Estimating groundwater recharge and water balance dynamics in the Akaki catchment of the tropical environment

IF 5.6 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Getamesay Nigussie , Mekuria Argaw , Dessie Nedaw , Tsegaye Tadesse , Andreas Hartmann
{"title":"Estimating groundwater recharge and water balance dynamics in the Akaki catchment of the tropical environment","authors":"Getamesay Nigussie ,&nbsp;Mekuria Argaw ,&nbsp;Dessie Nedaw ,&nbsp;Tsegaye Tadesse ,&nbsp;Andreas Hartmann","doi":"10.1016/j.indic.2025.100807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Groundwater recharge and water balance estimation in the Akaki catchment of the Upper Awash Basin, central Ethiopia, is challenging due to hydrological variability and modeling uncertainties. This study quantified groundwater recharge and other water balance components in the Akaki catchment and its sub-catchments—Legedadi and Gefersa—using the WetSpass-M model. Input data included rainfall, temperature, wind speed, and two types of potential evapotranspiration (PET): FAO-Penman-Monteith and GLEAM, used interchangeably. Spatial layers such as land use/land cover (LULC), soil type, slope, and groundwater depth were derived from Landsat 8, ISDASoil, ALOS DEM, and well observations. Streamflow data were used for model calibration, validation, and performance evaluation. Groundwater recharge in Akaki was estimated at 248 mm using FAO-Penman-Monteith PET, and slightly increased to 256 mm with GLEAM. In Legedadi, recharge rose from 244 mm to 262 mm, while in Gefersa it declined from 323 mm to 307 mm. Akaki's water balance components under FAO-Penman-Monteith were 43 % actual evapotranspiration (AET), 36 % runoff, and 21 % recharge. GLEAM PET reduced AET and increased recharge in Akaki and Legedadi, but increased AET and reduced recharge in Gefersa. These adjustments lowered the water balance error in Akaki (−0.72) and Legedadi (−1.62), but slightly increased it in Gefersa (−1.72). Model performance was strong in Akaki (NSE 0.94, R<sup>2</sup> 0.95, KGE 0.95), moderate in Legedadi (NSE 0.84, KGE 0.70), and good in Gefersa (NSE 0.93, R<sup>2</sup> 0.90, KGE 0.86). However, dry-season discharge and baseflow mismatches indicate the need for improved PET estimation, higher-resolution data, and refined calibration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36171,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 100807"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665972725002284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Groundwater recharge and water balance estimation in the Akaki catchment of the Upper Awash Basin, central Ethiopia, is challenging due to hydrological variability and modeling uncertainties. This study quantified groundwater recharge and other water balance components in the Akaki catchment and its sub-catchments—Legedadi and Gefersa—using the WetSpass-M model. Input data included rainfall, temperature, wind speed, and two types of potential evapotranspiration (PET): FAO-Penman-Monteith and GLEAM, used interchangeably. Spatial layers such as land use/land cover (LULC), soil type, slope, and groundwater depth were derived from Landsat 8, ISDASoil, ALOS DEM, and well observations. Streamflow data were used for model calibration, validation, and performance evaluation. Groundwater recharge in Akaki was estimated at 248 mm using FAO-Penman-Monteith PET, and slightly increased to 256 mm with GLEAM. In Legedadi, recharge rose from 244 mm to 262 mm, while in Gefersa it declined from 323 mm to 307 mm. Akaki's water balance components under FAO-Penman-Monteith were 43 % actual evapotranspiration (AET), 36 % runoff, and 21 % recharge. GLEAM PET reduced AET and increased recharge in Akaki and Legedadi, but increased AET and reduced recharge in Gefersa. These adjustments lowered the water balance error in Akaki (−0.72) and Legedadi (−1.62), but slightly increased it in Gefersa (−1.72). Model performance was strong in Akaki (NSE 0.94, R2 0.95, KGE 0.95), moderate in Legedadi (NSE 0.84, KGE 0.70), and good in Gefersa (NSE 0.93, R2 0.90, KGE 0.86). However, dry-season discharge and baseflow mismatches indicate the need for improved PET estimation, higher-resolution data, and refined calibration.
热带环境下赤木流域地下水补给和水平衡动态的估算
由于水文变化和建模的不确定性,埃塞俄比亚中部上阿瓦什盆地Akaki集水区的地下水补给和水平衡估算具有挑战性。本研究使用WetSpass-M模型量化了Akaki流域及其子流域leggedadi和gefersa的地下水补给和其他水平衡成分。输入数据包括降雨量、温度、风速和两种可互换使用的潜在蒸散量(PET): FAO-Penman-Monteith和GLEAM。土地利用/土地覆盖(LULC)、土壤类型、坡度和地下水深度等空间层数据来自Landsat 8、ISDASoil、ALOS DEM和油井观测。溪流流量数据用于模型校准、验证和性能评估。使用FAO-Penman-Monteith PET估计Akaki地下水补给为248毫米,使用GLEAM略微增加到256毫米。在Legedadi,补给从244毫米上升到262毫米,而在Gefersa,补给从323毫米下降到307毫米。在FAO-Penman-Monteith模式下,赤木的水分平衡成分为43%的实际蒸散发(AET)、36%的径流和21%的补给。GLEAM PET降低了Akaki和Legedadi的AET,增加了补给量,但增加了Gefersa的AET,减少了补给量。这些调整降低了Akaki(- 0.72)和Legedadi(- 1.62)的水分平衡误差,但略微增加了Gefersa(- 1.72)的水分平衡误差。赤木的模型表现较好(NSE 0.94, R2 0.95, KGE 0.95),莱格达迪的模型表现一般(NSE 0.84, KGE 0.70),吉弗萨的模型表现较好(NSE 0.93, R2 0.90, KGE 0.86)。然而,干季流量和基流不匹配表明需要改进PET估计、更高分辨率的数据和更精细的校准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.30%
发文量
49
审稿时长
57 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信