Endoscopic or Microscopic Discectomy: Which One Do Neurosurgeons Prefer for Their Own Lumbar Disc Surgery?

Hakan Kina, Aydin Sinan Apaydin
{"title":"Endoscopic or Microscopic Discectomy: Which One Do Neurosurgeons Prefer for Their Own Lumbar Disc Surgery?","authors":"Hakan Kina, Aydin Sinan Apaydin","doi":"10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.48513-25.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine the factors influencing neurosurgeons? preferences between microscopic discectomy (MD) and endoscopic discectomy (ED) for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) in Türkiye.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was administered to 229 active neurosurgeons in Türkiye. The 23-item questionnaire assessed various factors influencing the preference for ED or MD, including training, surgical experience, demographic characteristics, and institutional factors. Data analysis was performed via ANOVA, multivariate logistic regression, chi-square tests, t tests, and descriptive statistics. A thematic analysis was conducted on the open-ended responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results revealed that while traditional MD remained the preferred technique among older and more experienced neurosurgeons, 62.9% of surgeons with endoscopic training favored ED. Surgical preferences are significantly influenced by handson experience and institutional support for endoscopic procedures. Although younger surgeons preferred ED, MD was favored in complex and emergency situations (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Younger surgeons increasingly opt for ED because of their familiarity with minimally invasive techniques, although MD remains the predominant approach among more experienced surgeons. Surgical decisions are heavily influenced by institutional support and practical experience. Continuous education and support for endoscopic methods will be essential for enhancing patient outcomes and integrating new technologies into clinical practice as surgical practices evolve.</p>","PeriodicalId":94381,"journal":{"name":"Turkish neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"721-726"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.48513-25.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To examine the factors influencing neurosurgeons? preferences between microscopic discectomy (MD) and endoscopic discectomy (ED) for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) in Türkiye.

Material and methods: A cross-sectional survey was administered to 229 active neurosurgeons in Türkiye. The 23-item questionnaire assessed various factors influencing the preference for ED or MD, including training, surgical experience, demographic characteristics, and institutional factors. Data analysis was performed via ANOVA, multivariate logistic regression, chi-square tests, t tests, and descriptive statistics. A thematic analysis was conducted on the open-ended responses.

Results: The results revealed that while traditional MD remained the preferred technique among older and more experienced neurosurgeons, 62.9% of surgeons with endoscopic training favored ED. Surgical preferences are significantly influenced by handson experience and institutional support for endoscopic procedures. Although younger surgeons preferred ED, MD was favored in complex and emergency situations (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Younger surgeons increasingly opt for ED because of their familiarity with minimally invasive techniques, although MD remains the predominant approach among more experienced surgeons. Surgical decisions are heavily influenced by institutional support and practical experience. Continuous education and support for endoscopic methods will be essential for enhancing patient outcomes and integrating new technologies into clinical practice as surgical practices evolve.

内窥镜或显微椎间盘切除术:神经外科医生更倾向于哪种腰椎间盘切除术?
目的:本研究探讨影响土耳其神经外科医生选择显微椎间盘切除术(MD)和内镜椎间盘切除术(ED)治疗腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)的因素。主要目的是了解人口统计学特征、专业经验和机构支持如何影响神经外科医生的手术决策过程。材料和方法:对土耳其229名现役神经外科医生进行横断面调查。问卷共23项,评估了影响ED或MD偏好的各种因素,包括培训、手术经验、人口统计学特征和体制因素。数据分析采用方差分析、多元logistic回归、卡方检验、t检验和描述性统计。对不限成员名额的答复进行了专题分析。结果:结果显示,虽然传统MD仍然是年龄较大和经验丰富的神经外科医生的首选技术,但62.9%接受过内窥镜培训的外科医生更喜欢ED。手术偏好受内窥镜手术的实践经验和机构支持的显著影响。尽管年轻外科医生更倾向于ED,但在复杂和紧急情况下,MD更受青睐(p < 0.05)。结论:年轻的外科医生越来越多地选择ED,因为他们熟悉微创技术,尽管MD仍然是更有经验的外科医生的主要方法。手术决定在很大程度上受机构支持和实际经验的影响。随着手术实践的发展,对内窥镜方法的持续教育和支持对于提高患者的治疗效果和将新技术整合到临床实践中至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信