Two weeks to tune in: Evaluating the effects of a short-term body scan on interoception

IF 3.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Andreas R. Schwerdtfeger, Bernhard Weber, Christian Rominger
{"title":"Two weeks to tune in: Evaluating the effects of a short-term body scan on interoception","authors":"Andreas R. Schwerdtfeger,&nbsp;Bernhard Weber,&nbsp;Christian Rominger","doi":"10.1111/aphw.70073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Mindfulness practices, such as the body scan, could enhance interoception. While prior research shows promise for its effects on interoceptive sensibility (IS; subjective experience of bodily cues) and accuracy (IAcc; accurate detection of bodily signals), studies often use a limited set of interoceptive variables or apply small samples. In two pre-registered randomized trials, we examined a 2-week daily auditory body scan intervention vs. active control (guided imagery; Study 1) or passive control (Study 2). Study 1 included N = 85 participants (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 22.26, 71% women), randomized to body scan or guided imagery. Study 2 included N = 90 participants (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 23.05, 80% women), randomized to body scan or passive control. IAcc was measured pre- and post-intervention using the heartbeat tracking task (HTT) and heartbeat discrimination task (HDT), while IS was assessed via confidence ratings and the multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness (MAIA-2). Study 1 showed significant time effects for IAcc (HTT: <i>p</i> &lt; .001; HDT: <i>p</i> = .012), confidence ratings (<i>p</i>'s &lt; .001), and MAIA-2 (<i>p</i> &lt; .001). Study 2 found improvements following the body scan for IAcc (HTT: <i>p</i> = .050), confidence ratings (HTT: <i>p</i> = .006; HDT: <i>p</i> = .0496), and MAIA-2 (<i>p</i> = .003). Findings suggest that body scan enhances interoception within two weeks, though guided imagery and similar approaches may yield comparable effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":8127,"journal":{"name":"Applied psychology. Health and well-being","volume":"17 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://iaap-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aphw.70073","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied psychology. Health and well-being","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://iaap-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aphw.70073","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mindfulness practices, such as the body scan, could enhance interoception. While prior research shows promise for its effects on interoceptive sensibility (IS; subjective experience of bodily cues) and accuracy (IAcc; accurate detection of bodily signals), studies often use a limited set of interoceptive variables or apply small samples. In two pre-registered randomized trials, we examined a 2-week daily auditory body scan intervention vs. active control (guided imagery; Study 1) or passive control (Study 2). Study 1 included N = 85 participants (Mage = 22.26, 71% women), randomized to body scan or guided imagery. Study 2 included N = 90 participants (Mage = 23.05, 80% women), randomized to body scan or passive control. IAcc was measured pre- and post-intervention using the heartbeat tracking task (HTT) and heartbeat discrimination task (HDT), while IS was assessed via confidence ratings and the multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness (MAIA-2). Study 1 showed significant time effects for IAcc (HTT: p < .001; HDT: p = .012), confidence ratings (p's < .001), and MAIA-2 (p < .001). Study 2 found improvements following the body scan for IAcc (HTT: p = .050), confidence ratings (HTT: p = .006; HDT: p = .0496), and MAIA-2 (p = .003). Findings suggest that body scan enhances interoception within two weeks, though guided imagery and similar approaches may yield comparable effects.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

两周后收看:评估短期身体扫描对内感受的影响
正念练习,比如身体扫描,可以增强内感受。虽然先前的研究显示了它对内感受性的影响(IS;身体线索的主观体验)和准确性(IAcc;身体信号的准确检测),但研究通常使用有限的内感受变量集或应用小样本。在两项预先注册的随机试验中,我们检查了为期两周的每日听觉身体扫描干预与主动控制(引导成像;研究1)或被动控制(研究2)的对比。研究1包括N = 85名参与者(男性= 22.26,71%为女性),随机分为身体扫描组和引导成像组。研究2包括N = 90名参与者(男性= 23.05,80%为女性),随机分为身体扫描组和被动对照组。干预前和干预后的IAcc通过心跳追踪任务(HTT)和心跳辨别任务(HDT)来测量,而IS通过置信度评级和内感受意识多维评估(MAIA-2)来评估。研究1显示IAcc的时间效应显著(HTT: p < .001; HDT: p =)。012),信心评级(p's <;001)和MAIA-2 (p < .001)。研究2发现,IAcc全身扫描后的改善(HTT: p =)。050),信心评级(HTT: p = .006; HDT: p = .006)。0496)和MAIA-2 (p = .003)。研究结果表明,身体扫描可以在两周内增强内感受,尽管引导成像和类似的方法可能会产生类似的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being is a triannual peer-reviewed academic journal published by Wiley-Blackwell on behalf of the International Association of Applied Psychology. It was established in 2009 and covers applied psychology topics such as clinical psychology, counseling, cross-cultural psychology, and environmental psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信