Comparison of Effects of Remimazolam and Midazolam plus Sevoflurane on Intraoperative Hemodynamics and Opioid Administration: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Yukiko Tashiro, Daisuke Hayashi, Dai Namizato, Yuya Ise, Masashi Ishikawa
{"title":"Comparison of Effects of Remimazolam and Midazolam plus Sevoflurane on Intraoperative Hemodynamics and Opioid Administration: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Yukiko Tashiro, Daisuke Hayashi, Dai Namizato, Yuya Ise, Masashi Ishikawa","doi":"10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2025_92-403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Remimazolam is an ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine that maintains stable hemodynamics during anesthesia. However, few reports have focused on hemodynamic stability and opioid use during cardiac surgery with remimazolam. We hypothesized that administration of remimazolam for induction and maintenance of anesthesia for transcatheter aortic valve implantation would maintain hemodynamics as effectively as conventional anesthetics and allow use of an appropriate dose of opioids. We compared intraoperative hemodynamics and opioid use in patients with severe aortic stenosis who received remimazolam or conventional anesthetics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study analyzed data for patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation from October 2022 to September 2023. The 23 patients were divided into two groups: a remimazolam group and midazolam + sevoflurane group. The primary outcome was intraoperative blood pressure. The secondary outcomes were the doses of vasoconstrictors, vasodilators, and opioids used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in any patient characteristic or intraoperative blood pressure between the two groups (before anesthesia: 92.0 [87.0-99.8] vs. 91.0 [86.0-107.0] mm Hg, P=0.935; 1 minute after induction of anesthesia: 91.0 [83.0-98.5] vs. 90.0 [86.3-95.3] mm Hg, P=0.843; at the start of surgery: 77.0 [70.0-79.0] vs. 82.5 [75.5-105.5] mm Hg, P=0.072; at the end of surgery: 74.0 [71.0-78.0] vs. 82.5 [75.5-90.8] mm Hg, P=0.082). The maximum rate of remifentanil administration was significantly higher in the remimazolam group (0.10 [0.10-0.20] vs. 0.10 [0.013-0.10] μg/kg/min, P=0.012).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Remimazolam maintained hemodynamics as effectively as midazolam + sevoflurane, even when used in combination with opioids. Remimazolam thus appears to be noninferior to midazolam + sevoflurane.</p>","PeriodicalId":56076,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nippon Medical School","volume":"92 4","pages":"313-320"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nippon Medical School","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2025_92-403","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Remimazolam is an ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine that maintains stable hemodynamics during anesthesia. However, few reports have focused on hemodynamic stability and opioid use during cardiac surgery with remimazolam. We hypothesized that administration of remimazolam for induction and maintenance of anesthesia for transcatheter aortic valve implantation would maintain hemodynamics as effectively as conventional anesthetics and allow use of an appropriate dose of opioids. We compared intraoperative hemodynamics and opioid use in patients with severe aortic stenosis who received remimazolam or conventional anesthetics.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed data for patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation from October 2022 to September 2023. The 23 patients were divided into two groups: a remimazolam group and midazolam + sevoflurane group. The primary outcome was intraoperative blood pressure. The secondary outcomes were the doses of vasoconstrictors, vasodilators, and opioids used.
Results: There was no significant difference in any patient characteristic or intraoperative blood pressure between the two groups (before anesthesia: 92.0 [87.0-99.8] vs. 91.0 [86.0-107.0] mm Hg, P=0.935; 1 minute after induction of anesthesia: 91.0 [83.0-98.5] vs. 90.0 [86.3-95.3] mm Hg, P=0.843; at the start of surgery: 77.0 [70.0-79.0] vs. 82.5 [75.5-105.5] mm Hg, P=0.072; at the end of surgery: 74.0 [71.0-78.0] vs. 82.5 [75.5-90.8] mm Hg, P=0.082). The maximum rate of remifentanil administration was significantly higher in the remimazolam group (0.10 [0.10-0.20] vs. 0.10 [0.013-0.10] μg/kg/min, P=0.012).
Conclusions: Remimazolam maintained hemodynamics as effectively as midazolam + sevoflurane, even when used in combination with opioids. Remimazolam thus appears to be noninferior to midazolam + sevoflurane.
期刊介绍:
The international effort to understand, treat and control disease involve clinicians and researchers from many medical and biological science disciplines. The Journal of Nippon Medical School (JNMS) is the official journal of the Medical Association of Nippon Medical School and is dedicated to furthering international exchange of medical science experience and opinion. It provides an international forum for researchers in the fields of bascic and clinical medicine to introduce, discuss and exchange thier novel achievements in biomedical science and a platform for the worldwide dissemination and steering of biomedical knowledge for the benefit of human health and welfare. Properly reasoned discussions disciplined by appropriate references to existing bodies of knowledge or aimed at motivating the creation of such knowledge is the aim of the journal.