Aminuddin Suhaimi, Izni Syahrizal Ibrahim, Mariyana Aida Ab. Kadir, Noor Azim Mohd. Radzi
{"title":"Three-Phase Evaluation of Fire-Exposed Reinforced Concrete Beams: Methodology and Outcomes","authors":"Aminuddin Suhaimi, Izni Syahrizal Ibrahim, Mariyana Aida Ab. Kadir, Noor Azim Mohd. Radzi","doi":"10.1007/s10694-025-01755-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study introduces an improved three-phase evaluation approach to assess the residual strength and structural response of reinforced concrete (RC) beams subjected to fire exposure. Highlighting the potential for RC structures to be utilized again after fire incidents, this research emphasizes the need for comprehensive assessment and rectification to determine their remaining strength. The methodology employs a systematic approach, segmented into three essential phases: pre-fire testing (conducted at room temperature), fire testing including a cooling phase, and post-fire (residual) testing. These evaluations were carried out on two full-scale beam specimens, each 200 mm wide, 300 mm deep, and spanning 2000 mm in length. One RC beam was not exposed to fire, while the other one was subjected to fire on three sides. Each RC beam was then tested under the four-point bending setup until failure to determine the remaining strength. The furnace temperature curve was also compared with BS 476-20 and ASTM E119-00a standard fire curves for reference. The investigation revealed that factors such as thermal degradation of the concrete and pre-loading significantly affect the post-fire performance of the RC beam, leading to irrecoverable plastic deformation. This was evidenced by a 26% reduction in ultimate load and a 51% decrease in secant stiffness for the fire-exposed beam. Additionally, the beam exhibited a 5 mm residual deflection in the unloaded state and a significant 75.8% increase in deflection at ultimate load, rising from 22.3 to 39.2 mm. Further analysis demonstrated the limitations of the 500 °C Isotherm method, which underestimated residual capacity by 16.5%, compared with Finite Element Analysis simulations that closely matched experimental results with only a 1.2% difference. The proposed three-phase evaluation not only deepens the understanding of the structural behavior under fire exposure but also provides a systematic framework for assessing its continued usage throughout its service life.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":558,"journal":{"name":"Fire Technology","volume":"61 5","pages":"3779 - 3815"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10694-025-01755-5.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fire Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10694-025-01755-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study introduces an improved three-phase evaluation approach to assess the residual strength and structural response of reinforced concrete (RC) beams subjected to fire exposure. Highlighting the potential for RC structures to be utilized again after fire incidents, this research emphasizes the need for comprehensive assessment and rectification to determine their remaining strength. The methodology employs a systematic approach, segmented into three essential phases: pre-fire testing (conducted at room temperature), fire testing including a cooling phase, and post-fire (residual) testing. These evaluations were carried out on two full-scale beam specimens, each 200 mm wide, 300 mm deep, and spanning 2000 mm in length. One RC beam was not exposed to fire, while the other one was subjected to fire on three sides. Each RC beam was then tested under the four-point bending setup until failure to determine the remaining strength. The furnace temperature curve was also compared with BS 476-20 and ASTM E119-00a standard fire curves for reference. The investigation revealed that factors such as thermal degradation of the concrete and pre-loading significantly affect the post-fire performance of the RC beam, leading to irrecoverable plastic deformation. This was evidenced by a 26% reduction in ultimate load and a 51% decrease in secant stiffness for the fire-exposed beam. Additionally, the beam exhibited a 5 mm residual deflection in the unloaded state and a significant 75.8% increase in deflection at ultimate load, rising from 22.3 to 39.2 mm. Further analysis demonstrated the limitations of the 500 °C Isotherm method, which underestimated residual capacity by 16.5%, compared with Finite Element Analysis simulations that closely matched experimental results with only a 1.2% difference. The proposed three-phase evaluation not only deepens the understanding of the structural behavior under fire exposure but also provides a systematic framework for assessing its continued usage throughout its service life.
期刊介绍:
Fire Technology publishes original contributions, both theoretical and empirical, that contribute to the solution of problems in fire safety science and engineering. It is the leading journal in the field, publishing applied research dealing with the full range of actual and potential fire hazards facing humans and the environment. It covers the entire domain of fire safety science and engineering problems relevant in industrial, operational, cultural, and environmental applications, including modeling, testing, detection, suppression, human behavior, wildfires, structures, and risk analysis.
The aim of Fire Technology is to push forward the frontiers of knowledge and technology by encouraging interdisciplinary communication of significant technical developments in fire protection and subjects of scientific interest to the fire protection community at large.
It is published in conjunction with the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) and the Society of Fire Protection Engineers (SFPE). The mission of NFPA is to help save lives and reduce loss with information, knowledge, and passion. The mission of SFPE is advancing the science and practice of fire protection engineering internationally.