{"title":"Impact of Buccal Bone Arch Contour on Bone Remodeling and Esthetics in Guided Bone Regeneration: A Retrospective Study","authors":"Minghao Zuo, Heng Zhang, Zhijian Xie, Yiqun Zhou","doi":"10.1111/cid.70086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To assess the stability of hard tissue following simultaneous guided bone regeneration (GBR) in the anterior maxilla, analyze the impact of the buccal bone arch contour on postoperative bone remodeling and restorative outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Patients who underwent anterior maxillary implantation and simultaneous GBR were included. Radiographic metrics were evaluated using preoperative, immediate postoperative, and follow-up cone beam computer tomography (CBCT) scans, and esthetic indicators were extracted from follow-up clinical records. The buccal bone arch contour of the edentulous area was reconstructed using the mirror symmetry technique. Implants were grouped based on the relative position of the bone grafts and implant to the contour immediately after surgery for comparisons of radiographic and esthetic outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 66 patients (66 implants) were ultimately included. For simultaneous GBR in the anterior maxilla, a bone gain of approximately 0.55–0.75 units was expected for every additional unit of bone graft. Bone grafts augmented outside the buccal bone arch contour tended to resorb back to the contour, suggesting that excessive bone augmentation may not provide significant benefits. Implants placed more than 3 mm palatally from the contour tended to achieve greater buccal bone wall thickness and more predictable esthetic outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The buccal bone arch contour provides an individualized reference for determining the appropriate bone graft volume and implant position. Placing the implant at least 2 mm palatally from the contour and augmenting bone grafts to exceed the contour by at least 1 mm appears to be a practical and effective strategy.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50679,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","volume":"27 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cid.70086","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
To assess the stability of hard tissue following simultaneous guided bone regeneration (GBR) in the anterior maxilla, analyze the impact of the buccal bone arch contour on postoperative bone remodeling and restorative outcomes.
Methods
Patients who underwent anterior maxillary implantation and simultaneous GBR were included. Radiographic metrics were evaluated using preoperative, immediate postoperative, and follow-up cone beam computer tomography (CBCT) scans, and esthetic indicators were extracted from follow-up clinical records. The buccal bone arch contour of the edentulous area was reconstructed using the mirror symmetry technique. Implants were grouped based on the relative position of the bone grafts and implant to the contour immediately after surgery for comparisons of radiographic and esthetic outcomes.
Results
A total of 66 patients (66 implants) were ultimately included. For simultaneous GBR in the anterior maxilla, a bone gain of approximately 0.55–0.75 units was expected for every additional unit of bone graft. Bone grafts augmented outside the buccal bone arch contour tended to resorb back to the contour, suggesting that excessive bone augmentation may not provide significant benefits. Implants placed more than 3 mm palatally from the contour tended to achieve greater buccal bone wall thickness and more predictable esthetic outcomes.
Conclusions
The buccal bone arch contour provides an individualized reference for determining the appropriate bone graft volume and implant position. Placing the implant at least 2 mm palatally from the contour and augmenting bone grafts to exceed the contour by at least 1 mm appears to be a practical and effective strategy.
期刊介绍:
The goal of Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research is to advance the scientific and technical aspects relating to dental implants and related scientific subjects. Dissemination of new and evolving information related to dental implants and the related science is the primary goal of our journal.
The range of topics covered by the journals will include but be not limited to:
New scientific developments relating to bone
Implant surfaces and their relationship to the surrounding tissues
Computer aided implant designs
Computer aided prosthetic designs
Immediate implant loading
Immediate implant placement
Materials relating to bone induction and conduction
New surgical methods relating to implant placement
New materials and methods relating to implant restorations
Methods for determining implant stability
A primary focus of the journal is publication of evidenced based articles evaluating to new dental implants, techniques and multicenter studies evaluating these treatments. In addition basic science research relating to wound healing and osseointegration will be an important focus for the journal.