Global Hotspots for Sea-Level Changes: Decadal Extremes and Uncertainties From CMIP6 Models

IF 2.6 3区 地球科学 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Salah Basem Ajjur, Emanuele Di Lorenzo, Baylor Fox-Kemper
{"title":"Global Hotspots for Sea-Level Changes: Decadal Extremes and Uncertainties From CMIP6 Models","authors":"Salah Basem Ajjur,&nbsp;Emanuele Di Lorenzo,&nbsp;Baylor Fox-Kemper","doi":"10.1029/2025EA004402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Knowledge is limited regarding decadal extremes and uncertainties of sea-level change (SLC) at the regional scale, which necessitates the need for better understanding of these changes to enhance future coastal preparedness. To this end, we examined sea-level extremes for 23 World reference regions based on tide gauges (TGs) observations from 1950 to 2014. We then used these observations to evaluate the fidelity of climate models and earth system models (ESMs) participating in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6), using trend analysis, correlation coefficient and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) as metrics. Our findings show the spatial distribution of SLC varies between −10.0 and 6.52 mm/yr, with an area-weighted global average of 1.29 ± 0.32 mm/yr. Five regions display rapid increasing rates exceeding twice the global average: E. and C. North-America, N. Central-America, W. C. Asia, and S. E. Asia. Together, these regions constitute 26% of the total analyzed area. The CMIP6 simulations, especially ESMs, have a systematic underestimation of SLC, compared with TGs. We found poor agreement between CMIP6 simulations and TGs (weak correlation and larger RMSE) in subtropical North Atlantic regions and W. Central Asia. Our findings facilitate a multifactor hazard regional analysis that includes SLC alongside temperature, precipitation, and other parameters. It also identifies directions for future model development toward better detecting extremes and narrowing uncertainties in sea level simulations.</p>","PeriodicalId":54286,"journal":{"name":"Earth and Space Science","volume":"12 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2025EA004402","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth and Space Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025EA004402","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Knowledge is limited regarding decadal extremes and uncertainties of sea-level change (SLC) at the regional scale, which necessitates the need for better understanding of these changes to enhance future coastal preparedness. To this end, we examined sea-level extremes for 23 World reference regions based on tide gauges (TGs) observations from 1950 to 2014. We then used these observations to evaluate the fidelity of climate models and earth system models (ESMs) participating in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6), using trend analysis, correlation coefficient and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) as metrics. Our findings show the spatial distribution of SLC varies between −10.0 and 6.52 mm/yr, with an area-weighted global average of 1.29 ± 0.32 mm/yr. Five regions display rapid increasing rates exceeding twice the global average: E. and C. North-America, N. Central-America, W. C. Asia, and S. E. Asia. Together, these regions constitute 26% of the total analyzed area. The CMIP6 simulations, especially ESMs, have a systematic underestimation of SLC, compared with TGs. We found poor agreement between CMIP6 simulations and TGs (weak correlation and larger RMSE) in subtropical North Atlantic regions and W. Central Asia. Our findings facilitate a multifactor hazard regional analysis that includes SLC alongside temperature, precipitation, and other parameters. It also identifies directions for future model development toward better detecting extremes and narrowing uncertainties in sea level simulations.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

海平面变化的全球热点:来自CMIP6模式的年代际极值和不确定性
关于十年极端和区域尺度海平面变化(SLC)的不确定性的知识是有限的,这就需要更好地了解这些变化,以加强未来的沿海准备。为此,我们基于1950年至2014年的潮汐计(TGs)观测,研究了23个世界参考地区的海平面极端值。然后,我们利用这些观测资料,利用趋势分析、相关系数和均方根误差(RMSE)作为度量指标,对参与耦合模式比对项目第6阶段(CMIP6)的气候模式和地球系统模式(esm)的保真度进行了评估。研究结果表明,SLC的空间分布在- 10.0 ~ 6.52 mm/yr之间,全球面积加权平均值为1.29±0.32 mm/yr。五个区域的快速增长速度超过全球平均水平的两倍:北美东部和中部、中美洲北部、亚洲西部和东南亚。这些区域加起来占分析总面积的26%。与tg相比,CMIP6模拟,特别是esm,系统地低估了SLC。我们发现CMIP6模拟与亚热带北大西洋地区和中亚西部地区的TGs(弱相关和较大的RMSE)之间的一致性较差。我们的发现促进了包括SLC、温度、降水和其他参数在内的多因素危害区域分析。它还确定了未来模式发展的方向,以更好地探测极端情况和缩小海平面模拟中的不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Earth and Space Science
Earth and Space Science Earth and Planetary Sciences-General Earth and Planetary Sciences
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
285
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Marking AGU’s second new open access journal in the last 12 months, Earth and Space Science is the only journal that reflects the expansive range of science represented by AGU’s 62,000 members, including all of the Earth, planetary, and space sciences, and related fields in environmental science, geoengineering, space engineering, and biogeochemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信