Sungho Bea, C Andrew Basham, Heba H Edrees, Krista F Huybrechts, Seanna M Vine, Robert J Glynn, Brian T Bateman, Katsiaryna Bykov
{"title":"Risk of Opioid Overdose Associated with Concurrent Use of Hydrocodone and CYP3A4-inhibiting Calcium Channel Blockers: A Population-based Cohort Study.","authors":"Sungho Bea, C Andrew Basham, Heba H Edrees, Krista F Huybrechts, Seanna M Vine, Robert J Glynn, Brian T Bateman, Katsiaryna Bykov","doi":"10.1093/aje/kwaf198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (CCBs), including diltiazem and verapamil, inhibit cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4), an enzyme involved in the metabolism of hydrocodone, the most commonly used opioid in the United States (US). This study evaluated whether concomitant use of hydrocodone with CYP3A4-inhibiting CCBs increases the risk of opioid overdose compared to use of hydrocodone with amlodipine, a CCB that does not inhibit CYP3A4. Using three US databases (2000-2021), two cohorts were identified: (1) hydrocodone initiation while on CCB; and (2) CCB initiation while on hydrocodone. The outcome was hospitalization or emergency department visits for opioid overdose. Propensity score matching weights were applied to balance confounders, and Cox regression estimated hazard ratios (HRs), pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. In hydrocodone initiation cohort (mean age 61.2 years; 53.8% female), weighted incidence rates were 2.8 and 2.6 per 1,000 person-years, with a weighted HR of 1.07 (95% CI, 0.90-1.29). In CCB initiation cohort (mean age 55.2 years; 59.9% female), weighted incidence rates were 6.5 and 6.0, yielding an HR of 1.08 (95% CI, 0.88-1.32). The pooled HR was 1.07 (95% CI, 0.94-1.23). Concomitant use of hydrocodone with CYP3A4-inhibiting CCBs was not associated with an increased risk of opioid overdose relative to amlodipine.</p>","PeriodicalId":7472,"journal":{"name":"American journal of epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwaf198","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (CCBs), including diltiazem and verapamil, inhibit cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4), an enzyme involved in the metabolism of hydrocodone, the most commonly used opioid in the United States (US). This study evaluated whether concomitant use of hydrocodone with CYP3A4-inhibiting CCBs increases the risk of opioid overdose compared to use of hydrocodone with amlodipine, a CCB that does not inhibit CYP3A4. Using three US databases (2000-2021), two cohorts were identified: (1) hydrocodone initiation while on CCB; and (2) CCB initiation while on hydrocodone. The outcome was hospitalization or emergency department visits for opioid overdose. Propensity score matching weights were applied to balance confounders, and Cox regression estimated hazard ratios (HRs), pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. In hydrocodone initiation cohort (mean age 61.2 years; 53.8% female), weighted incidence rates were 2.8 and 2.6 per 1,000 person-years, with a weighted HR of 1.07 (95% CI, 0.90-1.29). In CCB initiation cohort (mean age 55.2 years; 59.9% female), weighted incidence rates were 6.5 and 6.0, yielding an HR of 1.08 (95% CI, 0.88-1.32). The pooled HR was 1.07 (95% CI, 0.94-1.23). Concomitant use of hydrocodone with CYP3A4-inhibiting CCBs was not associated with an increased risk of opioid overdose relative to amlodipine.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Epidemiology is the oldest and one of the premier epidemiologic journals devoted to the publication of empirical research findings, opinion pieces, and methodological developments in the field of epidemiologic research.
It is a peer-reviewed journal aimed at both fellow epidemiologists and those who use epidemiologic data, including public health workers and clinicians.