Investment decision model for CO2 utilization projects: An empirical study on CO2 mineralization curing

IF 11 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Yi-Zhuo Ji , Jia-Ning Kang , Lan-Cui Liu , Xiao-Xi Tian , Yun-Long Zhang , Yi-Ming Wei
{"title":"Investment decision model for CO2 utilization projects: An empirical study on CO2 mineralization curing","authors":"Yi-Zhuo Ji ,&nbsp;Jia-Ning Kang ,&nbsp;Lan-Cui Liu ,&nbsp;Xiao-Xi Tian ,&nbsp;Yun-Long Zhang ,&nbsp;Yi-Ming Wei","doi":"10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The investment decision of CO<sub>2</sub> utilization projects faces complexity arising from sunk costs, return uncertainty, timing flexibility, and divergent sub-technology learning rates. Existing research largely focuses on single-dimensional uncertainty analysis, which fails to adequately address the combined effects of technological, carbon price, and market uncertainties, leading to potentially inaccurate investment valuations. To address this limitation, this study proposes an integrated analytic framework that integrates a component-based technological learning model with a trinomial tree model and Geometric Brownian Motion, which can simultaneously capture the dynamics of carbon and product prices, and account for heterogeneous learning rates across key technological components, and determine the optimal project investment timing under uncertainty. Applying this framework to a carbonation-cured concrete case study reveals an optimal investment window before 2040, empirical results show that under a high learning scenario,.the operational cost of emerging components decreases by up to 46.2 %, higher than that of other mature components. CCU product price volatility increases the critical carbon price, while a positive drift rate significantly reduces the investment threshold, though its impact diminishes beyond a drift rate of 0.05. Ultimately, the real options model generates a valuation premium of up to ¥6.1 billion compared to the static NPV, validating the value of deferred flexibility. Investment timing analysis reveals a delay of 3–4 years under volatility and exhibits a non-monotonic shift with increasing drift. This method provides quantitative guidance for low-carbon technology investment under uncertainty.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":246,"journal":{"name":"Applied Energy","volume":"401 ","pages":"Article 126699"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925014291","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The investment decision of CO2 utilization projects faces complexity arising from sunk costs, return uncertainty, timing flexibility, and divergent sub-technology learning rates. Existing research largely focuses on single-dimensional uncertainty analysis, which fails to adequately address the combined effects of technological, carbon price, and market uncertainties, leading to potentially inaccurate investment valuations. To address this limitation, this study proposes an integrated analytic framework that integrates a component-based technological learning model with a trinomial tree model and Geometric Brownian Motion, which can simultaneously capture the dynamics of carbon and product prices, and account for heterogeneous learning rates across key technological components, and determine the optimal project investment timing under uncertainty. Applying this framework to a carbonation-cured concrete case study reveals an optimal investment window before 2040, empirical results show that under a high learning scenario,.the operational cost of emerging components decreases by up to 46.2 %, higher than that of other mature components. CCU product price volatility increases the critical carbon price, while a positive drift rate significantly reduces the investment threshold, though its impact diminishes beyond a drift rate of 0.05. Ultimately, the real options model generates a valuation premium of up to ¥6.1 billion compared to the static NPV, validating the value of deferred flexibility. Investment timing analysis reveals a delay of 3–4 years under volatility and exhibits a non-monotonic shift with increasing drift. This method provides quantitative guidance for low-carbon technology investment under uncertainty.
CO2利用项目投资决策模型:基于CO2矿化固化的实证研究
二氧化碳利用项目的投资决策面临沉没成本、回报不确定性、时间灵活性和子技术学习率差异等因素的复杂性。现有的研究主要集中在单一维度的不确定性分析,未能充分解决技术、碳价格和市场不确定性的综合影响,导致潜在的不准确的投资估值。为了解决这一问题,本研究提出了一个集成的分析框架,该框架将基于组件的技术学习模型与三叉树模型和几何布朗运动相结合,可以同时捕捉碳和产品价格的动态,并考虑关键技术组件的异质学习率,并确定不确定情况下的最优项目投资时机。将该框架应用于碳化固化混凝土案例研究,揭示了2040年之前的最佳投资窗口,实证结果表明,在高学习情景下,。新兴组件的运营成本降幅高达46.2%,高于其他成熟组件。CCU产品价格波动增加了临界碳价格,正漂移率显著降低了投资门槛,但其影响在漂移率大于0.05时减弱。最终,与静态NPV相比,实物期权模型产生了高达61亿日元的估值溢价,验证了递延灵活性的价值。投资时机分析显示,波动条件下的投资时滞为3-4年,且随漂移增加呈现非单调漂移。该方法为不确定条件下的低碳技术投资提供了定量指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Energy
Applied Energy 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
10.70%
发文量
1830
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Applied Energy serves as a platform for sharing innovations, research, development, and demonstrations in energy conversion, conservation, and sustainable energy systems. The journal covers topics such as optimal energy resource use, environmental pollutant mitigation, and energy process analysis. It welcomes original papers, review articles, technical notes, and letters to the editor. Authors are encouraged to submit manuscripts that bridge the gap between research, development, and implementation. The journal addresses a wide spectrum of topics, including fossil and renewable energy technologies, energy economics, and environmental impacts. Applied Energy also explores modeling and forecasting, conservation strategies, and the social and economic implications of energy policies, including climate change mitigation. It is complemented by the open-access journal Advances in Applied Energy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信