A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of virtual reality nature effects on higher education students' mental health and wellbeing

IF 3.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Gill Hubbard, Philip Albert Verde, Alexia Barrable, Chris O'Malley, Nicholas Barnes, Paul Toner
{"title":"A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of virtual reality nature effects on higher education students' mental health and wellbeing","authors":"Gill Hubbard,&nbsp;Philip Albert Verde,&nbsp;Alexia Barrable,&nbsp;Chris O'Malley,&nbsp;Nicholas Barnes,&nbsp;Paul Toner","doi":"10.1111/aphw.70060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Virtual Reality nature (VRn) may deliver mental health and wellbeing without being outside in real nature. The main objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to report effects of VRn on mental health and wellbeing of students in higher education. To be eligible, participants were higher education students, the intervention was VRn, the outcome variable was a mental health parameter, and the study design was experimental. Information sources were: OVID (Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO), SCOPUS, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, PubMed and GreenFILE. Searches were conducted May 2023 and re-run November 2024. The modified Downs and Black checklist for randomised and non-randomised studies was used to assess risk of bias. To synthesise results, data were first extracted into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet and summarised in narrative, statistical and tabular formats. Twenty-four articles were included. Two studies were ‘good’ quality, 18 ‘fair’, and four ‘poor’. Total sample size was 1,419. Two studies compared VRn versus real nature, six VRn versus no intervention, seven VRn versus flat-screen. Twelve studies included forests as the only natural environment. Thirteen of 17, seven of eight, four of five, and four of seven studies reported pre-post intervention beneficial effects on self-reported mood, anxiety, stress and cognition, respectively. Nine of 13, six of 10 and all five studies that measured cardiovascular, skin conductivity and brain activity respectively, reported pre-post intervention beneficial effects. All five studies that measured anxiety, all three studies that measured mood, and all four studies that measured stress, found no significant differences between VRn and flat-screen images of nature. Caution is required drawing conclusions due to studies' quality and sample sizes. That said, the review suggests that nature replicated in VR shows promise for benefits to mental health and wellbeing in higher education students.</p>","PeriodicalId":8127,"journal":{"name":"Applied psychology. Health and well-being","volume":"17 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://iaap-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aphw.70060","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied psychology. Health and well-being","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://iaap-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aphw.70060","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Virtual Reality nature (VRn) may deliver mental health and wellbeing without being outside in real nature. The main objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to report effects of VRn on mental health and wellbeing of students in higher education. To be eligible, participants were higher education students, the intervention was VRn, the outcome variable was a mental health parameter, and the study design was experimental. Information sources were: OVID (Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO), SCOPUS, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, PubMed and GreenFILE. Searches were conducted May 2023 and re-run November 2024. The modified Downs and Black checklist for randomised and non-randomised studies was used to assess risk of bias. To synthesise results, data were first extracted into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet and summarised in narrative, statistical and tabular formats. Twenty-four articles were included. Two studies were ‘good’ quality, 18 ‘fair’, and four ‘poor’. Total sample size was 1,419. Two studies compared VRn versus real nature, six VRn versus no intervention, seven VRn versus flat-screen. Twelve studies included forests as the only natural environment. Thirteen of 17, seven of eight, four of five, and four of seven studies reported pre-post intervention beneficial effects on self-reported mood, anxiety, stress and cognition, respectively. Nine of 13, six of 10 and all five studies that measured cardiovascular, skin conductivity and brain activity respectively, reported pre-post intervention beneficial effects. All five studies that measured anxiety, all three studies that measured mood, and all four studies that measured stress, found no significant differences between VRn and flat-screen images of nature. Caution is required drawing conclusions due to studies' quality and sample sizes. That said, the review suggests that nature replicated in VR shows promise for benefits to mental health and wellbeing in higher education students.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

虚拟现实对高等教育学生心理健康和幸福感影响的系统文献综述和荟萃分析
虚拟现实自然(VRn)可以提供心理健康和福祉,而无需在真实的自然环境中外出。本系统综述和荟萃分析的主要目的是报告VRn对高等教育学生心理健康和福祉的影响。为符合条件,参与者为高等教育学生,干预措施为VRn,结果变量为心理健康参数,研究设计为实验性。信息来源:OVID (Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO), SCOPUS, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, PubMed和GreenFILE。搜索于2023年5月进行,并于2024年11月重新进行。随机和非随机研究的改良Downs和Black检查表用于评估偏倚风险。为了综合结果,首先将数据提取到Microsoft Excel电子表格中,并以叙述、统计和表格格式进行总结。共纳入24篇文章。2项研究质量“好”,18项研究质量“一般”,4项研究质量“差”。总样本量为1419。两项研究比较了VRn与真实自然,6项VRn与无干预,7项VRn与平板电视。12项研究将森林作为唯一的自然环境。17项研究中有13项、8项研究中有7项、5项研究中有4项和7项研究中有4项分别报告了干预前后对自我报告的情绪、焦虑、压力和认知的有益影响。13项研究中的9项、10项研究中的6项和全部5项分别测量了心血管、皮肤电导率和大脑活动的研究都报告了干预前后的有益效果。所有测量焦虑的五项研究,所有测量情绪的三项研究,以及所有测量压力的四项研究,都发现VRn和自然平面图像之间没有显著差异。由于研究的质量和样本量,得出结论需要谨慎。也就是说,该综述表明,在VR中复制的自然显示出对高等教育学生的心理健康和福祉有益的前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being is a triannual peer-reviewed academic journal published by Wiley-Blackwell on behalf of the International Association of Applied Psychology. It was established in 2009 and covers applied psychology topics such as clinical psychology, counseling, cross-cultural psychology, and environmental psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信