Effect of radical radiotherapy dose on the prognosis of limited-stage thoracic small cell carcinoma of the esophagus: A multicenter retrospective trial from China (CHiSCEC).

IF 1.3
Zhanyuan Li, Qi Zhang, Qifeng Wang, Yaowen Zhang, Yi Wang, Wenbin Shen, Wencheng Zhang, Xiaolin Ge, Xiujun Su, Ning Yang, Lei Li, Jie Ma, Lina Zhao, Bingxu Tan, Wei Dong, Jian Zhang, Daqing Sun, Hongfu Sun, Wei Huang
{"title":"Effect of radical radiotherapy dose on the prognosis of limited-stage thoracic small cell carcinoma of the esophagus: A multicenter retrospective trial from China (CHiSCEC).","authors":"Zhanyuan Li, Qi Zhang, Qifeng Wang, Yaowen Zhang, Yi Wang, Wenbin Shen, Wencheng Zhang, Xiaolin Ge, Xiujun Su, Ning Yang, Lei Li, Jie Ma, Lina Zhao, Bingxu Tan, Wei Dong, Jian Zhang, Daqing Sun, Hongfu Sun, Wei Huang","doi":"10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_425_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal radiation dose for the treatment of small cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SCEC) has not been established. This study aimed to investigate the treatment outcomes and toxicities in patients with limited-stage SCEC (LS-SCEC) treated by radiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with LS-SCEC from 14 institutions were retrospectively identified between December 2000 and October 2021. The primary endpoints of the study included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and local regional control (LRC), and the secondary endpoints were treatment-related toxicity parameters. Patients were categorized into a high-dose (HD, ≥ 60 Gy) group and low-dose (LD, <60 Gy) group based on the radiation dose. Additionally, they were classified into two groups based on the treatment sequence: concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and sequential chemoradiotherapy (SCRT). A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) approach was applied to balance the observable potential confounding factors between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 150 patients included in the study, 56 received LD, and 94 received HD radiotherapy. After 1:1 PSM, the OS, PFS, and LRC in the HD group were higher than those in the LD group; however, the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). No significant differences in survival and the occurrence of treatment-related toxicity were observed between the CCRT and SCRT groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Neither CCRT nor SCRT was significantly associated with longer survival in LS-SCEC when a higher radiation dose was selected. A lower radiation dose might be a preferable time-dose fraction scheme; however, additional studies are required to validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":94070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics","volume":"21 4","pages":"864-874"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_425_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The optimal radiation dose for the treatment of small cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SCEC) has not been established. This study aimed to investigate the treatment outcomes and toxicities in patients with limited-stage SCEC (LS-SCEC) treated by radiotherapy.

Methods: Patients with LS-SCEC from 14 institutions were retrospectively identified between December 2000 and October 2021. The primary endpoints of the study included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and local regional control (LRC), and the secondary endpoints were treatment-related toxicity parameters. Patients were categorized into a high-dose (HD, ≥ 60 Gy) group and low-dose (LD, <60 Gy) group based on the radiation dose. Additionally, they were classified into two groups based on the treatment sequence: concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and sequential chemoradiotherapy (SCRT). A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) approach was applied to balance the observable potential confounding factors between the groups.

Results: Of the 150 patients included in the study, 56 received LD, and 94 received HD radiotherapy. After 1:1 PSM, the OS, PFS, and LRC in the HD group were higher than those in the LD group; however, the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). No significant differences in survival and the occurrence of treatment-related toxicity were observed between the CCRT and SCRT groups.

Conclusions: Neither CCRT nor SCRT was significantly associated with longer survival in LS-SCEC when a higher radiation dose was selected. A lower radiation dose might be a preferable time-dose fraction scheme; however, additional studies are required to validate these findings.

放射治疗剂量对有限期胸小细胞癌预后的影响:一项来自中国的多中心回顾性试验(CHiSCEC)。
背景:治疗食管小细胞癌(SCEC)的最佳放射剂量尚未确定。本研究旨在探讨有限期SCEC (LS-SCEC)患者接受放疗的治疗结果和毒性。方法:回顾性分析2000年12月至2021年10月期间来自14家机构的LS-SCEC患者。该研究的主要终点包括总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)和局部区域控制(LRC),次要终点是治疗相关的毒性参数。将患者分为高剂量组(HD,≥60 Gy)和低剂量组(LD)。结果:纳入研究的150例患者中,56例接受了LD放疗,94例接受了HD放疗。1:1 PSM后,HD组的OS、PFS、LRC均高于LD组;但差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。CCRT组和SCRT组在生存和治疗相关毒性的发生方面没有观察到显著差异。结论:当选择较高的放射剂量时,CCRT和SCRT均与LS-SCEC的较长生存期无显著相关。较低的辐射剂量可能是较好的时间-剂量分数方案;然而,需要更多的研究来验证这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信