Yash Akkara, Param Thakrar, Mahathir Ahmed, Oluchi Akosa, Amit Saroa, Joe M Das, Nigel Mendoza
{"title":"Incidence, role, and imaging-based diagnostic accuracy of neurovascular compression in trigeminal neuralgia: a longitudinal cohort study.","authors":"Yash Akkara, Param Thakrar, Mahathir Ahmed, Oluchi Akosa, Amit Saroa, Joe M Das, Nigel Mendoza","doi":"10.1080/02688697.2025.2538484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Neurovascular compression (NVC) often drives trigeminal neuralgia (TGN) pathology. This study examines the incidence, diagnostic accuracy, and role of NVC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review of patients ≥18 years with medically refractory TGN who underwent MRI, plus a secondary cohort of medically responsive patients. All had ≥1-year follow-up. MRI scans were interpreted by a general radiologist (initial) and neuroradiologist (final), with the latter used to determine NVC. Patients were grouped as: no NVC (NC), NVC on symptomatic side (SC), and bilateral NVC (BC). Statistical tests included Shapiro-Wilk, paired T-test, ANOVA, and Log-Rank; The Barrow-Neurological Institute (BNI) scale quantified severity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 459 patients, 168, 213, and 78 had NC, SC, and BC respectively. Interpretation congruence on the symptomatic side was significantly different (p < 0.01). BC patients had lower median BNI at diagnosis (BNI = 3, p = 0.0018) and more frequent sensory deficits (50%, p = 0.0006). KM analysis showed significant differences in median recurrence: NC (7.1 months), SC (9.0 months), BC (10.0 months), AC (15.8 months). SC patients were less likely to have refractory TGN (OR = 0.6622, p = 0.0064), while NC patients were more likely (OR =1.469, p = 0.0091).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings reveal interpretation errors and suggest increased blinding. NC patients had more refractory TGN; BC patients had reduced severity.</p>","PeriodicalId":9261,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02688697.2025.2538484","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Neurovascular compression (NVC) often drives trigeminal neuralgia (TGN) pathology. This study examines the incidence, diagnostic accuracy, and role of NVC.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients ≥18 years with medically refractory TGN who underwent MRI, plus a secondary cohort of medically responsive patients. All had ≥1-year follow-up. MRI scans were interpreted by a general radiologist (initial) and neuroradiologist (final), with the latter used to determine NVC. Patients were grouped as: no NVC (NC), NVC on symptomatic side (SC), and bilateral NVC (BC). Statistical tests included Shapiro-Wilk, paired T-test, ANOVA, and Log-Rank; The Barrow-Neurological Institute (BNI) scale quantified severity.
Results: Among 459 patients, 168, 213, and 78 had NC, SC, and BC respectively. Interpretation congruence on the symptomatic side was significantly different (p < 0.01). BC patients had lower median BNI at diagnosis (BNI = 3, p = 0.0018) and more frequent sensory deficits (50%, p = 0.0006). KM analysis showed significant differences in median recurrence: NC (7.1 months), SC (9.0 months), BC (10.0 months), AC (15.8 months). SC patients were less likely to have refractory TGN (OR = 0.6622, p = 0.0064), while NC patients were more likely (OR =1.469, p = 0.0091).
Conclusion: Findings reveal interpretation errors and suggest increased blinding. NC patients had more refractory TGN; BC patients had reduced severity.
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of Neurosurgery is a leading international forum for debate in the field of neurosurgery, publishing original peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality, along with comment and correspondence on all topics of current interest to neurosurgeons worldwide.
Coverage includes all aspects of case assessment and surgical practice, as well as wide-ranging research, with an emphasis on clinical rather than experimental material. Special emphasis is placed on postgraduate education with review articles on basic neurosciences and on the theory behind advances in techniques, investigation and clinical management. All papers are submitted to rigorous and independent peer-review, ensuring the journal’s wide citation and its appearance in the major abstracting and indexing services.