{"title":"Meta-Analytic Review of the Short-Term Effects of Media Exposure on Children's Attention and Executive Functions","authors":"Ashley E. Hinten, Damian Scarf, Kana Imuta","doi":"10.1111/desc.70069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>There are long-held concerns regarding the impact of screen media on children's cognitive development. In particular, fast pace and fantastical events have been theorized to deplete children's cognitive resources, leading to reductions in their attention and executive functions (EF). To date, however, empirical tests of short-term effects of media pace and fantasy on children's cognition have yielded mixed findings. In the present study, we conducted meta-analytic syntheses of previous findings on the impact of pace (19 studies involving 141 effect sizes based on 1431 1.5- to 10-year-olds) and fantasy (16 studies involving 121 effect sizes based on 1297 1.5- to 6-year-olds) on children's attention and EF immediately after media exposure. Overall, our findings revealed that media pace does not affect children's cognition (<i>d</i> = –0.123, 95% CI [–0.331, 0.086], <i>p</i> = 0.23). In contrast, media fantasy was found to have a negative effect, wherein children who watched fantastical media compared to realistic media performed worse on attention and EF tasks immediately post-viewing (<i>d</i> = –0.244, 95% CI [–0.442, –0.046], <i>p</i> = 0.02). The large heterogeneity in effects for both pace (95% PI [–1.100, 0.854]) and fantasy (95% PI [–1.120, 0.632]), however, points to the complexity in conditions under which media exposure differentially impacts children's cognition—in some cases, negatively, in others positively, or not at all. Of the moderators tested, our findings point to the influence of facet of cognition examined (attention, cognitive flexibility, higher order EF, inhibitory control, working memory) on the strength of short-term media exposure effect.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Summary</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>Meta-analytic synthesis of previous findings from 19 studies showed no consistent pattern of short-term impact of media pace on children's attention and executive functions.</li>\n \n <li>Meta-analysis involving 16 studies that examined the effect of media fantasy revealed children's cognitive performance is worse immediately after viewing fantastical compared to realistic media.</li>\n \n <li>The influence of media exposure on children's post-viewing cognitive performance observed in a study must be considered in light of the study's methodology.</li>\n \n <li>Our findings suggest the complexity of contextual factors that interact to determine how screen media can both promote and hinder children's development.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48392,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Science","volume":"28 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/desc.70069","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/desc.70069","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
There are long-held concerns regarding the impact of screen media on children's cognitive development. In particular, fast pace and fantastical events have been theorized to deplete children's cognitive resources, leading to reductions in their attention and executive functions (EF). To date, however, empirical tests of short-term effects of media pace and fantasy on children's cognition have yielded mixed findings. In the present study, we conducted meta-analytic syntheses of previous findings on the impact of pace (19 studies involving 141 effect sizes based on 1431 1.5- to 10-year-olds) and fantasy (16 studies involving 121 effect sizes based on 1297 1.5- to 6-year-olds) on children's attention and EF immediately after media exposure. Overall, our findings revealed that media pace does not affect children's cognition (d = –0.123, 95% CI [–0.331, 0.086], p = 0.23). In contrast, media fantasy was found to have a negative effect, wherein children who watched fantastical media compared to realistic media performed worse on attention and EF tasks immediately post-viewing (d = –0.244, 95% CI [–0.442, –0.046], p = 0.02). The large heterogeneity in effects for both pace (95% PI [–1.100, 0.854]) and fantasy (95% PI [–1.120, 0.632]), however, points to the complexity in conditions under which media exposure differentially impacts children's cognition—in some cases, negatively, in others positively, or not at all. Of the moderators tested, our findings point to the influence of facet of cognition examined (attention, cognitive flexibility, higher order EF, inhibitory control, working memory) on the strength of short-term media exposure effect.
Summary
Meta-analytic synthesis of previous findings from 19 studies showed no consistent pattern of short-term impact of media pace on children's attention and executive functions.
Meta-analysis involving 16 studies that examined the effect of media fantasy revealed children's cognitive performance is worse immediately after viewing fantastical compared to realistic media.
The influence of media exposure on children's post-viewing cognitive performance observed in a study must be considered in light of the study's methodology.
Our findings suggest the complexity of contextual factors that interact to determine how screen media can both promote and hinder children's development.
期刊介绍:
Developmental Science publishes cutting-edge theory and up-to-the-minute research on scientific developmental psychology from leading thinkers in the field. It is currently the only journal that specifically focuses on human developmental cognitive neuroscience. Coverage includes: - Clinical, computational and comparative approaches to development - Key advances in cognitive and social development - Developmental cognitive neuroscience - Functional neuroimaging of the developing brain