Ready for road pricing reform? Identifying segments of support in Australia and uncovering (Hidden) attitudes

IF 6.8 1区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Matthew J. Beck, Michiel C.J. Bliemer, James Bushell
{"title":"Ready for road pricing reform? Identifying segments of support in Australia and uncovering (Hidden) attitudes","authors":"Matthew J. Beck,&nbsp;Michiel C.J. Bliemer,&nbsp;James Bushell","doi":"10.1016/j.tra.2025.104646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite decades of research and broad consensus in the academic literature regarding its efficiency, road pricing reform remains a controversial topic that many policymakers are loath to debate, and the public strongly resists. Nevertheless, as traditional sources of road funding decline and the costs of maintaining road infrastructure continue to rise, some form of reform will be necessary. Using a mixed-methods approach, this paper revisits the foundations of the debate and presents an in-depth analysis of public attitudes towards the need for road funding reform, specifically examining the acceptability of a simple road user charge (cents per kilometre), independent of specific pricing levels or policy design features. We segment respondents into five distinct clusters based on their underlying support for, or resistance to, reform, and further contextualise these segments by exploring their perceptions of a road user charge. Overall, we identify that the time to discuss reform is now, as there is growing recognition that funding change will be required. We provide recommendations on how to navigate these initial discussions, particularly as our analysis reveals potentially hidden ulterior motivations that may ultimately shape how reform proposals are received and, in turn, their viability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49421,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","volume":"200 ","pages":"Article 104646"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425002745","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite decades of research and broad consensus in the academic literature regarding its efficiency, road pricing reform remains a controversial topic that many policymakers are loath to debate, and the public strongly resists. Nevertheless, as traditional sources of road funding decline and the costs of maintaining road infrastructure continue to rise, some form of reform will be necessary. Using a mixed-methods approach, this paper revisits the foundations of the debate and presents an in-depth analysis of public attitudes towards the need for road funding reform, specifically examining the acceptability of a simple road user charge (cents per kilometre), independent of specific pricing levels or policy design features. We segment respondents into five distinct clusters based on their underlying support for, or resistance to, reform, and further contextualise these segments by exploring their perceptions of a road user charge. Overall, we identify that the time to discuss reform is now, as there is growing recognition that funding change will be required. We provide recommendations on how to navigate these initial discussions, particularly as our analysis reveals potentially hidden ulterior motivations that may ultimately shape how reform proposals are received and, in turn, their viability.
准备好道路收费改革了吗?识别澳大利亚的支持阶层,揭示(隐藏的)态度
尽管数十年的研究和学术文献对其效率的广泛共识,道路收费改革仍然是一个有争议的话题,许多政策制定者不愿辩论,公众强烈反对。然而,由于道路资金的传统来源减少,而维持道路基础设施的费用继续上升,必须进行某种形式的改革。本文采用混合方法,重新审视了辩论的基础,并深入分析了公众对道路资金改革需求的态度,特别是研究了独立于具体定价水平或政策设计特征的简单道路使用者收费(每公里美分)的可接受性。我们根据受访者对改革的潜在支持或抵制,将他们分为五个不同的群体,并通过探索他们对道路使用者收费的看法,进一步将这些群体置于背景下。总的来说,我们认为现在是讨论改革的时候了,因为人们越来越认识到需要改变资金来源。我们就如何引导这些初步讨论提供了建议,特别是我们的分析揭示了可能隐藏的别有用心的动机,这些动机可能最终影响改革建议的接受方式,进而影响其可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
7.80%
发文量
257
审稿时长
9.8 months
期刊介绍: Transportation Research: Part A contains papers of general interest in all passenger and freight transportation modes: policy analysis, formulation and evaluation; planning; interaction with the political, socioeconomic and physical environment; design, management and evaluation of transportation systems. Topics are approached from any discipline or perspective: economics, engineering, sociology, psychology, etc. Case studies, survey and expository papers are included, as are articles which contribute to unification of the field, or to an understanding of the comparative aspects of different systems. Papers which assess the scope for technological innovation within a social or political framework are also published. The journal is international, and places equal emphasis on the problems of industrialized and non-industrialized regions. Part A''s aims and scope are complementary to Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies and Part D: Transport and Environment. Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. The complete set forms the most cohesive and comprehensive reference of current research in transportation science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信