, evaluating new medication interventions and utilizing radiation techniques that treat smaller volumes. Further research is needed to determine whether there is a corresponding reduction in RRCD.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy (ISSN 1473-7140) provides expert appraisal and commentary on the major trends in cancer care and highlights the performance of new therapeutic and diagnostic approaches.
Coverage includes tumor management, novel medicines, anticancer agents and chemotherapy, biological therapy, cancer vaccines, therapeutic indications, biomarkers and diagnostics, and treatment guidelines. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review, and the journal makes an essential contribution to decision-making in cancer care.
Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Review format and includes the following sections:
Expert Opinion - a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results
Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.