Impact of soybean planting date and row width on weed suppression and yield

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Matthew Goddard, Maninder Pal Singh, Christy L. Sprague
{"title":"Impact of soybean planting date and row width on weed suppression and yield","authors":"Matthew Goddard,&nbsp;Maninder Pal Singh,&nbsp;Christy L. Sprague","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Variable weather patterns and extended growing seasons over the last couple of decades have prompted growers to plant soybean [<i>Glycine max</i> (L.) Merr.] earlier than the historical standard. Field experiments were conducted in Michigan over three site-years to evaluate soybean planting date, row width, and herbicide program on weed suppression and soybean yield. Planting date had minimal impact on soybean stand, except at one site-year where soil crusting reduced stand 44%–52% in early (April 12–21) compared with the typical planting date (May 11–23). Weed densities and biomass for the untreated controls were substantially higher in early compared with the typical planting in all site-years. Soybean planted in 19 cm rows (370,500 and 494,000 seeds ha<sup>−1</sup>) reduced weed biomass 29%–47% compared with 76 cm rows (370,500 seeds ha<sup>−1</sup>) in two of three site-years when weeds were not controlled; however, the effects of row width were not observed when a PRE herbicide was applied. Similarly, narrow row widths (&lt;76 cm) resulted in quicker canopy closure compared with 76 cm rows in two of three site-years. Regardless of row width, a PRE followed by a POST herbicide program provided the most consistent weed control. Soybean yield was 7% greater for 19 cm rows at 494,000 seeds ha<sup>−1</sup> compared with 76 cm rows in two of three site-years. However, planting date did not affect soybean yield when weed control was good in all site-years. Overall, combining narrow row widths with a complete herbicide program is equally beneficial for soybean planted early and at typical planting dates.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"117 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.70155","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.70155","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Variable weather patterns and extended growing seasons over the last couple of decades have prompted growers to plant soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] earlier than the historical standard. Field experiments were conducted in Michigan over three site-years to evaluate soybean planting date, row width, and herbicide program on weed suppression and soybean yield. Planting date had minimal impact on soybean stand, except at one site-year where soil crusting reduced stand 44%–52% in early (April 12–21) compared with the typical planting date (May 11–23). Weed densities and biomass for the untreated controls were substantially higher in early compared with the typical planting in all site-years. Soybean planted in 19 cm rows (370,500 and 494,000 seeds ha−1) reduced weed biomass 29%–47% compared with 76 cm rows (370,500 seeds ha−1) in two of three site-years when weeds were not controlled; however, the effects of row width were not observed when a PRE herbicide was applied. Similarly, narrow row widths (<76 cm) resulted in quicker canopy closure compared with 76 cm rows in two of three site-years. Regardless of row width, a PRE followed by a POST herbicide program provided the most consistent weed control. Soybean yield was 7% greater for 19 cm rows at 494,000 seeds ha−1 compared with 76 cm rows in two of three site-years. However, planting date did not affect soybean yield when weed control was good in all site-years. Overall, combining narrow row widths with a complete herbicide program is equally beneficial for soybean planted early and at typical planting dates.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

大豆播种日期和行宽对杂草抑制和产量的影响
在过去的几十年里,多变的天气模式和延长的生长季节促使种植者种植大豆。稳定。比历史标准早。在密歇根州进行了为期3个立地年的田间试验,以评价大豆种植日期、行宽和除草剂施用对杂草抑制和大豆产量的影响。植树期对大豆林分的影响最小,但有一个立地年土壤结皮较典型植树期(5月11-23日)早期(4月12-21日)减少44%-52%。在所有立地年,未处理对照的杂草密度和生物量在早期都明显高于典型种植。在杂草不受控制的3个立地年中,种植在19 cm行(370,500和494,000种子ha - 1)的大豆比种植在76 cm行(370,500种子ha - 1)的大豆减少了29%-47%的杂草生物量;然而,当施用PRE除草剂时,未观察到行宽的影响。同样,窄行宽(76厘米)与76厘米行宽相比,在3个立地年中的2个立地年导致冠层关闭得更快。无论行宽如何,PRE除草剂和POST除草剂都能提供最一致的杂草控制。在3个立地年中,有2个立地年,19厘米行494,000粒/公顷的大豆产量比76厘米行高出7%。在所有立地年份杂草控制良好的情况下,播种日期对大豆产量没有影响。总的来说,将窄行宽与完整的除草剂计划相结合,对早期种植和典型种植日期种植的大豆同样有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agronomy Journal
Agronomy Journal 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
265
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture. Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信