{"title":"Helical Body Axis Orientations in Human Embryonic Development","authors":"Sena Fujii, Shigehito Yamada, Tetsuya Takakuwa","doi":"10.1002/bdr2.2527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>In mouse embryos, the body axis typically follows a right-handed helical pattern; however, a definitive orientation in human embryos has not been established. This study aimed to characterize the body axis orientation in human embryos (CS13–CS17) from the Kyoto Collection.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Embryos were classified as right-helical (RH), left-helical (LH), and middle (M) using MRI-based morphological assessment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>RH orientation was predominant at CS13, whereas it became comparable to LH at CS14. From CS15 to CS17, LH became dominant, nearly doubling the frequency of RH by CS15. The proportion of M-pattern embryos increased with advancing Carnegie Stages, reaching 70% at CS17. As vertebral column chondrification begins at CS17–18, these findings suggest that the helical body axis is established before chondrogenesis, particularly during CS13–CS15. Internal organ laterality (stomach, heart, intestines, and liver) appeared consistent among body axis orientations in CS15–CS17 embryos.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The results demonstrate substantial variability in human embryonic body axis orientation, in contrast to the well-defined pattern in mice, and provide insights into body axis formation in human embryos and their potential role in left–right asymmetry.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9121,"journal":{"name":"Birth Defects Research","volume":"117 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Birth Defects Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bdr2.2527","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
In mouse embryos, the body axis typically follows a right-handed helical pattern; however, a definitive orientation in human embryos has not been established. This study aimed to characterize the body axis orientation in human embryos (CS13–CS17) from the Kyoto Collection.
Methods
Embryos were classified as right-helical (RH), left-helical (LH), and middle (M) using MRI-based morphological assessment.
Results
RH orientation was predominant at CS13, whereas it became comparable to LH at CS14. From CS15 to CS17, LH became dominant, nearly doubling the frequency of RH by CS15. The proportion of M-pattern embryos increased with advancing Carnegie Stages, reaching 70% at CS17. As vertebral column chondrification begins at CS17–18, these findings suggest that the helical body axis is established before chondrogenesis, particularly during CS13–CS15. Internal organ laterality (stomach, heart, intestines, and liver) appeared consistent among body axis orientations in CS15–CS17 embryos.
Conclusion
The results demonstrate substantial variability in human embryonic body axis orientation, in contrast to the well-defined pattern in mice, and provide insights into body axis formation in human embryos and their potential role in left–right asymmetry.
期刊介绍:
The journal Birth Defects Research publishes original research and reviews in areas related to the etiology of adverse developmental and reproductive outcome. In particular the journal is devoted to the publication of original scientific research that contributes to the understanding of the biology of embryonic development and the prenatal causative factors and mechanisms leading to adverse pregnancy outcomes, namely structural and functional birth defects, pregnancy loss, postnatal functional defects in the human population, and to the identification of prenatal factors and biological mechanisms that reduce these risks.
Adverse reproductive and developmental outcomes may have genetic, environmental, nutritional or epigenetic causes. Accordingly, the journal Birth Defects Research takes an integrated, multidisciplinary approach in its organization and publication strategy. The journal Birth Defects Research contains separate sections for clinical and molecular teratology, developmental and reproductive toxicology, and reviews in developmental biology to acknowledge and accommodate the integrative nature of research in this field. Each section has a dedicated editor who is a leader in his/her field and who has full editorial authority in his/her area.