Fatma Mohamed Elmansy, Mohamed Goda Elbqry, Saddam Ahmed Al-Ahdal, Patience Osose Nasir, Nasiru Mohammed Abdullahi, Azza Elsayed Abd Elfatah Arafat
{"title":"An Analysis of Mental Health, Subjective Well-Being, and Self-Efficacy Among Nurses in the Qassim Health Cluster: Identification of Risk Levels.","authors":"Fatma Mohamed Elmansy, Mohamed Goda Elbqry, Saddam Ahmed Al-Ahdal, Patience Osose Nasir, Nasiru Mohammed Abdullahi, Azza Elsayed Abd Elfatah Arafat","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S540199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Nurses are the cornerstone of the healthcare system, playing a vital role in delivering consistent, high-quality patient care. However, working in high-stress environments such as hospitals and health clusters exposes them to ongoing well-being, emotional, and psychological challenges. If unaddressed, these factors can significantly compromise their mental health, subjective well-being, and self-efficacy, ultimately affecting workforce sustainability and patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the mental health, subjective well-being, and self-efficacy of the nursing workforce within the Qassim Health Cluster and identify individuals or groups at elevated risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional correlational study was conducted with 306 nursing staff, recruited through convenience sampling. Data were collected via a standardized electronic survey administered between January to March 2025 across three hospitals in Buraydah city. The survey included the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF) to assess mental health, the WHO-5 Well-Being Index to measure subjective well-being, and the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE) to evaluate perceived self-efficacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of participants were female, middle-aged, and holding a bachelor's degree and varying levels of work experience. Overall, nurses demonstrated moderate to high levels of mental health (65.26%), self-efficacy (58.64%), and subjective well-being (69.95%). Mean scores were 45.68 (±17.26) for mental health (MHC-SF), 30.98 (±5.70) for self-efficacy (GSE), and 14.66 (±6.17) for well-being (WHO-5). Significant positive correlations were observed among all variables: mental health was strongly correlated with self-efficacy (<i>r</i> = 0.671) and moderately with well-being (<i>r</i> = 0.510); well-being was also moderately correlated with self-efficacy (<i>r</i> = 0.427).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nurses' mental health, self-efficacy, and well-being are interrelated and critically impact the quality of patient care. Healthcare organizations should implement targeted interventions, particularly training and stress management programs to support the psychological and subjective health of nurses, with a focus on less experienced staff.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 ","pages":"2825-2836"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12404253/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S540199","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Nurses are the cornerstone of the healthcare system, playing a vital role in delivering consistent, high-quality patient care. However, working in high-stress environments such as hospitals and health clusters exposes them to ongoing well-being, emotional, and psychological challenges. If unaddressed, these factors can significantly compromise their mental health, subjective well-being, and self-efficacy, ultimately affecting workforce sustainability and patient outcomes.
Aim: To assess the mental health, subjective well-being, and self-efficacy of the nursing workforce within the Qassim Health Cluster and identify individuals or groups at elevated risk.
Methods: A cross-sectional correlational study was conducted with 306 nursing staff, recruited through convenience sampling. Data were collected via a standardized electronic survey administered between January to March 2025 across three hospitals in Buraydah city. The survey included the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF) to assess mental health, the WHO-5 Well-Being Index to measure subjective well-being, and the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE) to evaluate perceived self-efficacy.
Results: The majority of participants were female, middle-aged, and holding a bachelor's degree and varying levels of work experience. Overall, nurses demonstrated moderate to high levels of mental health (65.26%), self-efficacy (58.64%), and subjective well-being (69.95%). Mean scores were 45.68 (±17.26) for mental health (MHC-SF), 30.98 (±5.70) for self-efficacy (GSE), and 14.66 (±6.17) for well-being (WHO-5). Significant positive correlations were observed among all variables: mental health was strongly correlated with self-efficacy (r = 0.671) and moderately with well-being (r = 0.510); well-being was also moderately correlated with self-efficacy (r = 0.427).
Conclusion: Nurses' mental health, self-efficacy, and well-being are interrelated and critically impact the quality of patient care. Healthcare organizations should implement targeted interventions, particularly training and stress management programs to support the psychological and subjective health of nurses, with a focus on less experienced staff.
期刊介绍:
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include:
Public and community health
Policy and law
Preventative and predictive healthcare
Risk and hazard management
Epidemiology, detection and screening
Lifestyle and diet modification
Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs
Health and safety and occupational health
Healthcare services provision
Health literacy and education
Advertising and promotion of health issues
Health economic evaluations and resource management
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.