Three-Phase Evaluation of Fire-Exposed Reinforced Concrete Beams: Methodology and Outcomes

IF 2.4 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Aminuddin Suhaimi, Izni Syahrizal Ibrahim, Mariyana Aida Ab. Kadir, Noor Azim Mohd. Radzi
{"title":"Three-Phase Evaluation of Fire-Exposed Reinforced Concrete Beams: Methodology and Outcomes","authors":"Aminuddin Suhaimi,&nbsp;Izni Syahrizal Ibrahim,&nbsp;Mariyana Aida Ab. Kadir,&nbsp;Noor Azim Mohd. Radzi","doi":"10.1007/s10694-025-01755-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study introduces an improved three-phase evaluation approach to assess the residual strength and structural response of reinforced concrete (RC) beams subjected to fire exposure. Highlighting the potential for RC structures to be utilized again after fire incidents, this research emphasizes the need for comprehensive assessment and rectification to determine their remaining strength. The methodology employs a systematic approach, segmented into three essential phases: pre-fire testing (conducted at room temperature), fire testing including a cooling phase, and post-fire (residual) testing. These evaluations were carried out on two full-scale beam specimens, each 200 mm wide, 300 mm deep, and spanning 2000 mm in length. One RC beam was not exposed to fire, while the other one was subjected to fire on three sides. Each RC beam was then tested under the four-point bending setup until failure to determine the remaining strength. The furnace temperature curve was also compared with BS 476-20 and ASTM E119-00a standard fire curves for reference. The investigation revealed that factors such as thermal degradation of the concrete and pre-loading significantly affect the post-fire performance of the RC beam, leading to irrecoverable plastic deformation. This was evidenced by a 26% reduction in ultimate load and a 51% decrease in secant stiffness for the fire-exposed beam. Additionally, the beam exhibited a 5 mm residual deflection in the unloaded state and a significant 75.8% increase in deflection at ultimate load, rising from 22.3 to 39.2 mm. Further analysis demonstrated the limitations of the 500 °C Isotherm method, which underestimated residual capacity by 16.5%, compared with Finite Element Analysis simulations that closely matched experimental results with only a 1.2% difference. The proposed three-phase evaluation not only deepens the understanding of the structural behavior under fire exposure but also provides a systematic framework for assessing its continued usage throughout its service life.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":558,"journal":{"name":"Fire Technology","volume":"61 5","pages":"3779 - 3815"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10694-025-01755-5.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fire Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10694-025-01755-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study introduces an improved three-phase evaluation approach to assess the residual strength and structural response of reinforced concrete (RC) beams subjected to fire exposure. Highlighting the potential for RC structures to be utilized again after fire incidents, this research emphasizes the need for comprehensive assessment and rectification to determine their remaining strength. The methodology employs a systematic approach, segmented into three essential phases: pre-fire testing (conducted at room temperature), fire testing including a cooling phase, and post-fire (residual) testing. These evaluations were carried out on two full-scale beam specimens, each 200 mm wide, 300 mm deep, and spanning 2000 mm in length. One RC beam was not exposed to fire, while the other one was subjected to fire on three sides. Each RC beam was then tested under the four-point bending setup until failure to determine the remaining strength. The furnace temperature curve was also compared with BS 476-20 and ASTM E119-00a standard fire curves for reference. The investigation revealed that factors such as thermal degradation of the concrete and pre-loading significantly affect the post-fire performance of the RC beam, leading to irrecoverable plastic deformation. This was evidenced by a 26% reduction in ultimate load and a 51% decrease in secant stiffness for the fire-exposed beam. Additionally, the beam exhibited a 5 mm residual deflection in the unloaded state and a significant 75.8% increase in deflection at ultimate load, rising from 22.3 to 39.2 mm. Further analysis demonstrated the limitations of the 500 °C Isotherm method, which underestimated residual capacity by 16.5%, compared with Finite Element Analysis simulations that closely matched experimental results with only a 1.2% difference. The proposed three-phase evaluation not only deepens the understanding of the structural behavior under fire exposure but also provides a systematic framework for assessing its continued usage throughout its service life.

火灾暴露钢筋混凝土梁的三阶段评估:方法和结果
本研究介绍了一种改进的三相评估方法来评估火灾下钢筋混凝土(RC)梁的剩余强度和结构响应。本研究强调RC结构在火灾事故后再次使用的潜力,强调需要进行综合评估和整改,以确定其剩余强度。该方法采用系统的方法,分为三个基本阶段:着火前测试(在室温下进行),包括冷却阶段的着火测试,以及着火后(残余)测试。这些评估是在两个全尺寸梁样本上进行的,每个样本宽200毫米,深300毫米,长度为2000毫米。一根钢筋混凝土梁未受火,而另一根梁三面受火。然后在四点弯曲设置下对每个RC梁进行测试,直到失效以确定剩余强度。并将炉温曲线与BS 476-20和ASTM E119-00a标准火焰曲线进行对比,以供参考。研究表明,混凝土的热降解和预加载等因素对RC梁的火灾后性能有显著影响,导致不可恢复的塑性变形。火灾暴露梁的极限载荷降低了26%,割线刚度降低了51%,证明了这一点。此外,梁在卸载状态下表现出5 mm的残余挠度,在极限荷载下挠度显著增加75.8%,从22.3 mm增加到39.2 mm。进一步的分析表明了500°C等温线方法的局限性,与有限元分析模拟相比,它低估了16.5%的剩余容量,与实验结果非常接近,只有1.2%的差异。提出的三阶段评估不仅加深了对火灾暴露下结构行为的理解,而且为评估其在整个使用寿命期间的持续使用提供了一个系统框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Fire Technology
Fire Technology 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
14.70%
发文量
137
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Fire Technology publishes original contributions, both theoretical and empirical, that contribute to the solution of problems in fire safety science and engineering. It is the leading journal in the field, publishing applied research dealing with the full range of actual and potential fire hazards facing humans and the environment. It covers the entire domain of fire safety science and engineering problems relevant in industrial, operational, cultural, and environmental applications, including modeling, testing, detection, suppression, human behavior, wildfires, structures, and risk analysis. The aim of Fire Technology is to push forward the frontiers of knowledge and technology by encouraging interdisciplinary communication of significant technical developments in fire protection and subjects of scientific interest to the fire protection community at large. It is published in conjunction with the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) and the Society of Fire Protection Engineers (SFPE). The mission of NFPA is to help save lives and reduce loss with information, knowledge, and passion. The mission of SFPE is advancing the science and practice of fire protection engineering internationally.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信