Impact of obesity on palpation-guided distal radial access for coronary procedures: subgroup analysis of the multicenter, prospective KODRA registry.

Ji Woong Roh, Seok-Jae Heo, Oh-Hyun Lee, Eui Im, Deok-Kyu Cho, Jun-Won Lee, Bong-Ki Lee, Sang-Yong Yoo, Sang Yeub Lee, Chan Joon Kim, Han-Young Jin, Jin Sup Park, Jung Ho Heo, Do Hoi Kim, Jin Bae Lee, Dong-Kie Kim, Jun Ho Bae, Sung-Yun Lee, Seung-Hwan Lee, Yongcheol Kim
{"title":"Impact of obesity on palpation-guided distal radial access for coronary procedures: subgroup analysis of the multicenter, prospective KODRA registry.","authors":"Ji Woong Roh, Seok-Jae Heo, Oh-Hyun Lee, Eui Im, Deok-Kyu Cho, Jun-Won Lee, Bong-Ki Lee, Sang-Yong Yoo, Sang Yeub Lee, Chan Joon Kim, Han-Young Jin, Jin Sup Park, Jung Ho Heo, Do Hoi Kim, Jin Bae Lee, Dong-Kie Kim, Jun Ho Bae, Sung-Yun Lee, Seung-Hwan Lee, Yongcheol Kim","doi":"10.5603/cj.106255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is limited data on the impact of body mass index (BMI) on distal radial access (DRA). Using a large-scale prospective registry, the influence of obesity on DRA outcomes was evaluated, including cannulation and complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the prospective, multicenter KODRA (Korean Prospective Registry for Evaluation the Safety and Efficacy of Distal Radial Approach) registry data, 4,638 patients who planned palpation-guided distal radial artery puncture were enrolled into two groups, both with body mass index (BMI) information available: obese (n = 2,205; BMI ≥ 25 kg/m²) and non-obese (n = 2,433). The primary endpoint was the success rate of distal radial artery cannulation. Secondary endpoints included cannulation time, crossover rate, and DRA-related complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 66.6 ± 11.7 years and 67.2% were men. No significant difference existed in the success rate of distal radial artery cannulation between the two groups (94.5% in the obese group vs. 94.3% in the non-obese group, p = 0.787). This tendency in cannulation success rate and cannulation time was consistently observed in multiple sensitivity analyses, including multivariable and propensity score-matched analyses. Crossover rate (6.6% vs. 6.7%, p = 0.962) and DRA-related complications (4.3% vs. 4.6%, p = 0.630) were not significantly different between groups. However, cannulation time was significantly longer in the obese group compared to the non-obese group [105 (64-180) sec vs. 100 (60-155) sec, p = 0.002].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this subgroup analysis of the KODRA trial, obesity was not associated with the success rate for palpation-guided distal radial artery cannulation, crossover rate, and DRA-related complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":93923,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/cj.106255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is limited data on the impact of body mass index (BMI) on distal radial access (DRA). Using a large-scale prospective registry, the influence of obesity on DRA outcomes was evaluated, including cannulation and complications.

Methods: Using data from the prospective, multicenter KODRA (Korean Prospective Registry for Evaluation the Safety and Efficacy of Distal Radial Approach) registry data, 4,638 patients who planned palpation-guided distal radial artery puncture were enrolled into two groups, both with body mass index (BMI) information available: obese (n = 2,205; BMI ≥ 25 kg/m²) and non-obese (n = 2,433). The primary endpoint was the success rate of distal radial artery cannulation. Secondary endpoints included cannulation time, crossover rate, and DRA-related complications.

Results: The mean age was 66.6 ± 11.7 years and 67.2% were men. No significant difference existed in the success rate of distal radial artery cannulation between the two groups (94.5% in the obese group vs. 94.3% in the non-obese group, p = 0.787). This tendency in cannulation success rate and cannulation time was consistently observed in multiple sensitivity analyses, including multivariable and propensity score-matched analyses. Crossover rate (6.6% vs. 6.7%, p = 0.962) and DRA-related complications (4.3% vs. 4.6%, p = 0.630) were not significantly different between groups. However, cannulation time was significantly longer in the obese group compared to the non-obese group [105 (64-180) sec vs. 100 (60-155) sec, p = 0.002].

Conclusions: In this subgroup analysis of the KODRA trial, obesity was not associated with the success rate for palpation-guided distal radial artery cannulation, crossover rate, and DRA-related complications.

肥胖对触诊引导的冠状动脉远端桡动脉通路的影响:多中心前瞻性KODRA登记的亚组分析。
背景:关于身体质量指数(BMI)对桡骨远端通路(DRA)影响的数据有限。采用大规模前瞻性登记,评估肥胖对DRA结果的影响,包括插管和并发症。方法:使用前瞻性、多中心KODRA(韩国前瞻性桡动脉远端入路安全性和有效性评估注册中心)注册数据,将4638名计划进行指诊引导桡动脉远端穿刺的患者分为两组,均有体重指数(BMI)信息:肥胖(n = 2,205; BMI≥25 kg/m²)和非肥胖(n = 2,433)。主要终点为桡动脉远端插管成功率。次要终点包括插管时间、交叉率和dra相关并发症。结果:平均年龄66.6±11.7岁,男性占67.2%。两组桡动脉远端插管成功率差异无统计学意义(肥胖组94.5% vs非肥胖组94.3%,p = 0.787)。这种插管成功率和插管时间的趋势在多重敏感性分析中一致观察到,包括多变量和倾向评分匹配分析。交叉率(6.6% vs. 6.7%, p = 0.962)和dra相关并发症(4.3% vs. 4.6%, p = 0.630)组间差异无统计学意义。然而,肥胖组插管时间明显长于非肥胖组[105(64-180)秒比100(60-155)秒,p = 0.002]。结论:在KODRA试验的亚组分析中,肥胖与触诊引导桡动脉远端插管成功率、交叉率和dra相关并发症无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信