Yi-Zhuo Ji , Jia-Ning Kang , Lan-Cui Liu , Xiao-Xi Tian , Yun-Long Zhang , Yi-Ming Wei
{"title":"Investment decision model for CO2 utilization projects: An empirical study on CO2 mineralization curing","authors":"Yi-Zhuo Ji , Jia-Ning Kang , Lan-Cui Liu , Xiao-Xi Tian , Yun-Long Zhang , Yi-Ming Wei","doi":"10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The investment decision of CO<sub>2</sub> utilization projects faces complexity arising from sunk costs, return uncertainty, timing flexibility, and divergent sub-technology learning rates. Existing research largely focuses on single-dimensional uncertainty analysis, which fails to adequately address the combined effects of technological, carbon price, and market uncertainties, leading to potentially inaccurate investment valuations. To address this limitation, this study proposes an integrated analytic framework that integrates a component-based technological learning model with a trinomial tree model and Geometric Brownian Motion, which can simultaneously capture the dynamics of carbon and product prices, and account for heterogeneous learning rates across key technological components, and determine the optimal project investment timing under uncertainty. Applying this framework to a carbonation-cured concrete case study reveals an optimal investment window before 2040, empirical results show that under a high learning scenario,.the operational cost of emerging components decreases by up to 46.2 %, higher than that of other mature components. CCU product price volatility increases the critical carbon price, while a positive drift rate significantly reduces the investment threshold, though its impact diminishes beyond a drift rate of 0.05. Ultimately, the real options model generates a valuation premium of up to ¥6.1 billion compared to the static NPV, validating the value of deferred flexibility. Investment timing analysis reveals a delay of 3–4 years under volatility and exhibits a non-monotonic shift with increasing drift. This method provides quantitative guidance for low-carbon technology investment under uncertainty.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":246,"journal":{"name":"Applied Energy","volume":"401 ","pages":"Article 126699"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925014291","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The investment decision of CO2 utilization projects faces complexity arising from sunk costs, return uncertainty, timing flexibility, and divergent sub-technology learning rates. Existing research largely focuses on single-dimensional uncertainty analysis, which fails to adequately address the combined effects of technological, carbon price, and market uncertainties, leading to potentially inaccurate investment valuations. To address this limitation, this study proposes an integrated analytic framework that integrates a component-based technological learning model with a trinomial tree model and Geometric Brownian Motion, which can simultaneously capture the dynamics of carbon and product prices, and account for heterogeneous learning rates across key technological components, and determine the optimal project investment timing under uncertainty. Applying this framework to a carbonation-cured concrete case study reveals an optimal investment window before 2040, empirical results show that under a high learning scenario,.the operational cost of emerging components decreases by up to 46.2 %, higher than that of other mature components. CCU product price volatility increases the critical carbon price, while a positive drift rate significantly reduces the investment threshold, though its impact diminishes beyond a drift rate of 0.05. Ultimately, the real options model generates a valuation premium of up to ¥6.1 billion compared to the static NPV, validating the value of deferred flexibility. Investment timing analysis reveals a delay of 3–4 years under volatility and exhibits a non-monotonic shift with increasing drift. This method provides quantitative guidance for low-carbon technology investment under uncertainty.
期刊介绍:
Applied Energy serves as a platform for sharing innovations, research, development, and demonstrations in energy conversion, conservation, and sustainable energy systems. The journal covers topics such as optimal energy resource use, environmental pollutant mitigation, and energy process analysis. It welcomes original papers, review articles, technical notes, and letters to the editor. Authors are encouraged to submit manuscripts that bridge the gap between research, development, and implementation. The journal addresses a wide spectrum of topics, including fossil and renewable energy technologies, energy economics, and environmental impacts. Applied Energy also explores modeling and forecasting, conservation strategies, and the social and economic implications of energy policies, including climate change mitigation. It is complemented by the open-access journal Advances in Applied Energy.