The unbearable lightness of humanitarian reform: Reflections on calls for change in the sector

IF 2.6 3区 管理学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Disasters Pub Date : 2025-09-05 DOI:10.1111/disa.70006
Sherine El Taraboulsi-McCarthy DPhil
{"title":"The unbearable lightness of humanitarian reform: Reflections on calls for change in the sector","authors":"Sherine El Taraboulsi-McCarthy DPhil","doi":"10.1111/disa.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Despite significant rhetoric around reform, the humanitarian sector predominantly focuses on maintaining established structures with minimal actual change. The calls for reform are categorised into technocratic and participatory approaches. Technocratic reforms aim at increasing operational efficiency, whereas participatory efforts prioritise empowering local communities. However, both approaches fail to address the broader political and economic contexts and often overlook the needs and voices of local actors. Meaningful reform should focus on principled, context-specific international and local collaboration, which prioritises both lifesaving support, principled advocacy, and defence of international humanitarian law.</p>","PeriodicalId":48088,"journal":{"name":"Disasters","volume":"49 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disasters","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/disa.70006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite significant rhetoric around reform, the humanitarian sector predominantly focuses on maintaining established structures with minimal actual change. The calls for reform are categorised into technocratic and participatory approaches. Technocratic reforms aim at increasing operational efficiency, whereas participatory efforts prioritise empowering local communities. However, both approaches fail to address the broader political and economic contexts and often overlook the needs and voices of local actors. Meaningful reform should focus on principled, context-specific international and local collaboration, which prioritises both lifesaving support, principled advocacy, and defence of international humanitarian law.

人道主义改革的难以承受之轻:对该领域变革呼声的思考
尽管在改革方面有大量的花言巧语,但人道主义部门主要侧重于维持现有结构,实际变化最小。要求改革的呼声分为技术官僚和参与式两类。技术官僚改革旨在提高业务效率,而参与性努力则优先考虑赋予当地社区权力。然而,这两种方法都未能解决更广泛的政治和经济背景,而且往往忽视了当地行动者的需求和声音。有意义的改革应侧重于原则性的、具体情况的国际和地方合作,优先考虑救生支持、原则性宣传和捍卫国际人道法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Disasters
Disasters Multiple-
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.10%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: Disasters is a major, peer-reviewed quarterly journal reporting on all aspects of disaster studies, policy and management. It provides a forum for academics, policymakers and practitioners to publish high-quality research and practice concerning natural catastrophes, anthropogenic disasters, complex political emergencies and protracted crises around the world. The journal promotes the interchange of ideas and experience, maintaining a balance between field reports, case study articles of general interest and academic papers. Disasters: Is the leading journal in the field of disasters, protracted crises and complex emergencies Influences disaster prevention, mitigation and response policies and practices Adopts a world-wide geographical perspective Contains a mix of academic papers and field studies Promotes the interchange of ideas between practitioners, policy-makers and academics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信