The challenge of secondary cardiovascular prevention in very high Lipoprotein (a) level: a case report.

IF 0.8 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
European Heart Journal: Case Reports Pub Date : 2025-08-09 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1093/ehjcr/ytaf389
Andrea D'Amuri, Pietro Di Gangi, Mauro Pagani, Corrado Lettieri
{"title":"The challenge of secondary cardiovascular prevention in very high Lipoprotein (a) level: a case report.","authors":"Andrea D'Amuri, Pietro Di Gangi, Mauro Pagani, Corrado Lettieri","doi":"10.1093/ehjcr/ytaf389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While advances in technology and procedural techniques have significantly improved outcomes post-PCI, two pharmacological strategies have gained particular attention for their effectiveness in reducing long-term cardiovascular (CV) risk: anti-platelet therapies and lipid-lowering therapies (LLT). The 10-year recurrence risk for major CV events remains as high as 10-30%, due to various pathophysiological pathways collectively known as residual risk (RR), even with optimal CV risk factor management after acute coronary syndrome (ACS). RR includes factors such as elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], triglycerides, pro-thrombotic states, hyperglycemia, and persistent subclinical arterial inflammation.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This case highlights the challenge of managing a patient with multiple recurrent cardiac ischaemic events and in-stent restenosis, despite good medical therapy and no other significant CV risk factors except for markedly elevated Lp(a) levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Three critical aspects of daily practice emerge from our observation. First, Lp(a) is a valuable parameter for CV risk stratification in primary prevention. Second, measurement of Lp(a) post-CV event may provide valuable information on the risk of ischaemic recurrence, influencing decisions regarding long-term dual anti-platelet therapy (DAPT). Finally, this case illustrates the importance of a multidisciplinary approach in managing patients with very high cardiovascular risk. Close collaboration between cardiologists and lipidologists facilitated the identification of a rare lipid disorder and the decision to pursue lipoprotein apheresis, an intensive but effective treatment option for lipid metabolism disorders lacking conventional medical therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11910,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal: Case Reports","volume":"9 9","pages":"ytaf389"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12405756/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal: Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcr/ytaf389","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While advances in technology and procedural techniques have significantly improved outcomes post-PCI, two pharmacological strategies have gained particular attention for their effectiveness in reducing long-term cardiovascular (CV) risk: anti-platelet therapies and lipid-lowering therapies (LLT). The 10-year recurrence risk for major CV events remains as high as 10-30%, due to various pathophysiological pathways collectively known as residual risk (RR), even with optimal CV risk factor management after acute coronary syndrome (ACS). RR includes factors such as elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], triglycerides, pro-thrombotic states, hyperglycemia, and persistent subclinical arterial inflammation.

Aims: This case highlights the challenge of managing a patient with multiple recurrent cardiac ischaemic events and in-stent restenosis, despite good medical therapy and no other significant CV risk factors except for markedly elevated Lp(a) levels.

Conclusion: Three critical aspects of daily practice emerge from our observation. First, Lp(a) is a valuable parameter for CV risk stratification in primary prevention. Second, measurement of Lp(a) post-CV event may provide valuable information on the risk of ischaemic recurrence, influencing decisions regarding long-term dual anti-platelet therapy (DAPT). Finally, this case illustrates the importance of a multidisciplinary approach in managing patients with very high cardiovascular risk. Close collaboration between cardiologists and lipidologists facilitated the identification of a rare lipid disorder and the decision to pursue lipoprotein apheresis, an intensive but effective treatment option for lipid metabolism disorders lacking conventional medical therapy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

极高脂蛋白(a)水平对心血管二级预防的挑战:1例报告。
背景:虽然技术和手术技术的进步显著改善了pci术后的预后,但两种药物策略因其降低长期心血管(CV)风险的有效性而受到特别关注:抗血小板治疗和降脂治疗(LLT)。即使在急性冠脉综合征(ACS)后采用最佳的心血管危险因素管理,由于各种病理生理途径统称为残余风险(RR),主要心血管事件的10年复发风险仍高达10-30%。RR包括脂蛋白(a)升高[Lp(a)]、甘油三酯、促血栓状态、高血糖和持续的亚临床动脉炎症等因素。目的:本病例强调了治疗多发性复发性心脏缺血事件和支架内再狭窄患者的挑战,尽管有良好的药物治疗,除了Lp(a)水平明显升高外,没有其他显著的心血管危险因素。结论:日常练习的三个关键方面从我们的观察中浮现出来。首先,Lp(a)是一级预防中心血管危险分层的一个有价值的参数。其次,测量cv后事件的Lp(a)可能提供关于缺血复发风险的有价值的信息,影响长期双重抗血小板治疗(DAPT)的决策。最后,这个病例说明了多学科方法在管理非常高心血管风险患者中的重要性。心脏病学家和脂质学家之间的密切合作促进了一种罕见的脂质紊乱的识别,并决定进行脂蛋白分离,这是一种针对缺乏常规药物治疗的脂质代谢紊乱的强化但有效的治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Heart Journal: Case Reports
European Heart Journal: Case Reports Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
451
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信