Clinical audit of pre-procedural checklists in an equine referral hospital.

IF 2.2 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Thomas J Beeston, Juliet C Duncan, Patrick J Pollock
{"title":"Clinical audit of pre-procedural checklists in an equine referral hospital.","authors":"Thomas J Beeston, Juliet C Duncan, Patrick J Pollock","doi":"10.1111/evj.70097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical safety checklists have demonstrated a positive impact on post-surgical morbidity/mortality in human medicine, and likely have an equal benefit in veterinary medicine. To realise their advantages, they must be correctly and regularly used. A clinical audit was planned to assess this.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the compliance with the pre-procedural request form/surgical safety checklist in a large multi-disciplinary equine referral hospital.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective full-cycle clinical audit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred and forty-eight checklists (consisting of 23 sub-sections) were examined for completeness. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and section completion rates were compared against national standards. Interventions to improve checklist use were made: a checklist redesign after consultation with end-users, a hospital education scheme to improve staff understanding, regular e-mail reminders, and recruitment of key senior staff as champions. Lastly, it was made policy for checklists to be uploaded to the horse's medical record. Following this, 30 new checklists were re-audited in the same manner. Results obtained were compared against the first audit and national standards.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Checklists were rarely fully complete. In the first audit, completion rates for various subsections ranged from 9% to 89%, with a median value of 64%. In the re-audit, the completion rates ranged from 80% to 100%, with a median value of 93%. The sign-out section was most likely to be incomplete.</p><p><strong>Main limitations: </strong>Data were not collected in real-time, and it is difficult to determine the significance of missing data. Staff were aware of the re-audit; it is possible that checklist compliance was temporarily increased. Fewer checklists were examined in the second audit.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The interventions have a positive benefit on checklist completion. A clinical audit of checklists is a useful tool that can easily be conducted in practice and may help promote a safety culture within hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":11796,"journal":{"name":"Equine Veterinary Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Equine Veterinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.70097","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Surgical safety checklists have demonstrated a positive impact on post-surgical morbidity/mortality in human medicine, and likely have an equal benefit in veterinary medicine. To realise their advantages, they must be correctly and regularly used. A clinical audit was planned to assess this.

Objectives: To determine the compliance with the pre-procedural request form/surgical safety checklist in a large multi-disciplinary equine referral hospital.

Study design: Retrospective full-cycle clinical audit.

Methods: One hundred and forty-eight checklists (consisting of 23 sub-sections) were examined for completeness. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and section completion rates were compared against national standards. Interventions to improve checklist use were made: a checklist redesign after consultation with end-users, a hospital education scheme to improve staff understanding, regular e-mail reminders, and recruitment of key senior staff as champions. Lastly, it was made policy for checklists to be uploaded to the horse's medical record. Following this, 30 new checklists were re-audited in the same manner. Results obtained were compared against the first audit and national standards.

Results: Checklists were rarely fully complete. In the first audit, completion rates for various subsections ranged from 9% to 89%, with a median value of 64%. In the re-audit, the completion rates ranged from 80% to 100%, with a median value of 93%. The sign-out section was most likely to be incomplete.

Main limitations: Data were not collected in real-time, and it is difficult to determine the significance of missing data. Staff were aware of the re-audit; it is possible that checklist compliance was temporarily increased. Fewer checklists were examined in the second audit.

Conclusions: The interventions have a positive benefit on checklist completion. A clinical audit of checklists is a useful tool that can easily be conducted in practice and may help promote a safety culture within hospitals.

某马科转诊医院手术前检查表的临床审核。
背景:在人类医学中,手术安全清单已被证明对术后发病率/死亡率有积极影响,在兽医学中可能也有同样的好处。为了实现它们的优势,必须正确和有规律地使用它们。计划进行临床审核以评估这一点。目的:了解某大型多学科马科转诊医院对术前请求表/手术安全检查表的遵守情况。研究设计:回顾性全周期临床审计。方法:对148份检查表(包括23个小节)进行完整性检查。进行描述性统计,并将剖面图完成率与国家标准进行比较。采取了改善清单使用的干预措施:在与最终用户协商后重新设计清单,制定医院教育计划以提高工作人员的理解,定期发送电子邮件提醒,并招聘关键的高级工作人员作为倡导者。最后,制定了将检查清单上传到马的医疗记录上的政策。在此之后,以同样的方式重新审计了30份新的核对表。所得结果与第一次审计和国家标准进行了比较。结果:检查表很少完全完成。在第一次审计中,各个小节的完成率从9%到89%不等,中位数为64%。在复核中,完成率从80%到100%不等,中位数为93%。签到部分很可能是不完整的。主要局限性:数据采集不是实时的,缺失数据的意义难以确定。工作人员知道重新审计;有可能检查表的遵从性暂时增加了。第二次审计审查的核对表较少。结论:干预对检查表的完成有积极的作用。对检查清单进行临床审核是一种有用的工具,可以在实践中轻松进行,并有助于在医院内促进安全文化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Equine Veterinary Journal
Equine Veterinary Journal 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
13.60%
发文量
161
审稿时长
6-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Equine Veterinary Journal publishes evidence to improve clinical practice or expand scientific knowledge underpinning equine veterinary medicine. This unrivalled international scientific journal is published 6 times per year, containing peer-reviewed articles with original and potentially important findings. Contributions are received from sources worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信