The Neural Correlates of Response Inhibition With and Without Conflict in ADHD: An Activation Likelihood Estimation Meta-Analysis

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Sarah Daviddi, Valerio Santangelo
{"title":"The Neural Correlates of Response Inhibition With and Without Conflict in ADHD: An Activation Likelihood Estimation Meta-Analysis","authors":"Sarah Daviddi,&nbsp;Valerio Santangelo","doi":"10.1111/ejn.70244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a prevalent neurodevelopmental disorder marked—among other features—by impairments in response inhibition, a complex cognitive process assessable through tasks that either involve conflict suppression (C tasks) or do not (no-C tasks). Previous research has linked impaired response inhibition in ADHD primarily to structural and functional abnormalities in fronto-striatal and fronto-parietal networks. However, it remains unclear how these neural circuits differentially support performance on C and no-C tasks in individuals with ADHD. To address this question, we conducted a meta-analysis using the activation likelihood estimation (ALE) method. We included the available functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies (<i>N</i> = 30) examining children and adolescents with ADHD during C and no-C response inhibition tasks. Across both task types, ADHD participants consistently engaged a fronto-striatal circuit comprising the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), and caudate nuclei. When the analysis was restricted on C tasks, activation was primarily observed in the right IFG. In contrast, no-C tasks elicited activation in the left caudate nucleus, with the additional involvement of the right caudate and ACC during successful response inhibition (i.e., correct performance). These findings reveal a functional dissociation within frontal-striatal circuits during response inhibition in children and adolescents with ADHD, with the IFG specifically supporting conflict suppression, and the ACC and caudate nuclei contributing more to successful inhibition in tasks without conflict.</p>","PeriodicalId":11993,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Neuroscience","volume":"62 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejn.70244","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejn.70244","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a prevalent neurodevelopmental disorder marked—among other features—by impairments in response inhibition, a complex cognitive process assessable through tasks that either involve conflict suppression (C tasks) or do not (no-C tasks). Previous research has linked impaired response inhibition in ADHD primarily to structural and functional abnormalities in fronto-striatal and fronto-parietal networks. However, it remains unclear how these neural circuits differentially support performance on C and no-C tasks in individuals with ADHD. To address this question, we conducted a meta-analysis using the activation likelihood estimation (ALE) method. We included the available functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies (N = 30) examining children and adolescents with ADHD during C and no-C response inhibition tasks. Across both task types, ADHD participants consistently engaged a fronto-striatal circuit comprising the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), and caudate nuclei. When the analysis was restricted on C tasks, activation was primarily observed in the right IFG. In contrast, no-C tasks elicited activation in the left caudate nucleus, with the additional involvement of the right caudate and ACC during successful response inhibition (i.e., correct performance). These findings reveal a functional dissociation within frontal-striatal circuits during response inhibition in children and adolescents with ADHD, with the IFG specifically supporting conflict suppression, and the ACC and caudate nuclei contributing more to successful inhibition in tasks without conflict.

Abstract Image

ADHD患者有冲突或无冲突的反应抑制的神经相关因素:激活似然估计meta分析
注意缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)是一种普遍的神经发育障碍,其特征之一是反应抑制障碍,反应抑制是一个复杂的认知过程,可以通过涉及冲突抑制(C任务)或不涉及冲突抑制(无C任务)的任务来评估。先前的研究已经将ADHD的反应抑制受损主要与额纹状体和额顶叶网络的结构和功能异常联系起来。然而,目前尚不清楚这些神经回路如何在ADHD个体中支持C和非C任务的表现。为了解决这个问题,我们使用激活似然估计(ALE)方法进行了荟萃分析。我们纳入了现有的功能性磁共振成像(fMRI)研究(N = 30),检查患有ADHD的儿童和青少年在C和无C反应抑制任务中的表现。在这两种任务类型中,ADHD参与者始终使用额纹状体回路,包括额下回(IFG)、前扣带皮层(ACC)和尾状核。当分析仅限于C任务时,激活主要在右侧IFG中观察到。相反,无c任务激活左尾状核,在成功的反应抑制(即正确的表现)期间,额外参与右尾状核和ACC。这些发现揭示了儿童和青少年多动症患者在反应抑制过程中额纹状体回路的功能分离,其中IFG特别支持冲突抑制,ACC和尾状核对无冲突任务的成功抑制贡献更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Neuroscience
European Journal of Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
305
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: EJN is the journal of FENS and supports the international neuroscientific community by publishing original high quality research articles and reviews in all fields of neuroscience. In addition, to engage with issues that are of interest to the science community, we also publish Editorials, Meetings Reports and Neuro-Opinions on topics that are of current interest in the fields of neuroscience research and training in science. We have recently established a series of ‘Profiles of Women in Neuroscience’. Our goal is to provide a vehicle for publications that further the understanding of the structure and function of the nervous system in both health and disease and to provide a vehicle to engage the neuroscience community. As the official journal of FENS, profits from the journal are re-invested in the neuroscientific community through the activities of FENS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信