Theories of the origin of SARS-CoV-2 in the light of its continuing evolution.

IF 0.6 4区 生物学 Q4 BIOLOGY
Florence Débarre, Zach Hensel
{"title":"Theories of the origin of SARS-CoV-2 in the light of its continuing evolution.","authors":"Florence Débarre, Zach Hensel","doi":"10.5802/crbiol.183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The exact details of the emergence of SARS-CoV-2, the virus causing Covid-19, remain unknown. Scientific publications using data available to date point to a natural origin linked to the wildlife trade at a market in Wuhan, China. Yet, theories postulating a research-related origin of SARS-CoV-2 abound, and currently dominate the public discussion of the origin of the Covid-19 pandemic. Here, we attempt to characterize the diversity of research-related origin scenarios, discuss their characteristics and evidence base, or the lack thereof, and highlight mutual incompatibilities between some scenarios. We then focus on a feature of SARS-CoV-2 that is central in today's leading research-related hypotheses, namely the insertion that led to the introduction of a polybasic cleavage site in the spike glycoprotein. We examine various scenarios put forward to explain this insertion in a research-related context, and we show how SARS-CoV-2's evolution in humans has provided examples demonstrating that such insertions happen naturally.</p>","PeriodicalId":55231,"journal":{"name":"Comptes Rendus Biologies","volume":"348 ","pages":"189-209"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comptes Rendus Biologies","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5802/crbiol.183","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The exact details of the emergence of SARS-CoV-2, the virus causing Covid-19, remain unknown. Scientific publications using data available to date point to a natural origin linked to the wildlife trade at a market in Wuhan, China. Yet, theories postulating a research-related origin of SARS-CoV-2 abound, and currently dominate the public discussion of the origin of the Covid-19 pandemic. Here, we attempt to characterize the diversity of research-related origin scenarios, discuss their characteristics and evidence base, or the lack thereof, and highlight mutual incompatibilities between some scenarios. We then focus on a feature of SARS-CoV-2 that is central in today's leading research-related hypotheses, namely the insertion that led to the introduction of a polybasic cleavage site in the spike glycoprotein. We examine various scenarios put forward to explain this insertion in a research-related context, and we show how SARS-CoV-2's evolution in humans has provided examples demonstrating that such insertions happen naturally.

鉴于SARS-CoV-2的持续演变,关于其起源的理论。
引起Covid-19的病毒SARS-CoV-2出现的确切细节仍然未知。利用现有数据发表的科学出版物指出,该病毒的自然来源与中国武汉一个市场的野生动物交易有关。然而,假设SARS-CoV-2的起源与研究有关的理论比比皆是,目前主导着公众对Covid-19大流行起源的讨论。在此,我们试图描述与研究相关的起源情景的多样性,讨论它们的特征和证据基础,并强调一些情景之间的相互不兼容。然后,我们将重点放在SARS-CoV-2的一个特征上,该特征在当今领先的研究相关假设中处于中心地位,即导致刺突糖蛋白中引入多碱基切割位点的插入。我们研究了在研究相关背景下为解释这种插入而提出的各种情景,并展示了SARS-CoV-2在人类中的进化如何提供了证明这种插入自然发生的例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Comptes Rendus Biologies
Comptes Rendus Biologies 生物-生物学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Comptes rendus Biologies publish monthly communications dealing with all biological and medical research fields (biological modelling, development and reproduction biology, cell biology, biochemistry, neurosciences, immunology, pharmacology, ecology, etc.). Articles are preferably written in English. Articles in French with an abstract in English are accepted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信