Serum albumin demonstrates comparable or superior prognostic value compared to albumin-based ratios in sepsis.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Gianni Turcato, Arian Zaboli, Alessandro Cipriano, Gloria Brigiari, Paolo Ferretto, Fabrizio Lucente, Lucia Filippi, Michael Maggi, Massimo Marchetti, Lorenzo Ghiadoni, Christian J Wiedermann
{"title":"Serum albumin demonstrates comparable or superior prognostic value compared to albumin-based ratios in sepsis.","authors":"Gianni Turcato, Arian Zaboli, Alessandro Cipriano, Gloria Brigiari, Paolo Ferretto, Fabrizio Lucente, Lucia Filippi, Michael Maggi, Massimo Marchetti, Lorenzo Ghiadoni, Christian J Wiedermann","doi":"10.1080/03007995.2025.2558128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Serum albumin is a well-known biomarker in sepsis, and several albumin-based ratios have been proposed to enhance its prognostic performance. However, it remains unclear whether these composite indices outperform serum albumin alone in predicting outcomes in septic patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective observational study including 413 adult patients with sepsis admitted to the Intermediate Care Unit of Santorso Hospital, Italy, between January 2023 and June 2024. Clinical data, laboratory parameters, and six albumin-based ratios were collected at admission. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Prognostic performance was assessed using ROC curves, Brier Scores, and Decision Curve Analysis (DCA). Correlation with clinical severity was evaluated using Spearman's correlation with SOFA and APACHE II scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 413 patients enrolled, 30-day mortality was 16.9%. Serum albumin demonstrated the highest predictive value compared to all albumin-based ratios. DCA confirmed the superior net clinical benefit of serum albumin across a wide range of threshold probabilities, especially in early risk stratification. LAR showed comparable performance in AUC but lower clinical utility in DCA. Albumin also showed the strongest inverse correlation with SOFA (ρ = -0.276, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and APACHE II (ρ = -0.391, <i>p</i> < 0.001) scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Serum albumin is a strong, independent predictor of 30-day mortality in patients with sepsis and outperforms multiple albumin-based ratios in both statistical and clinical utility. Its use in early risk stratification should be encouraged in clinical practice. Further multicenter studies are warranted to confirm these findings and explore their generalizability.</p>","PeriodicalId":10814,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2025.2558128","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Serum albumin is a well-known biomarker in sepsis, and several albumin-based ratios have been proposed to enhance its prognostic performance. However, it remains unclear whether these composite indices outperform serum albumin alone in predicting outcomes in septic patients.

Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study including 413 adult patients with sepsis admitted to the Intermediate Care Unit of Santorso Hospital, Italy, between January 2023 and June 2024. Clinical data, laboratory parameters, and six albumin-based ratios were collected at admission. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Prognostic performance was assessed using ROC curves, Brier Scores, and Decision Curve Analysis (DCA). Correlation with clinical severity was evaluated using Spearman's correlation with SOFA and APACHE II scores.

Results: Among the 413 patients enrolled, 30-day mortality was 16.9%. Serum albumin demonstrated the highest predictive value compared to all albumin-based ratios. DCA confirmed the superior net clinical benefit of serum albumin across a wide range of threshold probabilities, especially in early risk stratification. LAR showed comparable performance in AUC but lower clinical utility in DCA. Albumin also showed the strongest inverse correlation with SOFA (ρ = -0.276, p < 0.001) and APACHE II (ρ = -0.391, p < 0.001) scores.

Conclusions: Serum albumin is a strong, independent predictor of 30-day mortality in patients with sepsis and outperforms multiple albumin-based ratios in both statistical and clinical utility. Its use in early risk stratification should be encouraged in clinical practice. Further multicenter studies are warranted to confirm these findings and explore their generalizability.

在脓毒症中,血清白蛋白与以白蛋白为基础的比率相比具有相当或更好的预后价值。
背景:血清白蛋白是一种众所周知的脓毒症生物标志物,已经提出了几种基于白蛋白的比率来提高其预后表现。然而,目前尚不清楚这些综合指标在预测脓毒症患者预后方面是否优于单独的血清白蛋白。方法:我们进行了一项前瞻性观察研究,包括413名在2023年1月至2024年6月期间入住意大利Santorso医院中级护理病房的脓毒症成年患者。入院时收集临床资料、实验室参数和6个白蛋白基础比率。主要终点为30天死亡率。采用ROC曲线、Brier评分和决策曲线分析(DCA)评估预后。使用Spearman与SOFA和APACHE II评分的相关性来评估与临床严重程度的相关性。结果:纳入的413例患者中,30天死亡率为16.9%。与所有基于白蛋白的比率相比,血清白蛋白显示出最高的预测价值。DCA证实了血清白蛋白在广泛的阈值概率范围内具有优越的净临床益处,特别是在早期风险分层中。LAR在AUC中表现相当,但在DCA中的临床应用较低。白蛋白也与SOFA (ρ = -0.276, p < 0.001)和APACHE II (ρ = -0.391, p < 0.001)评分呈最强负相关。结论:血清白蛋白是脓毒症患者30天死亡率的一个强有力的独立预测指标,在统计和临床应用方面都优于多种基于白蛋白的比率。在临床实践中应鼓励将其用于早期风险分层。需要进一步的多中心研究来证实这些发现并探索其普遍性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Medical Research and Opinion
Current Medical Research and Opinion 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
247
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Medical Research and Opinion is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal for the rapid publication of original research on new and existing drugs and therapies, Phase II-IV studies, and post-marketing investigations. Equivalence, safety and efficacy/effectiveness studies are especially encouraged. Preclinical, Phase I, pharmacoeconomic, outcomes and quality of life studies may also be considered if there is clear clinical relevance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信