Attitudes of psychiatric staff toward coercion: nationwide AttCo study.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Klara Czernin, Anna Oster, Matthias Jaeger, Julia Junghanss, Josef S Baumgartner, Lieselotte Mahler
{"title":"Attitudes of psychiatric staff toward coercion: nationwide AttCo study.","authors":"Klara Czernin, Anna Oster, Matthias Jaeger, Julia Junghanss, Josef S Baumgartner, Lieselotte Mahler","doi":"10.1192/bjo.2025.10808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Attitudes of mental health professionals toward coercion are a potential tool in reducing the use of coercive measures in psychiatry.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study, part of the nationwide Attitudes toward Coercion (AttCo) project, aimed to assess staff attitudes on a nationwide and multiprofessional scale across adult, child and adolescent, and forensic psychiatric departments.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>During 9 weeks in 2023, 1702 psychiatric staff members across Germany filled out a survey including gender, age, profession, work experience and setting, and the validated Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale (SACS). Analyses of variance and multivariate regression analysis for SACS mean overall score were computed to assess group differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants largely supported that coercion could be reduced with more time and personal contact (mean 4.20, range 1-5), and that coercion can harm the therapeutic relationship (mean 4.08); however, they acknowledged that coercion sometimes needs to be used for security reasons (mean 4.10). Regarding group differences, specialisation (<i>P</i> < 0.001) and professional affiliation (<i>P</i> = 0.008) remained significantly associated with SACS mean score (with a higher score in forensic psychiatric staff compared with staff in adult and child and adolescent psychiatry), when controlling for gender, age and work experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Differences in attitudes are predominantly linked to professional training and structural surroundings. Professionals in adult psychiatry and child and adolescent psychiatry are more critical than staff in forensic settings, with an emphasis on patients' rights and individuals' integrity. Further studies are needed on how mental health professionals view coercion, and how actual use of coercion is influenced by staff attitudes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9038,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Open","volume":"11 5","pages":"e195"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12451713/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2025.10808","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Attitudes of mental health professionals toward coercion are a potential tool in reducing the use of coercive measures in psychiatry.

Aims: This study, part of the nationwide Attitudes toward Coercion (AttCo) project, aimed to assess staff attitudes on a nationwide and multiprofessional scale across adult, child and adolescent, and forensic psychiatric departments.

Method: During 9 weeks in 2023, 1702 psychiatric staff members across Germany filled out a survey including gender, age, profession, work experience and setting, and the validated Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale (SACS). Analyses of variance and multivariate regression analysis for SACS mean overall score were computed to assess group differences.

Results: Participants largely supported that coercion could be reduced with more time and personal contact (mean 4.20, range 1-5), and that coercion can harm the therapeutic relationship (mean 4.08); however, they acknowledged that coercion sometimes needs to be used for security reasons (mean 4.10). Regarding group differences, specialisation (P < 0.001) and professional affiliation (P = 0.008) remained significantly associated with SACS mean score (with a higher score in forensic psychiatric staff compared with staff in adult and child and adolescent psychiatry), when controlling for gender, age and work experience.

Conclusions: Differences in attitudes are predominantly linked to professional training and structural surroundings. Professionals in adult psychiatry and child and adolescent psychiatry are more critical than staff in forensic settings, with an emphasis on patients' rights and individuals' integrity. Further studies are needed on how mental health professionals view coercion, and how actual use of coercion is influenced by staff attitudes.

精神科工作人员对胁迫的态度:全国AttCo研究。
背景:精神卫生专业人员对胁迫的态度是减少精神病学胁迫措施使用的潜在工具。目的:本研究是全国强迫态度(AttCo)项目的一部分,旨在评估全国和多专业范围内成人、儿童和青少年以及法医精神科的工作人员的态度。方法:于2023年9周内,对德国各地1702名精神科工作人员进行性别、年龄、职业、工作经历、工作环境等问卷调查,并使用经验证的员工胁迫态度量表(SACS)进行问卷调查。计算SACS平均总分的方差分析和多变量回归分析,评估组间差异。结果:大部分参与者支持强迫行为可以随着时间和个人接触的增加而减少(平均4.20,范围1-5),并且强迫行为会损害治疗关系(平均4.08);然而,他们承认,出于安全原因,有时需要使用强制手段(平均4.10)。在群体差异方面,在控制性别、年龄和工作经验的情况下,专业化(P < 0.001)和专业隶属关系(P = 0.008)与SACS平均得分仍然显著相关(法医精神病学工作人员的得分高于成人、儿童和青少年精神病学工作人员)。结论:态度差异主要与专业训练和结构环境有关。成人精神病学以及儿童和青少年精神病学的专业人员比法医工作人员更重要,他们强调患者的权利和个人的诚信。需要进一步研究精神卫生专业人员如何看待胁迫,以及工作人员的态度如何影响胁迫的实际使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJPsych Open
BJPsych Open Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
610
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Announcing the launch of BJPsych Open, an exciting new open access online journal for the publication of all methodologically sound research in all fields of psychiatry and disciplines related to mental health. BJPsych Open will maintain the highest scientific, peer review, and ethical standards of the BJPsych, ensure rapid publication for authors whilst sharing research with no cost to the reader in the spirit of maximising dissemination and public engagement. Cascade submission from BJPsych to BJPsych Open is a new option for authors whose first priority is rapid online publication with the prestigious BJPsych brand. Authors will also retain copyright to their works under a creative commons license.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信