Development of an evaluation index system for intelligent minimally invasive tumor ablation based on telemedicine.

IF 1.3
Wuwei Yang, Baorang Zhu, Jing Li, Junxiao Wang, Weijun Fan, Chen Chi, Yumeng Zhang, Fuliang Luo, Zengliang Liu
{"title":"Development of an evaluation index system for intelligent minimally invasive tumor ablation based on telemedicine.","authors":"Wuwei Yang, Baorang Zhu, Jing Li, Junxiao Wang, Weijun Fan, Chen Chi, Yumeng Zhang, Fuliang Luo, Zengliang Liu","doi":"10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_727_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to establish an evaluation index system for intelligent minimally invasive tumor ablation based on telemedicine, thereby providing theoretical support for the assessment, application, and promotion of remote intelligent ablation therapies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An expert consultation questionnaire was developed based on a review of the literature. Purposive sampling was performed to select 16 experts specializing in minimally invasive oncology, telemedicine management, and healthcare informatics. Two rounds of Delphi questionnaire surveys were conducted. The index system was finalized through iterative discussions based on expert feedback. The analytical hierarchy process (AHP) was utilized to determine the indicator weights.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both rounds of the questionnaire achieved 100% response rates. The expert authority coefficient reached 0.789, while the Kendall's W coefficients for the two rounds were 0.138 (P < 0.001) and 0.224 (P < 0.001), respectively. The finalized system comprised 6 first-level indicators, 13 second-level indicators, and 45 third-level indicators, establishing a comprehensive management framework for telemedicine-based intelligent tumor ablation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The evaluation system established in this study demonstrated scientific validity and reliability. It identified critical success factors for implementing remote ablation procedures, offering a practical reference for advancing telemedicine-enabled minimally invasive cancer therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":94070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics","volume":"21 4","pages":"941-947"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_727_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to establish an evaluation index system for intelligent minimally invasive tumor ablation based on telemedicine, thereby providing theoretical support for the assessment, application, and promotion of remote intelligent ablation therapies.

Methods: An expert consultation questionnaire was developed based on a review of the literature. Purposive sampling was performed to select 16 experts specializing in minimally invasive oncology, telemedicine management, and healthcare informatics. Two rounds of Delphi questionnaire surveys were conducted. The index system was finalized through iterative discussions based on expert feedback. The analytical hierarchy process (AHP) was utilized to determine the indicator weights.

Results: Both rounds of the questionnaire achieved 100% response rates. The expert authority coefficient reached 0.789, while the Kendall's W coefficients for the two rounds were 0.138 (P < 0.001) and 0.224 (P < 0.001), respectively. The finalized system comprised 6 first-level indicators, 13 second-level indicators, and 45 third-level indicators, establishing a comprehensive management framework for telemedicine-based intelligent tumor ablation.

Conclusion: The evaluation system established in this study demonstrated scientific validity and reliability. It identified critical success factors for implementing remote ablation procedures, offering a practical reference for advancing telemedicine-enabled minimally invasive cancer therapies.

基于远程医疗的智能微创肿瘤消融评价指标体系的建立。
目的:本研究旨在建立基于远程医疗的智能微创肿瘤消融评价指标体系,为远程智能消融疗法的评估、应用和推广提供理论支持。方法:在查阅文献的基础上编制专家咨询问卷。有目的的抽样选择了16位专门从事微创肿瘤学、远程医疗管理和卫生保健信息学的专家。进行了两轮德尔菲问卷调查。在专家反馈的基础上,通过反复讨论最终确定了指标体系。采用层次分析法(AHP)确定指标权重。结果:两轮问卷的回复率均为100%。专家权威系数达到0.789,两轮肯德尔W系数分别为0.138 (P < 0.001)和0.224 (P < 0.001)。最终确定的体系包括6个一级指标、13个二级指标、45个三级指标,建立了基于远程医疗的智能肿瘤消融综合管理框架。结论:本研究建立的评价体系具有科学的效度和信度。它确定了实施远程消融手术的关键成功因素,为推进远程医疗的微创癌症治疗提供了实用参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信