Evaluation of Tensile Strength of Hand Sewn Anastomoses after Gastric Resections - An Experimental Ex Vivo Study.

IF 0.8 Q4 SURGERY
Chirurgia Pub Date : 2025-08-01 DOI:10.21614/chirurgia.3138
Nicolae Suciu, Orsolya Bauer, Călin Crăciun, Rareş Georgescu, Sorin Sorlea, Flavius Mocian, Orsolya Katona, Marius Florin Coros
{"title":"Evaluation of Tensile Strength of Hand Sewn Anastomoses after Gastric Resections - An Experimental Ex Vivo Study.","authors":"Nicolae Suciu, Orsolya Bauer, Călin Crăciun, Rareş Georgescu, Sorin Sorlea, Flavius Mocian, Orsolya Katona, Marius Florin Coros","doi":"10.21614/chirurgia.3138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> This study aimed to evaluate the resistance of anastomoses to mechanical traction in an ex vivo biomechanical experiment, to determine the most resistant manual suture for restoring digestive tract continuity after various types of gastric resection for cancer. Materials and methods: The tensile strength of different types of anastomoses was compared ex vivo using porcine esophagus, stomach, and small intestine. The test setup included a tensile testing device, which applied a controlled force on the anastomoses until they broke, which was recorded for each type of anastomosis and was expressed in N. Data processing and statistical analysis were performed in the GraphPad Prism program, using a paired T-test and ANOVA test. We considered the p-value 0.05 to be statistically significant. <b>Results:</b> Double-layer gastrojejunal (Roux-en-Y) and end-to-end esophagojejunal anastomosis presented the highest tensile strength. Double-layer anastomoses showed significantly higher tensile strength compared to monoplane ones. The results suggest that the double-layer suture technique offers better mechanical stability, which may reduce the risk of postoperative complications. <b>Conclusions:</b> Biplane anastomoses after gastric resections may reduce postoperative complications and improve patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10171,"journal":{"name":"Chirurgia","volume":"120 4","pages":"432-437"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chirurgia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21614/chirurgia.3138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the resistance of anastomoses to mechanical traction in an ex vivo biomechanical experiment, to determine the most resistant manual suture for restoring digestive tract continuity after various types of gastric resection for cancer. Materials and methods: The tensile strength of different types of anastomoses was compared ex vivo using porcine esophagus, stomach, and small intestine. The test setup included a tensile testing device, which applied a controlled force on the anastomoses until they broke, which was recorded for each type of anastomosis and was expressed in N. Data processing and statistical analysis were performed in the GraphPad Prism program, using a paired T-test and ANOVA test. We considered the p-value 0.05 to be statistically significant. Results: Double-layer gastrojejunal (Roux-en-Y) and end-to-end esophagojejunal anastomosis presented the highest tensile strength. Double-layer anastomoses showed significantly higher tensile strength compared to monoplane ones. The results suggest that the double-layer suture technique offers better mechanical stability, which may reduce the risk of postoperative complications. Conclusions: Biplane anastomoses after gastric resections may reduce postoperative complications and improve patient outcomes.

胃切除术后手缝吻合器的抗拉强度评价-离体实验研究。
前言:本研究旨在通过离体生物力学实验评估吻合口对机械牵引的阻力,以确定在各种类型胃癌切除术后恢复消化道连续性的最耐药手工缝合方式。材料与方法:采用猪食管、胃、小肠对不同类型吻合口进行体外抗拉强度比较。试验设置包括拉力测试装置,该装置对吻合口施加可控的力,直到吻合口断裂,记录每种吻合口的受力情况,并以n表示。数据处理和统计分析在GraphPad Prism程序中进行,采用配对t检验和方差分析检验。我们认为p值0.05具有统计学意义。结果:双层胃空肠(Roux-en-Y)吻合术和端对端食管空肠吻合术的抗张强度最高。双层吻合器的抗拉强度明显高于单层吻合器。结果表明,双层缝合技术具有较好的机械稳定性,可降低术后并发症的发生风险。结论:胃切除术后采用双平面吻合术可减少术后并发症,改善患者预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chirurgia
Chirurgia Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Chirurgia is a bimonthly journal. In Chirurgia, original papers in the area of general surgery which neither appeared, nor were sent for publication in other periodicals, can be published. You can send original articles, new surgical techniques, or comprehensive general reports on surgical topics, clinical case presentations and, depending on publication space, - reviews of some articles of general interest to surgeons from other publications. Chirurgia is also a place for sharing information about the activity of various branches of the Romanian Society of Surgery, information on Congresses and Symposiums organized by the Romanian Society of Surgery and participation notes in other scientific meetings. Letters to the editor: Letters commenting on papers published in Chirurgia are welcomed. They should contain substantive ideas and commentaries supported by appropriate data, and should not exceed 2 pages. Please submit these letters to the editor through our online system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信