The evolution of concomitant mitral regurgitation in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a prospective multi-center China-DVD2 cohort study.

Xiao-Han Zhao, Rui-Sheng Zhang, Peng Li, Ying Guo, Xu-Yang Meng, Xiang Wang, You Zhong, Wen-Duo Zhang, Hui Li, Chen-Guang Yang, Yan-Qing Wu, Jian-Fang Luo, Xian-Bao Liu, Fang Wang, Hui-Ping Zhang
{"title":"The evolution of concomitant mitral regurgitation in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a prospective multi-center China-DVD2 cohort study.","authors":"Xiao-Han Zhao, Rui-Sheng Zhang, Peng Li, Ying Guo, Xu-Yang Meng, Xiang Wang, You Zhong, Wen-Duo Zhang, Hui Li, Chen-Guang Yang, Yan-Qing Wu, Jian-Fang Luo, Xian-Bao Liu, Fang Wang, Hui-Ping Zhang","doi":"10.5603/cj.103051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Severe aortic stenosis (AS) often coexists with mitral regurgitation (MR). This study evaluated the significant evolution of MR in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for AS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multi-center China Degenerative Valve Disease II Cohort (China-DVD2) Study enrolled patients undergoing TAVR for AS from January 2020 to October 2023. MR severity was assessed at baseline and 12 months post-TAVR. Composite endpoints included all-cause death, heart failure rehospitalization, myocardial infarction, and angina.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 424 enrolled patients, 130 (31%) had significant MR at baseline. At 12 months, MR improved in 56 (70%) of 80 patients with follow-up, and greater improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)was associated with MR improvement [odds ratios (OR): 0.97, 95% 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.95-1.00, p = 0.04)]. Patients with MR improvement showed significant New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class improvement at 12-month follow-up. No survival benefit disparity was observed between patients with and without significant baseline MR, but a trend toward lower composite endpoint rate (12.5% vs. 20.8%, log-rank p = 0.49) was observed in patients with MR improvement. Older age [hazard ratios (HR): 1.12, 95% CI: 1.01-1.24, p = 0.04)] and higher systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (SPAP) (HR: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.00-1.09, p = 0.04) were linked to worse outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most patients with significant MR experienced improvement of NYHA class and MR post TAVR. Baseline significant MR was not linked to worse outcomes, but MR improvement showed a trend toward better prognosis. Older age and higher SPAP predicted worse outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":93923,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/cj.103051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Severe aortic stenosis (AS) often coexists with mitral regurgitation (MR). This study evaluated the significant evolution of MR in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for AS.

Methods: This multi-center China Degenerative Valve Disease II Cohort (China-DVD2) Study enrolled patients undergoing TAVR for AS from January 2020 to October 2023. MR severity was assessed at baseline and 12 months post-TAVR. Composite endpoints included all-cause death, heart failure rehospitalization, myocardial infarction, and angina.

Results: Among 424 enrolled patients, 130 (31%) had significant MR at baseline. At 12 months, MR improved in 56 (70%) of 80 patients with follow-up, and greater improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)was associated with MR improvement [odds ratios (OR): 0.97, 95% 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.95-1.00, p = 0.04)]. Patients with MR improvement showed significant New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class improvement at 12-month follow-up. No survival benefit disparity was observed between patients with and without significant baseline MR, but a trend toward lower composite endpoint rate (12.5% vs. 20.8%, log-rank p = 0.49) was observed in patients with MR improvement. Older age [hazard ratios (HR): 1.12, 95% CI: 1.01-1.24, p = 0.04)] and higher systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (SPAP) (HR: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.00-1.09, p = 0.04) were linked to worse outcomes.

Conclusions: Most patients with significant MR experienced improvement of NYHA class and MR post TAVR. Baseline significant MR was not linked to worse outcomes, but MR improvement showed a trend toward better prognosis. Older age and higher SPAP predicted worse outcomes.

重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术并发二尖瓣反流的演变:一项前瞻性多中心中国- dvd2队列研究
背景:严重主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)常与二尖瓣反流(MR)共存。本研究评估了接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)治疗AS患者MR的显著变化。方法:这项多中心中国退行性瓣膜病II队列(China- dvd2)研究纳入了2020年1月至2023年10月接受TAVR治疗的AS患者。在基线和tavr后12个月评估MR严重程度。复合终点包括全因死亡、心力衰竭再住院、心肌梗死和心绞痛。结果:在424例入组患者中,130例(31%)在基线时有显著MR。12个月时,80例随访患者中有56例(70%)的MR改善,左心室射血分数(LVEF)的更大改善与MR改善相关[优势比(OR): 0.97, 95% 95%可信区间(CI): 0.95-1.00, p = 0.04]。MR改善的患者在12个月的随访中显示出显著的纽约心脏协会(NYHA)功能分级改善。在有和没有显著基线MR的患者之间没有观察到生存获益差异,但在MR改善的患者中观察到较低的综合终点率(12.5% vs. 20.8%, log-rank p = 0.49)的趋势。年龄较大[危险比(HR): 1.12, 95% CI: 1.01-1.24, p = 0.04)]和较高的肺动脉收缩压(SPAP) (HR: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.00-1.09, p = 0.04)与较差的预后相关。结论:大多数MR显著的患者在TAVR后的NYHA分级和MR均有改善。基线显著的MR与较差的结果无关,但MR的改善显示了更好的预后趋势。年龄越大,SPAP越高,结果越差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信