Intersectional research on dementia care for post-migrants and ethnic minority groups: a scoping review.

Frontiers in dementia Pub Date : 2025-08-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frdem.2025.1596395
Kübra Altinok, Seda Güney, Bugse Yüceer, Oliver Razum, Martina Roes
{"title":"Intersectional research on dementia care for post-migrants and ethnic minority groups: a scoping review.","authors":"Kübra Altinok, Seda Güney, Bugse Yüceer, Oliver Razum, Martina Roes","doi":"10.3389/frdem.2025.1596395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this scoping review is to identify the range, extent and nature of evidence available in peer-reviewed and gray literature and to examine how the intersecting experiences and differences of post-migrants and ethnic minority groups influence preferences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Arksey and O'Malley methodological framework and the PRISMA-ScR for Scoping Reviews confirm the rigor of the scoping review. We systematically searched across electronic databases including PubMed, MEDLINE via Ovid, CINAHL, Scopus, Cochrane Library as well as gray literature between December 2023 and September 2024. We included the articles in English, German, and Turkish languages without any publication date restrictions. We analyzed the identified intersectional determinants of preferences using inductive content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Limited studies focusing on the intersectional determinants of preferences of ethnic minority groups or post-migrants with dementia were found. After screening 1,404 studies, we identified 4 relevant papers through the search strategy. Additionally, we identified 18 records through hand-searching, gray literature, and reference list checks. In total, 22 articles were included in this review. Inductive content analysis allowed to reach six main-theme focusing on the preferences, which are preferences connected to informal care providers, expectations in nursing homes/care institutions, preferences of care setting, coping approaches and preferences, food preferences, and other daily preferences.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our findings highlight the complexity of personal care preferences, showing that expectations and practices are shaped by cultural values, traditions, language barriers, immigration processes, shifting socioeconomic positions, and gender roles. The lack of attention to the preferences of the diverse groups and the limited support for their unique wishes and needs indicates a significant challenge in the health system. Caregiving choices and daily living are shaped by intersecting structural determinants and differences. However, there are still gaps in research, healthcare practices, and public awareness, making it harder to meet their preferences.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>Registration DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/Z8T9H.</p>","PeriodicalId":520000,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in dementia","volume":"4 ","pages":"1596395"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12399571/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in dementia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frdem.2025.1596395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this scoping review is to identify the range, extent and nature of evidence available in peer-reviewed and gray literature and to examine how the intersecting experiences and differences of post-migrants and ethnic minority groups influence preferences.

Methods: The Arksey and O'Malley methodological framework and the PRISMA-ScR for Scoping Reviews confirm the rigor of the scoping review. We systematically searched across electronic databases including PubMed, MEDLINE via Ovid, CINAHL, Scopus, Cochrane Library as well as gray literature between December 2023 and September 2024. We included the articles in English, German, and Turkish languages without any publication date restrictions. We analyzed the identified intersectional determinants of preferences using inductive content analysis.

Results: Limited studies focusing on the intersectional determinants of preferences of ethnic minority groups or post-migrants with dementia were found. After screening 1,404 studies, we identified 4 relevant papers through the search strategy. Additionally, we identified 18 records through hand-searching, gray literature, and reference list checks. In total, 22 articles were included in this review. Inductive content analysis allowed to reach six main-theme focusing on the preferences, which are preferences connected to informal care providers, expectations in nursing homes/care institutions, preferences of care setting, coping approaches and preferences, food preferences, and other daily preferences.

Discussion: Our findings highlight the complexity of personal care preferences, showing that expectations and practices are shaped by cultural values, traditions, language barriers, immigration processes, shifting socioeconomic positions, and gender roles. The lack of attention to the preferences of the diverse groups and the limited support for their unique wishes and needs indicates a significant challenge in the health system. Caregiving choices and daily living are shaped by intersecting structural determinants and differences. However, there are still gaps in research, healthcare practices, and public awareness, making it harder to meet their preferences.

Systematic review registration: Registration DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/Z8T9H.

Abstract Image

移民后和少数民族痴呆护理的交叉研究:范围综述。
目的:本范围审查的目的是确定同行评议文献和灰色文献中现有证据的范围、程度和性质,并研究移民后和少数民族群体的交叉经历和差异如何影响偏好。方法:Arksey和O'Malley方法学框架和PRISMA-ScR范围评价确认了范围评价的严谨性。我们通过Ovid、CINAHL、Scopus、Cochrane Library对PubMed、MEDLINE等电子数据库以及2023年12月至2024年9月间的灰色文献进行了系统检索。我们收录了英语、德语和土耳其语的文章,没有任何出版日期限制。我们使用归纳内容分析分析了确定的偏好的交叉决定因素。结果:有限的研究集中于少数民族群体或痴呆症后移民偏好的交叉决定因素。在筛选1404项研究后,我们通过搜索策略筛选出4篇相关论文。此外,我们通过手工检索、灰色文献和参考文献表检查确定了18条记录。本综述共纳入22篇文章。归纳内容分析可以得出六个主要的主题,即与非正式护理提供者有关的偏好,对养老院/护理机构的期望,护理环境的偏好,应对方法和偏好,食物偏好和其他日常偏好。讨论:我们的研究结果强调了个人护理偏好的复杂性,表明期望和实践受到文化价值观、传统、语言障碍、移民过程、不断变化的社会经济地位和性别角色的影响。缺乏对不同群体偏好的关注以及对其独特愿望和需求的支持有限,表明卫生系统面临重大挑战。护理选择和日常生活是由交叉的结构决定因素和差异形成的。然而,在研究、医疗实践和公众意识方面仍存在差距,这使得满足他们的偏好变得更加困难。系统评审注册:注册DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/Z8T9H。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信